These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9440929)

  • 1. Detection of eukaryotic promoters using Markov transition matrices.
    Audic S; Claverie JM
    Comput Chem; 1997; 21(4):223-7. PubMed ID: 9440929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Weight matrix descriptions of four eukaryotic RNA polymerase II promoter elements derived from 502 unrelated promoter sequences.
    Bucher P
    J Mol Biol; 1990 Apr; 212(4):563-78. PubMed ID: 2329577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of eukaryotic promoter sequences reveals a systematically occurring CT-signal.
    Larsen NI; Engelbrecht J; Brunak S
    Nucleic Acids Res; 1995 Apr; 23(7):1223-30. PubMed ID: 7739901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Drosophila TFIID binds to a conserved downstream basal promoter element that is present in many TATA-box-deficient promoters.
    Burke TW; Kadonaga JT
    Genes Dev; 1996 Mar; 10(6):711-24. PubMed ID: 8598298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PromFD 1.0: a computer program that predicts eukaryotic pol II promoters using strings and IMD matrices.
    Chen QK; Hertz GZ; Stormo GD
    Comput Appl Biosci; 1997 Feb; 13(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 9088706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eukaryotic promoter recognition by binding sites for transcription factors.
    Kondrakhin YV; Kel AE; Kolchanov NA; Romashchenko AG; Milanesi L
    Comput Appl Biosci; 1995 Oct; 11(5):477-88. PubMed ID: 8590170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interpolated markov chains for eukaryotic promoter recognition.
    Ohler U; Harbeck S; Niemann H; Nöth E; Reese MG
    Bioinformatics; 1999 May; 15(5):362-9. PubMed ID: 10366656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. RpoD promoters in Campylobacter jejuni exhibit a strong periodic signal instead of a -35 box.
    Petersen L; Larsen TS; Ussery DW; On SL; Krogh A
    J Mol Biol; 2003 Mar; 326(5):1361-72. PubMed ID: 12595250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prevalence of the initiator over the TATA box in human and yeast genes and identification of DNA motifs enriched in human TATA-less core promoters.
    Yang C; Bolotin E; Jiang T; Sladek FM; Martinez E
    Gene; 2007 Mar; 389(1):52-65. PubMed ID: 17123746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visualizing the competitive recognition of TATA-boxes in vertebrate promoters.
    Audic S; Claverie JM
    Trends Genet; 1998 Jan; 14(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 9448460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recognition of prokaryotic and eukaryotic promoters using convolutional deep learning neural networks.
    Umarov RK; Solovyev VV
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171410. PubMed ID: 28158264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling promoter grammars with evolving hidden Markov models.
    Won KJ; Sandelin A; Marstrand TT; Krogh A
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(15):1669-75. PubMed ID: 18535083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Random Screen Using a Novel Reporter Assay System Reveals a Set of Sequences That Are Preferred as the TATA or TATA-Like Elements in the CYC1 Promoter of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Watanabe K; Yabe M; Kasahara K; Kokubo T
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129357. PubMed ID: 26046838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Specific modelling of regulatory units in DNA sequences.
    Frech K; Werner T
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 1997; ():151-62. PubMed ID: 9390288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional binding of the "TATA" box binding component of transcription factor TFIID to the -30 region of TATA-less promoters.
    Wiley SR; Kraus RJ; Mertz JE
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1992 Jul; 89(13):5814-8. PubMed ID: 1321424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficient transcription of an immunoglobulin kappa promoter requires specific sequence elements overlapping with and downstream of the transcriptional start site.
    Pelletier MR; Hatada EN; Scholz G; Scheidereit C
    Nucleic Acids Res; 1997 Oct; 25(20):3995-4003. PubMed ID: 9321649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recognition of eukaryotic promoters using a genetic algorithm based on iterative discriminant analysis.
    Levitsky VG; Katokhin AV
    In Silico Biol; 2003; 3(1-2):81-7. PubMed ID: 12762848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The statistical significance of nucleotide position-weight matrix matches.
    Claverie JM; Audic S
    Comput Appl Biosci; 1996 Oct; 12(5):431-9. PubMed ID: 8996792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Computer analysis and recognition of Drosophila melanogaster gene promoters].
    Levitskiĭ VG; Katokhin AV
    Mol Biol (Mosk); 2001; 35(6):970-8. PubMed ID: 11771144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterization of prokaryotic and eukaryotic promoters using hidden Markov models.
    Pedersen AG; Baldi P; Brunak S; Chauvin Y
    Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol; 1996; 4():182-91. PubMed ID: 8877518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.