BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9440343)

  • 1. Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people.
    Peters RW; Moore BC; Baer T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jan; 103(1):577-87. PubMed ID: 9440343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Benefits of linear amplification and multichannel compression for speech comprehension in backgrounds with spectral and temporal dips.
    Moore BC; Peters RW; Stone MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jan; 105(1):400-11. PubMed ID: 9921666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
    Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech-in-noise perception in high-functioning individuals with autism or Asperger's syndrome.
    Alcántara JI; Weisblatt EJ; Moore BC; Bolton PF
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2004 Sep; 45(6):1107-14. PubMed ID: 15257667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relationship between the intelligibility of time-compressed speech and speech in noise in young and elderly listeners.
    Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):401-8. PubMed ID: 11831813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of Hearing Loss and Fast-Acting Compression on Amplitude Modulation Perception and Speech Intelligibility.
    Wiinberg A; Jepsen ML; Epp B; Dau T
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 29668566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of age and cochlear hearing loss on temporal fine structure sensitivity, frequency selectivity, and speech reception in noise.
    Hopkins K; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):334-49. PubMed ID: 21786903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of fast-acting high-frequency compression on the intelligibility of speech in steady and fluctuating background sounds.
    Stone MA; Moore BC; Wojtczak M; Gudgin E
    Br J Audiol; 1997 Aug; 31(4):257-73. PubMed ID: 9307821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of intensity perturbations on speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    van Schijndel NH; Houtgast T; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2202-10. PubMed ID: 11386571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the NAL(R) and Cambridge formulae for the fitting of linear hearing aids.
    Peters RW; Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Feb; 34(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 10759075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simulation of the effects of loudness recruitment and threshold elevation on the intelligibility of speech in quiet and in a background of speech.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Oct; 94(4):2050-62. PubMed ID: 8227747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sentence intelligibility in noise for listeners with normal hearing and hearing impairment: influence of measurement procedure and masking parameters.
    Wagener KC; Brand T
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Mar; 44(3):144-56. PubMed ID: 15916115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing.
    Koelewijn T; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech recognition in normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss as a function of the number of spectral channels.
    Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Nov; 120(5 Pt 1):2908-25. PubMed ID: 17139748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times.
    Baer T; Moore BC; Gatehouse S
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):49-72. PubMed ID: 8263829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychoacoustic abilities of subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing impairments and their relationship to the ability to understand speech.
    Glasberg BR; Moore BC
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1989; 32():1-25. PubMed ID: 2711118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of the intelligibility for speech in real-life background noises for subjects with normal hearing.
    Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 18490862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing.
    Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1725-36. PubMed ID: 2262629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling speech intelligibility in quiet and noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Rhebergen KS; Lyzenga J; Dreschler WA; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1570-83. PubMed ID: 20329857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory and nonauditory factors affecting speech reception in noise by older listeners.
    George EL; Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Goverts ST; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Apr; 121(4):2362-75. PubMed ID: 17471748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.