145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9440892)
1. [MR myelography in spinal canal stenosis].
Freund M; Hutzelmann A; Steffens JC; Buhl R; Heller M
Rofo; 1997 Nov; 167(5):474-8. PubMed ID: 9440892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [3D-MR myelography in diagnosis of lumbar spinal nerve root compression syndromes. Comparative study with conventional myelography].
Eberhardt KE; Hollenbach HP; Huk WJ
Aktuelle Radiol; 1994 Nov; 4(6):313-7. PubMed ID: 7819293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement of spinal root angle at spinal canal and foraminal levels in cases of facet arthropathy: T2-weighted turbo spin echo magnetic resonance myelography with SPACE technique.
Bulut SSD; Nurili F; Aras O; Bukte Y; Naderi S
Acta Radiol; 2020 Jun; 61(6):821-829. PubMed ID: 31653187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved magnetic resonance myelography of the lumbar spine using image fusion and volumetry.
Eberhardt K; Ganslandt O; Stadlbauer A
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):220-6. PubMed ID: 24328762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The role of three dimensional MR myelography in lumbar discogenic disease].
Erdem LO; Erdem CZ; Gündoğdu S; Cağavi F; Kalayci M; Açikgöz B
Tani Girisim Radyol; 2004 Sep; 10(3):189-95. PubMed ID: 15470619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional MR myelography of the lumbar spine: comparative case study to X-ray myelography.
Eberhardt KE; Hollenbach HP; Tomandl B; Huk WJ
Eur Radiol; 1997; 7(5):737-42. PubMed ID: 9166575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The value of dynamic radiographic myelography in addition to magnetic resonance imaging in detection lumbar spinal canal stenosis: A prospective study.
Merkle M; Maier G; Danz S; Kaminsky J; Tatagiba MS; Hebela NM; Roser F
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2016 Apr; 143():4-8. PubMed ID: 26874937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Myelography using flat panel volumetric computed tomography: a comparative study in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Engelhorn T; Rennert J; Richter G; Struffert T; Ganslandt O; Doerfler A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(18):E523-7. PubMed ID: 17700433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can recumbent magnetic resonance imaging replace myelography or computed tomography myelography for detecting lumbar spinal stenosis?
Sasaki K; Hasegawa K; Shimoda H; Keiji I; Homma T
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2013 Jul; 23 Suppl 1():S77-83. PubMed ID: 23542928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lumbar herniated disk disease and canal stenosis: prospective evaluation by surface coil MR, CT, and myelography.
Modic MT; Masaryk T; Boumphrey F; Goormastic M; Bell G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Oct; 147(4):757-65. PubMed ID: 3489378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Improved magnetic resonance myelography using image fusion].
Eberhardt K; Ganslandt O; Stadlbauer A
Rofo; 2013 Apr; 185(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 23348124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR-myelography: a comparison with conventional myelography.
Hergan K; Amann T; Vonbank H; Hefel C
Eur J Radiol; 1996 Feb; 21(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 8777910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance myelography in the presurgical diagnosis of lumbar foraminal stenosis.
Aota Y; Niwa T; Yoshikawa K; Fujiwara A; Asada T; Saito T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(8):896-903. PubMed ID: 17426636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Functional Myelography.
Morgalla M; Frantz S; Dezena RA; Pereira CU; Tatagiba M
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2018 Jul; 79(4):316-322. PubMed ID: 29346832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis in adults: a metaanalysis of the accuracy of CT, MR, and myelography.
Kent DL; Haynor DR; Larson EB; Deyo RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 May; 158(5):1135-44. PubMed ID: 1533084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Value of magnetic resonance myelography in the diagnosis of disc herniation and spinal stenosis.
Pui MH; Husen YA
Australas Radiol; 2000 Aug; 44(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 10974720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the narrow cervical spinal canal: a prospective comparison of MRI, myelography and CT-myelography.
Reul J; Gievers B; Weis J; Thron A
Neuroradiology; 1995 Apr; 37(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 7603592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance myelography (MRM) as a spinal examination technique.
Ramsbacher J; Schilling AM; Wolf KJ; Brock M
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 1997; 139(11):1080-4. PubMed ID: 9442224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3D MRI of the cervical spine: low flip angle FISP vs. Gd-DTPA TurboFLASH in degenerative disk disease.
Ross JS; Ruggieri PM; Glicklich M; Obuchowski N; Dillinger J; Masaryk TJ; Qu Y; Modic MT
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1993; 17(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 8419435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Sonographic determination of spinal canal width. Comparison of computed tomography, myelography and conventional roentgen study of the lumbar spine].
Helzel MV; Betz H; Gladziwa U; Frey M
Radiologe; 1985 Jun; 25(6):277-83. PubMed ID: 3895290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
