These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9440332)

  • 1. Ear canal reflectance in the presence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. I. Limit-cycle oscillator model.
    Tubis A; Talmadge CL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jan; 103(1):454-61. PubMed ID: 9440332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Energy reflectance in the ear canal can exceed unity near spontaneous otoacoustic emission frequencies.
    Burns EM; Keefe DH; Ling R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jan; 103(1):462-74. PubMed ID: 9440333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions measured using an open ear-canal recording technique.
    Boul A; Lineton B
    Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 269(1-2):112-21. PubMed ID: 20600736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of static ear canal pressure on human spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: spectral width as a measure of the intra-cochlear oscillation amplitude.
    van Dijk P; Maat B; de Kleine E
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2011 Feb; 12(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 21061039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relaxation dynamics of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions perturbed by external tones. II. Suppression of interacting emissions.
    Murphy WJ; Tubis A; Talmadge CL; Long GR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jun; 97(6):3711-20. PubMed ID: 7790650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammalian spontaneous otoacoustic emissions are amplitude-stabilized cochlear standing waves.
    Shera CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):244-62. PubMed ID: 12880039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual consequences of the interactions between spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and external tones. I. Monaural diplacusis and aftertones.
    Long G
    Hear Res; 1998 May; 119(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 9641318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correlated amplitude fluctuations of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    van Dijk P; Wit HP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jul; 104(1):336-43. PubMed ID: 9670526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions created through the interaction of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and externally generated tones.
    Norrix LW; Glattke TJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Aug; 100(2 Pt 1):945-55. PubMed ID: 8759948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Results of a study of the presence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the newborn].
    Sequi Canet JM; Mir Plana B; Paredes Cencillo C; Brines Solanes J; Marco Algarra J
    An Esp Pediatr; 1992 Aug; 37(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 1416536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: measurement and data.
    Penner MJ; Glotzbach L; Huang T
    Hear Res; 1993 Aug; 68(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 8407608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Heart beat modulation of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in guinea pig.
    Ren T; Zhang M; Nuttall AL; Miller JM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1995 Nov; 115(6):725-31. PubMed ID: 8749191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does static ear canal pressure influence pure tone pitch perception?
    Rowan D; Kapadia S; Lutman ME
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 Apr; 124(3):286-9. PubMed ID: 15141757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of low-frequency biasing on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: amplitude modulation.
    Bian L; Watts KL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):887-98. PubMed ID: 18247892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spectral shapes of forward and reverse transfer functions between ear canal and cochlea estimated using DPOAE input/output functions.
    Keefe DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):249-60. PubMed ID: 11831799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the relation between hearing sensitivity and otoacoustic emissions.
    McFadden D; Mishra R
    Hear Res; 1993 Dec; 71(1-2):208-13. PubMed ID: 8113138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequency Shifts in a Local Oscillator Model for the Generation of Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions by the Lizard Ear.
    Wit HP; Bell A
    Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(3):183-193. PubMed ID: 36626887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual correlates of neural plasticity related to spontaneous otoacoustic emissions?
    Norena A; Micheyl C; Durrant J; Chéry-Croze S; Collet L
    Hear Res; 2002 Sep; 171(1-2):66-71. PubMed ID: 12204350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency selectivity of the human cochlea: Suppression tuning of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    Manley GA; van Dijk P
    Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():53-62. PubMed ID: 27139323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of low-frequency biasing on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: frequency modulation.
    Bian L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3009-21. PubMed ID: 19045788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.