BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9442599)

  • 1. Physical performance measures of radiographic imaging systems.
    Workman A; Brettle DS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 May; 26(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 9442599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative assessment of a new dental imaging system.
    Walker A; Horner K; Czajka J; Shearer AC; Wilson NH
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Jun; 64(762):529-36. PubMed ID: 2070184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship between radiation dose reduction and image quality change in photostimulable phosphor luminescence X-ray imaging systems.
    Sakurai T; Kawamata R; Kozai Y; Kaku Y; Nakamura K; Saito M; Wakao H; Kashima I
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 May; 39(4):207-15. PubMed ID: 20395461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Evaluation of the quality of screen-film radiographic systems: physical principles and methods of measurement].
    Borasi G; Berardi P; Ferretti PP; Piccagli V
    Radiol Med; 1990 Sep; 80(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 2236696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of observer performance in determining the position of endodontic files with physical measures in the evaluation of dental X-ray imaging systems.
    Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Abdel-Nabi H; Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jul; 29(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 10918454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Toward consensus on quantitative assessment of medical imaging systems.
    Metz CE; Wagner RF; Doi K; Brown DG; Nishikawa RM; Myers KJ
    Med Phys; 1995 Jul; 22(7):1057-61. PubMed ID: 7565380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Image enhancement using computed radiography.
    Long BW
    Radiol Technol; 1990; 61(4):276-80. PubMed ID: 2326438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A model for image formation and image quality prediction in diagnostic radiology.
    Kandarakis I; Cavouras D; Koutsourakis C; Triantis D; Bakas A; Panayiotakis G; Nomicos C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 43 Pt B():517-21. PubMed ID: 10179719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Absolute measures of image quality for the Sens-A-Ray direct digital intraoral radiography system.
    Welander U; McDavid WD; Mörner AC; Tronje G; Tokuoka O; Fuchihata H; Nelvig P; Dove SB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Sep; 80(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 7489279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Imaging characteristics of new screen/film systems for cephalometric radiography.
    Fatouros PP; Gibbs SJ; Skubic SE; Rao GU
    Angle Orthod; 1984 Jan; 54(1):36-54. PubMed ID: 6584050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Standards for intraoral radiographic imaging.
    Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):257-9. PubMed ID: 10980558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The imaging performance of a storage phosphor system for dental radiography.
    Brettle DS; Workman A; Ellwood RP; Launders JH; Horner K; Davies RM
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Mar; 69(819):256-61. PubMed ID: 8800870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physical evaluation of computed radiography as a mammographic X-ray imaging system.
    Workman A; Cowen AR; Brettle DS
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Oct; 67(802):988-96. PubMed ID: 8000844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The physical aspects of traditional radiology and of computed radiology compared].
    Bacarini L; Giacomich R; Saccavini C
    Radiol Med; 1995 Apr; 89(4):506-19. PubMed ID: 7597234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Presentation and physical evaluation of RadioVisioGraphy.
    Mouyen F; Benz C; Sonnabend E; Lodter JP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Aug; 68(2):238-42. PubMed ID: 2780024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of additive noise on system performance of a digital X-ray imaging system.
    Zhang D; Rong J; Chen WR; Gao F; Xu K; Wu X; Liu H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 54(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 17260857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Optimization of dynamic fuzziness and enhancement of image quality of an URI/230-Amethyst digital image intensifier].
    Blinov AB; Kozlovskiĭ EB; Luzin SI; Plutov IG; Rodin VI
    Med Tekh; 2002; (5):6-8. PubMed ID: 12512273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct digital dental x-ray imaging with visualix/VIXA.
    Molteni R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Aug; 76(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 8361738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance characteristics of a Kodak computed radiography system.
    Bradford CD; Peppler WW; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 1999 Jan; 26(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 9949395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.