These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9439872)

  • 1. Of apples and oranges, file drawers and garbage: why validity issues in meta-analysis will not go away.
    Sharpe D
    Clin Psychol Rev; 1997 Dec; 17(8):881-901. PubMed ID: 9439872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [What meta-analyses teach us: pros and cons].
    Biondi-Zoccai G; D'Ascenzo F; Frati G; Abbate A
    G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2015 Sep; 16(9):469-74. PubMed ID: 26418385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the statistical conclusion validity of weighted mean results in meta-analysis by analysing funnel graph diagrams.
    Elvik R
    Accid Anal Prev; 1998 Mar; 30(2):255-66. PubMed ID: 9450129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence-based clinical practice: Overview of threats to the validity of evidence and how to minimise them.
    Garattini S; Jakobsen JC; Wetterslev J; Bertelé V; Banzi R; Rath A; Neugebauer EA; Laville M; Masson Y; Hivert V; Eikermann M; Aydin B; Ngwabyt S; Martinho C; Gerardi C; Szmigielski CA; Demotes-Mainard J; Gluud C
    Eur J Intern Med; 2016 Jul; 32():13-21. PubMed ID: 27160381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. More than the sum of its parts: meta-analysis and its potential to discover sources of heterogeneity in psychosomatic medicine.
    Tak LM; Meijer A; Manoharan A; de Jonge P; Rosmalen JG
    Psychosom Med; 2010 Apr; 72(3):253-65. PubMed ID: 20395625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A consumer's guide to meta-analysis.
    LaValley M
    Arthritis Care Res; 1997 Jun; 10(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 9335633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analysis of quasi-experimental research: are systematic narrative reviews indicated?
    Colliver JA; Kucera K; Verhulst SJ
    Med Educ; 2008 Sep; 42(9):858-65. PubMed ID: 18715482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcome selection bias in meta-analysis.
    Williamson PR; Gamble C; Altman DG; Hutton JL
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2005 Oct; 14(5):515-24. PubMed ID: 16248351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An illustrated guide to the methods of meta-analysis.
    Sutton AJ; Abrams KR; Jones DR
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2001 May; 7(2):135-48. PubMed ID: 11489039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Publication bias in psychological science: prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses.
    Ferguson CJ; Brannick MT
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 21787082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical methods for dealing with publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Jin ZC; Zhou XH; He J
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(2):343-60. PubMed ID: 25363575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the quality of published genetic association studies in meta-analyses: the quality of genetic studies (Q-Genie) tool.
    Sohani ZN; Meyre D; de Souza RJ; Joseph PG; Gandhi M; Dennis BB; Norman G; Anand SS
    BMC Genet; 2015 May; 16():50. PubMed ID: 25975208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The prevalence and effect of publication bias in orthopaedic meta-analyses.
    Vavken P; Dorotka R
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 21360256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Publication bias in obesity treatment trials?
    Allison DB; Faith MS; Gorman BS
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1996 Oct; 20(10):931-7. PubMed ID: 8910098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Publication bias in psychological science: comment on Ferguson and Brannick (2012).
    Rothstein HR; Bushman BJ
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 22369520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature.
    Sterne JA; Gavaghan D; Egger M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 Nov; 53(11):1119-29. PubMed ID: 11106885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modelling publication bias in meta-analysis: a review.
    Sutton AJ; Song F; Gilbody SM; Abrams KR
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2000 Oct; 9(5):421-45. PubMed ID: 11191259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strategies to improve the credibility of meta-analyses in spine surgery: a systematic survey.
    Evaniew N; van der Watt L; Bhandari M; Ghert M; Aleem I; Drew B; Guyatt G
    Spine J; 2015 Sep; 15(9):2066-76. PubMed ID: 26002725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Issues in comparisons between meta-analyses and large trials.
    Ioannidis JP; Cappelleri JC; Lau J
    JAMA; 1998 Apr; 279(14):1089-93. PubMed ID: 9546568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.