112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9438958)
21. Reminiscence and hypermnesia in children's eyewitness memory.
La Rooy D; Pipe ME; Murray JE
J Exp Child Psychol; 2005 Mar; 90(3):235-54. PubMed ID: 15707861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Hypermnesia and total retrieval time.
Mulligan NW
Memory; 2006 May; 14(4):502-18. PubMed ID: 16766451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Perceptual interference at encoding enhances item-specific encoding and disrupts relational encoding: evidence from multiple recall tests.
Mulligan NW
Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):539-46. PubMed ID: 10946537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Lost but not forgotten details: repeated eyewitness recall leads to reminiscence but not hypermnesia.
Turtle JW; Yuille JC
J Appl Psychol; 1994 Apr; 79(2):260-71. PubMed ID: 8206816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of item-specific and relational information on hypermnesic recall.
Klein SB; Loftus J; Kihlstrom JF; Aseron R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Nov; 15(6):1192-7. PubMed ID: 2530312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Consciousness affects hypermnesia: the alternative retrieval pathway hypothesis and retrieval intention].
Hayashi M; Fujioka S; Honda M
Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2008 Oct; 79(4):317-24. PubMed ID: 19069113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Classification accuracy across multiple tests following item method directed forgetting.
Goernert PN; Widner RL; Otani H
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Sep; 60(9):1178-86. PubMed ID: 17676551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Source-monitoring accuracy across repeated tests following directed forgetting.
Goernert PN
Br J Psychol; 2005 May; 96(Pt 2):231-47. PubMed ID: 15969833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Intentional and incidental encoding of item and associative information in the directed forgetting procedure.
Hockley WE; Ahmad FN; Nicholson R
Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):220-8. PubMed ID: 26407851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Recall and recognition hypermnesia for Socratic stimuli.
Kazén M; Solís-Macías VM
Memory; 2016; 24(1):128-45. PubMed ID: 25523628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Hypnotic hypermnesia: the empty set of hypermnesia.
Erdelyi MH
Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1994 Oct; 42(4):379-90. PubMed ID: 7960293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Hypermnesia for high-imagery words: the effects of interpolated tasks.
Shaw GA; Bekerian DA
Mem Cognit; 1991 Jan; 19(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 2017034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reminiscence and item recovery in free recall.
Madigan S
Mem Cognit; 1976 May; 4(3):233-6. PubMed ID: 21287027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Role of Medial Temporal Lobe Regions in Incidental and Intentional Retrieval of Item and Relational Information in Aging.
Wang WC; Giovanello KS
Hippocampus; 2016 Jun; 26(6):693-9. PubMed ID: 26928884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Using cumulative-recall curves to assess the extent of relational and item-specific processing.
Burns DJ; Hebert T
Memory; 2005 Feb; 13(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 15847230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Why consumers misattribute sponsorships to non-sponsor brands: Differential roles of item and relational communications.
Weeks CS; Humphreys MS; Cornwell TB
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Jun; 24(2):125-144. PubMed ID: 29389163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluating hypnotic memory enhancement (hypermnesia and reminiscence) using multitrial forced recall.
Dinges DF; Whitehouse WG; Orne EC; Powell JW; Orne MT; Erdelyi MH
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Sep; 18(5):1139-47. PubMed ID: 1402714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Win some, lose some: hypermnesia for actions reflects increased item-specific processing.
Olofsson U
Mem Cognit; 1997 Nov; 25(6):797-800. PubMed ID: 9421565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Degree of learning, interpolated tests, and rate of forgetting.
Rose RJ
Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):621-32. PubMed ID: 1435265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Unannounced memory tests are not necessarily unexpected by participants: test expectation and its consequences in the repeated test paradigm.
Oeberst A; Lindner I
Cogn Process; 2015 Aug; 16(3):269-78. PubMed ID: 26085107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
