286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9442325)
1. Cyclic loading of anchor-based rotator cuff repairs: confirmation of the tension overload phenomenon and comparison of suture anchor fixation with transosseous fixation.
Burkhart SS; Diaz Pagàn JL; Wirth MA; Athanasiou KA
Arthroscopy; 1997 Dec; 13(6):720-4. PubMed ID: 9442325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cyclic loading of transosseous rotator cuff repairs: tension overload as a possible cause of failure.
Burkhart SS; Johnson TC; Wirth MA; Athanasiou KA
Arthroscopy; 1997 Apr; 13(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 9127074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cyclic loading of rotator cuff repairs: A comparison of bioabsorbable tacks with metal suture anchors and transosseous sutures.
Goradia VK; Mullen DJ; Boucher HR; Parks BG; O'Donnell JB
Arthroscopy; 2001 Apr; 17(4):360-4. PubMed ID: 11288006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of BioCorkscrew and Bioknotless RC suture anchor rotator cuff repair fixation: an in vitro biomechanical study.
Ammon JT; Nyland J; Chang HC; Burden R; Caborn DN
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2007 Nov; 15(11):1375-81. PubMed ID: 17437085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pullout strength of suture anchors in comparison with transosseous sutures for rotator cuff repair.
Pietschmann MF; Fröhlich V; Ficklscherer A; Hausdorf J; Utzschneider S; Jansson V; Müller PE
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2008 May; 16(5):504-10. PubMed ID: 18193198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rotator cuff repair with bioabsorbable screws: An in vivo and ex vivo investigation.
Cummins CA; Strickland S; Appleyard RC; Szomor ZL; Marshall J; Murrell GA
Arthroscopy; 2003 Mar; 19(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 12627147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro analysis of rotator cuff repairs: a comparison of arthroscopically inserted tacks or anchors with open transosseous repairs.
Chhabra A; Goradia VK; Francke EI; Baer GS; Monahan T; Kline AJ; Miller MD
Arthroscopy; 2005 Mar; 21(3):323-7. PubMed ID: 15756187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical evaluation of transosseous rotator cuff repair: do anchors really matter?
Salata MJ; Sherman SL; Lin EC; Sershon RA; Gupta A; Shewman E; Wang VM; Cole BJ; Romeo AA; Verma NN
Am J Sports Med; 2013 Feb; 41(2):283-90. PubMed ID: 23239668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of suture anchor versus margin convergence plus suture anchor for rotator cuff repair.
Chen SY; Malcarney HL; Murrell GA
Orthop Surg; 2009 Feb; 1(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 22009773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cyclic loading of rotator cuff reconstructions: single-row repair with modified suture configurations versus double-row repair.
Lorbach O; Bachelier F; Vees J; Kohn D; Pape D
Am J Sports Med; 2008 Aug; 36(8):1504-10. PubMed ID: 18296541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Initial fixation strength of massive rotator cuff tears: in vitro comparison of single-row suture anchor and transosseous tunnel constructs.
Tashjian RZ; Levanthal E; Spenciner DB; Green A; Fleming BC
Arthroscopy; 2007 Jul; 23(7):710-6. PubMed ID: 17637405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Failure analysis of rotator cuff repair: a comparison of three double-row techniques.
Zheng N; Harris HW; Andrews JR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 May; 90(5):1034-42. PubMed ID: 18451396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The optimum tension for bridging sutures in transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair: a cadaveric biomechanical study.
Park JS; McGarry MH; Campbell ST; Seo HJ; Lee YS; Kim SH; Lee TQ; Oh JH
Am J Sports Med; 2015 Sep; 43(9):2118-25. PubMed ID: 26150589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of double-row fixation on initial repair strength in rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study.
Meier SW; Meier JD
Arthroscopy; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1168-73. PubMed ID: 17084292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A biomechanical comparison of tendon-bone interface motion and cyclic loading between single-row, triple-loaded cuff repairs and double-row, suture-tape cuff repairs using biocomposite anchors.
Barber FA; Drew OR
Arthroscopy; 2012 Sep; 28(9):1197-205. PubMed ID: 22592123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical repair of the rotator cuff: a biomechanical evaluation of different tendon grasping and bone suture fixation techniques.
Baleani M; Schrader S; Veronesi CA; Rotini R; Giardino R; Toni A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 Oct; 18(8):721-9. PubMed ID: 12957558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical Comparison of Transosseous Knotless Rotator Cuff Repair Versus Transosseous Equivalent Repair: Half The Anchors With Equivalent Biomechanics?
Tashjian RZ; Hoy RW; Helgerson JR; Guss AD; Henninger HB; Burks RT
Arthroscopy; 2018 Jan; 34(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 29079260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Initial fixation strength of transosseous-equivalent suture bridge rotator cuff repair is comparable with transosseous repair.
Behrens SB; Bruce B; Zonno AJ; Paller D; Green A
Am J Sports Med; 2012 Jan; 40(1):133-40. PubMed ID: 22088578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Suture placement near the musculotendinous junction in the supraspinatus: implications for rotator cuff repair.
Kullar RS; Reagan JM; Kolz CW; Burks RT; Henninger HB
Am J Sports Med; 2015 Jan; 43(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 25342649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tissue fixation security in transosseous rotator cuff repairs: a mechanical comparison of simple versus mattress sutures.
Burkhart SS; Fischer SP; Nottage WM; Esch JC; Barber FA; Doctor D; Ferrier J
Arthroscopy; 1996 Dec; 12(6):704-8. PubMed ID: 9115559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
