These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9440402)

  • 1. Response rate to mailed epidemiologic questionnaires: a population-based randomized trial of variations in design and mailing routines.
    Eaker S; Bergström R; Bergström A; Adami HO; Nyren O
    Am J Epidemiol; 1998 Jan; 147(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 9440402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized trial of mailed questionnaires versus telephone interviews: response patterns in a survey.
    Feveile H; Olsen O; Hogh A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Jun; 7():27. PubMed ID: 17592653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recruiting survey respondents to mailed surveys: controlled trials of incentives and prompts.
    Spry VM; Hovell MF; Sallis JG; Hofsteter CR; Elder JP; Molgaard CA
    Am J Epidemiol; 1989 Jul; 130(1):166-72. PubMed ID: 2741903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomised controlled comparison of the Health Survey Short Form (SF-12) and the Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS) in telephone interviews versus self-administered questionnaires. Are the results equivalent?
    Lungenhausen M; Lange S; Maier C; Schaub C; Trampisch HJ; Endres HG
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Nov; 7():50. PubMed ID: 18034900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of the method of administration, mail or telephone, on the validity and reliability of a respiratory health questionnaire. The Spanish Centers of the European Asthma Study.
    Galobardes B; Sunyer J; Antó JM; Castellsagué J; Soriano JB; Tobias A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1998 Oct; 51(10):875-81. PubMed ID: 9762881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparability of skin screening histories obtained by telephone interviews and mailed questionnaires: a randomized crossover study.
    Aitken JF; Youl PH; Janda M; Elwood M; Ring IT; Lowe JB
    Am J Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 160(6):598-604. PubMed ID: 15353421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Including the questionnaire with an invitation letter did not improve a telephone survey's response rate.
    Byrne CM; Harrison JD; Young JM; Selby WS; Solomon MJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 60(12):1312-4. PubMed ID: 17998087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Controlled trial of the effect of length, incentives, and follow-up techniques on response to a mailed questionnaire.
    Hoffman SC; Burke AE; Helzlsouer KJ; Comstock GW
    Am J Epidemiol; 1998 Nov; 148(10):1007-11. PubMed ID: 9829873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Questionnaire Breakoff and Item Nonresponse in Web-Based Questionnaires: Multilevel Analysis of Person-Level and Item Design Factors in a Birth Cohort.
    Blumenberg C; Zugna D; Popovic M; Pizzi C; Barros AJD; Richiardi L
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Dec; 20(12):e11046. PubMed ID: 30530454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length and reminder on participation rate: a quasi-randomised controlled trial.
    Koitsalu M; Eklund M; Adolfsson J; Grönberg H; Brandberg Y
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jan; 18(1):3. PubMed ID: 29304734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short postal questionnaire and selective clinical examination combined with repeat mailing and telephone reminders as a method of follow-up in hernia surgery.
    López-Cano M; Vilallonga R; Sánchez JL; Hermosilla E; Armengol M
    Hernia; 2007 Oct; 11(5):397-402. PubMed ID: 17520168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using publicly available directories to trace survey nonresponders and calculate adjusted response rates.
    Harvey BJ; Wilkins AL; Hawker GA; Badley EM; Coyte PC; Glazier RH; Williams JI; Wright JG
    Am J Epidemiol; 2003 Nov; 158(10):1007-11. PubMed ID: 14607809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires.
    Edwards P; Roberts I; Clarke M; DiGuiseppi C; Pratap S; Wentz R; Kwan I; Cooper R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Apr; (2):MR000008. PubMed ID: 17443629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Increasing response to mailed questionnaires by including a pencil/pen.
    White E; Carney PA; Kolar AS
    Am J Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 162(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 15972931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the Effects of Participant Preference and Demographics in the Usage of Web-based Survey Questionnaires by Women Attending Screening Mammography in British Columbia.
    Mlikotic R; Parker B; Rajapakshe R
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Mar; 18(3):e70. PubMed ID: 27005707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Baseline recruitment and analyses of nonresponse of the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study: identifiability of phone numbers as the major determinant of response.
    Stang A; Moebus S; Dragano N; Beck EM; Möhlenkamp S; Schmermund A; Siegrist J; Erbel R; Jöckel KH;
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2005; 20(6):489-96. PubMed ID: 16121757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shortening a survey and using alternative forms of prenotification: impact on response rate and quality.
    Beebe TJ; Rey E; Ziegenfuss JY; Jenkins S; Lackore K; Talley NJ; Locke RG
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jun; 10():50. PubMed ID: 20529365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incentives increased return rates but did not influence partial nonresponse or treatment outcome in a randomized trial.
    Dirmaier J; Harfst T; Koch U; Schulz H
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 60(12):1263-70. PubMed ID: 17998081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maximising response to postal questionnaires--a systematic review of randomised trials in health research.
    Nakash RA; Hutton JL; Jørstad-Stein EC; Gates S; Lamb SE
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Feb; 6():5. PubMed ID: 16504090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prenotification had no additional effect on the response rate and survey quality: a randomized trial.
    Xie Y; Ho SC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 66(12):1422-6. PubMed ID: 23742789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.