These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9438746)
1. PAPNET-assisted rescreening of cervical smears: cost and accuracy compared with a 100% manual rescreening strategy. O'Leary TJ; Tellado M; Buckner SB; Ali IS; Stevens A; Ollayos CW JAMA; 1998 Jan; 279(3):235-7. PubMed ID: 9438746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Costs and outcomes of PAPNET secondary screening technology for cervical cytologic evaluation. A community hospital's experience. Brotzman GL; Kretzchmar S; Ferguson D; Gottlieb M; Stowe C Arch Fam Med; 1999; 8(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 9932072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the PAPNET cytologic screening system for quality control of cervical smears. Koss LG; Lin E; Schreiber K; Elgert P; Mango L Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Feb; 101(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 8116579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the PAPNET system in a general pathology service. Farnsworth A; Chambers FM; Goldschmidt CS Med J Aust; 1996 Oct; 165(8):429-31. PubMed ID: 8913244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of PAPNET system for rescreening of negative cervical smears. Ashfaq R; Liang Y; Saboorian MH Diagn Cytopathol; 1995 Jul; 13(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7587873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a comparative review of original and automated rescreen diagnosis of cervicovaginal smears with long term follow-up. Stastny JF; Remmers RE; London WB; Pedigo MA; Cahill LA; Ryan M; Frable WJ Cancer; 1997 Dec; 81(6):348-53. PubMed ID: 9438460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective study of PAPNET: review of 25,656 Pap smears negative on manual screening and rapid rescreening. Halford JA; Wright RG; Ditchmen EJ Cytopathology; 1999 Oct; 10(5):317-23. PubMed ID: 10588350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-assisted rescreening of clinically important false negative cervical smears using the PAPNET Testing System. Rosenthal DL; Acosta D; Peters RK Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 8604564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved quality-control detection of false-negative Pap smears using the Autopap 300 QC system. Marshall CJ; Rowe L; Bentz JS Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Mar; 20(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 10086244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neural-network-assisted analysis and microscopic rescreening in presumed negative cervical cytologic smears. A comparison. Mango LJ; Valente PT Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):227-32. PubMed ID: 9479345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost analysis of PAPNET-assisted vs. conventional Pap smear evaluation in primary screening of cervical smears. Meerding WJ; Doornewaard H; van Ballegooijen M; Bos A; van der Graaf Y; van den Tweel JG; van der Schouw YT; Habbema JD Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 11213501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of a semiautomated Papanicolaou smear screening system: results of a population-based study conducted in Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Sherman ME; Schiffman M; Herrero R; Kelly D; Bratti C; Mango LJ; Alfaro M; Hutchinson ML; Mena F; Hildesheim A; Morales J; Greenberg MD; Balmaceda I; Lorincz AT Cancer; 1998 Oct; 84(5):273-80. PubMed ID: 9801201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. PAPNET analysis of reportedly negative smears preceding the diagnosis of a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or carcinoma. Sherman ME; Mango LJ; Kelly D; Paull G; Ludin V; Copeland C; Solomon D; Schiffman MH Mod Pathol; 1994 Jun; 7(5):578-81. PubMed ID: 7937724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rescreen effect in conventional and PAPNET screening: observed in a study using material enriched with positive smears. van Ballegooijen M; Beck S; Boon ME; Boer R; Habbema JD Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(5):1133-8. PubMed ID: 9755670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The PAPNET system in the rescreening of negative cervical/vaginal smears. A study from the Imola cytology laboratory]. Ghidoni D; Fabbris E; Folicaldi S; Amadori A; Medri M; Bucchi L; Bondi A Pathologica; 1998 Aug; 90(4):357-63. PubMed ID: 9793395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]