These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9438964)

  • 21. Failure to find evidence of stimulus generalization within pictorial categories in pigeons.
    Sutton JE; Roberts WA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Nov; 78(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 12507007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Testing conditions for viewpoint invariance in object recognition.
    Hayward WG; Tarr MJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Oct; 23(5):1511-21. PubMed ID: 9411023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Amodal completion of moving objects by pigeons.
    Nagasaka Y; Wasserman EA
    Perception; 2008; 37(4):557-70. PubMed ID: 18546663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Discrimination of holograms and real objects by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens).
    Stephan C; Steurer MM; Aust U
    J Comp Psychol; 2014 Aug; 128(3):261-75. PubMed ID: 25133466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Object discrimination by pigeons: effects of object color and shape.
    Lazareva OF; Vecera SP; Levin J; Wasserman EA
    Behav Processes; 2005 Apr; 69(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 15795067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Elemental versus configural perception in a people-present/people-absent discrimination task by pigeons.
    Aust U; Huber L
    Learn Behav; 2003 Aug; 31(3):213-24. PubMed ID: 14577546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of identical context on visual pattern recognition by pigeons.
    Donis FJ; Chase S; Heinemann EG
    Learn Behav; 2005 Feb; 33(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 15971496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Representational insight in pigeons: comparing subjects with and without real-life experience.
    Aust U; Huber L
    Anim Cogn; 2010 Mar; 13(2):207-18. PubMed ID: 19593601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dynamically occluded action recognition by pigeons.
    Gray SL; Qadri MAJ; Cook RG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Oct; 85(7):2515-2530. PubMed ID: 36918511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Peck tracking: a method for localizing critical features within complex pictures for pigeons.
    Dittrich L; Rose J; Buschmann JU; Bourdonnais M; Güntürkün O
    Anim Cogn; 2010 Jan; 13(1):133-43. PubMed ID: 19557444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Recognizing rotated views of objects: interpolation versus generalization by humans and pigeons.
    Spetch ML; Friedman A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):135-40. PubMed ID: 12747500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A new learning paradigm elicits fast visual discrimination in pigeons.
    Huber L; Apfalter W; Steurer M; Prossinger H
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Apr; 31(2):237-46. PubMed ID: 15839779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The pigeon's discrimination of visual entropy: a logarithmic function.
    Young ME; Wasserman EA
    Anim Learn Behav; 2002 Nov; 30(4):306-14. PubMed ID: 12593323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dynamic object recognition in pigeons and humans.
    Spetch ML; Friedman A; Vuong QC
    Learn Behav; 2006 Aug; 34(3):215-28. PubMed ID: 17089589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The role of video coherence on object-based motion discriminations by pigeons.
    Cook RG; Roberts S
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Jul; 33(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 17620027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pigeons and humans are more sensitive to nonaccidental than to metric changes in visual objects.
    Lazareva OF; Wasserman EA; Biederman I
    Behav Processes; 2008 Feb; 77(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 18248918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pigeons can discriminate "good" and "bad" paintings by children.
    Watanabe S
    Anim Cogn; 2010 Jan; 13(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 19533184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. From geons to structure. A note on object representation.
    Leeuwenberg E; Van der Helm P; Van Lier R
    Perception; 1994; 23(5):505-15. PubMed ID: 7800466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Pigeons see correspondence between objects and their pictures.
    Spetch ML; Friedman A
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Nov; 17(11):966-72. PubMed ID: 17176429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. "Supernormality" in a learning situation.
    Hogan JA; Kruijt JP; Frijlink JH
    Z Tierpsychol; 1975 Sep; 38(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 1189653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.