196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9442613)
21. Diagnostic accuracy of in vitro panoramic radiographs depending on the exposure.
Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Feb; 36(2):68-74. PubMed ID: 17403882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography.
Molander B; Gröndahl HG; Ekestubbe A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15140820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Adaptation of the Panorex II for use with rare earth screen-film combinations.
Ponce AZ; McDavid WD; Lundeen RC; Morris CR
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jun; 61(6):645-8. PubMed ID: 3459997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography.
Dimakopoulou AD; Tsalafoutas IA; Georgiou EK; Yakoumakis EN
Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):123-9. PubMed ID: 16489193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Threshold perception performance with computed and screen-film radiography: implications for chest radiography.
Dobbins JT; Rice JJ; Beam CA; Ravin CE
Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 1549669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. An evaluation of four rare-earth film-screen combinations.
Nettle JR; Ritchings RT
Br J Radiol; 1980 Oct; 53(634):965-8. PubMed ID: 7426919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparative evaluation of the sensitometric properties of screen-film systems and conventional dental receptors for intraoral radiography.
Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou L
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Dec; 68(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 2594331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Use of blue and green systems of image visualization in roentgenology].
Riuduger IuG
Med Tekh; 2004; (6):40-5. PubMed ID: 15656416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The comparison of subjective image quality in conventional and digital panoramic radiography.
Peker I; Toraman AM; Usalan G; Altunkaynak B
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 19336855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Kodak T-Mat G film in rotational panoramic radiography.
Ponce AZ; McDavid WD; Lundeen RC; Morris CR
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jun; 61(6):649-52. PubMed ID: 3459998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of rare earth filtration on patient exposure, dose reduction, and image quality in oral panoramic radiology.
Tyndall DA; Washburn DB
Health Phys; 1987 Jan; 52(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 3804740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Experimental evaluation of screen-film combinations for intraoral panoramic radiography.
Molander B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1986; 15(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 3470222
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Speeds of film-screen combinations for radiography.
Holloway AF; Cheng CN; Paix D
J Can Assoc Radiol; 1983 Dec; 34(4):331-4. PubMed ID: 6668304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparative study of films and screens for mammography.
Kirkpatrick AE; Law J
Br J Radiol; 1987 Jan; 60(709):73-8. PubMed ID: 3814998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Charge-coupled device panoramic radiography: effect of beam energy on radiation exposure.
Farman TT; Farman AG; Kelly MS; Firriolo FJ; Yancey JM; Stewart AV
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jan; 27(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 9482021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Comparison of film-screen combinations with contrast detail diagram and interactive image analysis. 2: Linear assessment of grey scale ranges with interactive image analysis].
Stamm G; Eichbaum G; Hagemann G
Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Sep; 7(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 9410005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of developer temperature changes on the sensitometric properties of direct exposure and screen-film imaging systems.
Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou LS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1989 Feb; 18(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 2599232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Rare-earth filters in panoramic radiography: a means of reducing patient dose without compromising image quality.
Tyndall DA; Washburn DB
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1986; 15(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 3460901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. A study of the zone of sharpness of three panoramic x-ray machines and the effect of screen speed on the sharpness zone.
Hassen SM; Manson-Hing LR
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Aug; 54(2):242-9. PubMed ID: 6956841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A dual sensitivity screen system for TMJ image enhancement in cephalometric radiography: sensitometric evaluation.
Wakoh M; Farman AG; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K; Scarfe WC; Braun S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Aug; 24(3):191-4. PubMed ID: 8617394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
