124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9442126)
1. Critical evaluation of the specificity of MRI and TVUS for differentiation of malignant from benign adnexal lesions.
Reuter M; Steffens J; Schüppler U; Lüttges J; Muhle C; Brinkmann G; Maschek A; Weisner D; Spielmann R; Heller M
Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 9442126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection and characterization of adnexal masses.
Funt SA; Hann LE
Radiol Clin North Am; 2002 May; 40(3):591-608. PubMed ID: 12117195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of Multiparametric MRI (mMRI) on the Therapeutic Management of Adnexal Masses Detected with Transvaginal Ultrasound (TVUS): An Interdisciplinary Management Approach.
Dirrichs T; Bauerschlag D; Maass N; Kuhl CK; Schrading S
Acad Radiol; 2022 Feb; 29(2):183-197. PubMed ID: 33293256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in patients with adnexal masses.
Sohaib SA; Mills TD; Sahdev A; Webb JA; Vantrappen PO; Jacobs IJ; Reznek RH
Clin Radiol; 2005 Mar; 60(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 15710137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance evaluation of adnexal masses.
Guerra A; Cunha TM; Félix A
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):700-9. PubMed ID: 18568564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adnexal masses: accuracy of characterization with transvaginal US and precontrast and postcontrast MR imaging.
Yamashita Y; Torashima M; Hatanaka Y; Harada M; Higashida Y; Takahashi M; Mizutani H; Tashiro H; Iwamasa J; Miyazaki K
Radiology; 1995 Feb; 194(2):557-65. PubMed ID: 7824738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound improve the diagnostic accuracy for the prediction of adnexal malignancy?
Dai SY; Hata K; Inubashiri E; Kanenishi K; Shiota A; Ohno M; Yamamoto Y; Nishiyama Y; Ohkawa M; Hata T
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2008 Jun; 34(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 18686352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. O-RADS scoring system for adnexal lesions: Diagnostic performance on TVUS performed by an expert sonographer and MRI.
Campos A; Villermain-Lécolier C; Sadowski EA; Bazot M; Touboul C; Razakamanantsoa L; Thomassin-Naggara I
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Dec; 169():111172. PubMed ID: 37976101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis with pathology for indeterminate adnexal masses.
Haggerty AF; Hagemann AR; Chu C; Siegelman ES; Rubin SC
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Sep; 24(7):1215-21. PubMed ID: 25153677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differentiation of Benign from Malignant Adnexal Masses by Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI): Quantitative and Semi-quantitative analysis at 3-Tesla MRI.
Gity M; Parviz S; Saligheh Rad H; Fathi Kazerooni A; Shirali E; Shakiba M; Baikpour M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Apr; 20(4):1073-1079. PubMed ID: 31030476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnosis of deep pelvic masses on a gynaecology service: Trans-vaginal ultrasound-guided needle aspiration of pelvic solid and cystic lesions.
Eitan R; Peled Y; Sabah G; Krissi H; Haroush AB; Meizner I; Danon D; Bardin R; Jakobson-Setton A; Salzer L; Mashiach R
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Apr; 57(2):197-200. PubMed ID: 28251612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Classification of asymptomatic adnexal masses by ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography.
Grab D; Flock F; Stöhr I; Nüssle K; Rieber A; Fenchel S; Brambs HJ; Reske SN; Kreienberg R
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Jun; 77(3):454-9. PubMed ID: 10831359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of adnexal tumors].
Roussel A; Thomassin-Naggara I; Darai E; Marsault C; Bazot M
J Radiol; 2009 May; 90(5 Pt 1):589-96. PubMed ID: 19503047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adnexal masses: transvaginal US and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging assessment of intratumoral structure.
Komatsu T; Konishi I; Mandai M; Togashi K; Kawakami S; Konishi J; Mori T
Radiology; 1996 Jan; 198(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 8539360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differentiation of benign from malignant adnexal masses by functional 3 tesla MRI techniques: diffusion-weighted imaging and time-intensity curves of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Malek M; Pourashraf M; Mousavi AS; Rahmani M; Ahmadinejad N; Alipour A; Hashemi FS; Shakiba M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(8):3407-12. PubMed ID: 25921153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective evaluation of 3T MRI findings for primary adnexal lesions and comparison with the final histological diagnosis.
Zhang H; Zhang GF; He ZY; Li ZY; Zhang GX
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Feb; 289(2):357-64. PubMed ID: 23934242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Complex US adnexal masses during pregnancy: Is pelvic MR imaging accurate for characterization?
Thomassin-Naggara I; Fedida B; Sadowski E; Chevrier MC; Chabbert-Buffet N; Ballester M; Tavolaro S; Darai E
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():200-208. PubMed ID: 28668416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective external validation of IOTA three-step strategy for characterizing and classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of alternative two-step strategy using simple-rules risk.
Hidalgo JJ; Ros F; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana Á; Alcázar JL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):693-700. PubMed ID: 30353585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MRI of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses.
Adusumilli S; Hussain HK; Caoili EM; Weadock WJ; Murray JP; Johnson TD; Chen Q; Desjardins B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Sep; 187(3):732-40. PubMed ID: 16928938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical and ultrasound characteristics of surgically removed adnexal lesions with largest diameter ≤ 2.5 cm: a pictorial essay.
Di Legge A; Pollastri P; Mancari R; Ludovisi M; Mascilini F; Franchi D; Jurkovic D; Coccia ME; Timmerman D; Scambia G; Testa A; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 50(5):648-656. PubMed ID: 28004457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
