These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9442613)

  • 41. New mammography screen/film combinations: imaging characteristics and radiation dose.
    Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Zheutlin J; Gornbein JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Apr; 154(4):713-9. PubMed ID: 2107663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Clinical evaluation of dose reduction on image quality of panoramic radiographs.
    Alkurt MT; Peker I; Usalan G; Altunkaynak B
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Jul; 9(5):34-41. PubMed ID: 18633467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Radiation dose reduction in panoramic radiography. Orthopantomograph Model OP 3 modified for rare earth intensifying screens.
    Forsgren L; Julin P
    Swed Dent J; 1982; 6(6):225-31. PubMed ID: 6963005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A comparison of the imaging characteristics of the new Kodak Hyper Speed G film with the current T-MAT G/RA film and the CR 9000 system.
    Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Verdun FR
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(19):4541-52. PubMed ID: 16177488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Digitisation and display of intra-oral films.
    Attaelmanan A; Borg E; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 10808223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Six screen-film combinations using the Oralix Pan DC.
    Kimura K; Underhill TE; Archila L; Linse JM; Langland OE
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1987 Jun; 29(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 3478427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Modified inverse square sensitometry for the determination of the characteristic curve of radiographic screen/film systems.
    Yoshida A; Hiraki Y; Ohkawa Y; Yamada T; Hashimoto K; Aono K
    Acta Med Okayama; 1986 Feb; 40(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 3962729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The effect of developer age on the detection of approximal caries using three dental films.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van Amerongen JP; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jul; 28(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 10455383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Clinical evaluation of intensifying screens and films for intraoral radiography].
    Okano T; Yoda E
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1983 Mar; 50(1):155. PubMed ID: 6577111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Image contrast in various cassette-screen-film combinations].
    Barth HH; Grasser H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1985 Dec; 40(12):1230-4. PubMed ID: 3869536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Automatic processing: effects of temperature and time changes on the sensitometric properties of light-sensitive films.
    Thunthy KH; Hashimoto K; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Jul; 72(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 1891230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Temporomandibular joint pantomography using charge-coupled device, photostimulable phosphor, and film receptors: a comparison.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):9-13. PubMed ID: 10342155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Image resolution in the midsagittal plane of the Orthopantomograph-10 using Lanex regular and T-Mat G screen-film combination.
    Chen SK; Hollender L
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Oct; 74(4):524-30. PubMed ID: 1408031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Reduction of radiation dosage in mammography by using film intensifying foil systems in Poland].
    Iwaszkiewicz K; Bończyk J
    Pol Tyg Lek; 1991 Apr 22-29; 46(17-18):346-8. PubMed ID: 1669071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of kilovoltage on the relative speed of rare-earth screens.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1986; 15(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 3460902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Objective and subjective assessments of Kodak Ektaspeed plus new dental X-ray film: a comparison with other conventional X-ray films.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 May; 36(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 8689744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Diagnostic quality versus patient exposure with five panoramic screen-film combinations.
    D'Ambrosio JA; Schiff TG; McDavid WD; Langland OE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Apr; 61(4):409-11. PubMed ID: 3458153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A clinical comparison of image quality and patient exposure reduction in panoramic radiography with heavy metal filtration.
    Kapa SF; Tyndall DA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Jun; 67(6):750-9. PubMed ID: 2740096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evaluation of rare earth intensifying screens in cephalometric radiography.
    Stathopoulos V; Poulton DR
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 2180348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of x-radiation doses between conventional and rare earth panoramic radiographic techniques.
    Skoczylas LJ; Preece JW; Langlais RP; McDavid WD; Waggener RG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Dec; 68(6):776-81. PubMed ID: 2594329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.