These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9442822)

  • 1. Comparison of current waveforms for the electrical stimulation of residual low frequency hearing.
    McAnally KI; Brown M; Clark GM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1997 Nov; 117(6):831-5. PubMed ID: 9442822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating mechanical responses to pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea.
    McAnally KI; Brown M; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1997 Apr; 106(1-2):146-53. PubMed ID: 9112114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic and electric forward-masking of the auditory nerve compound action potential: evidence for linearity of electro-mechanical transduction.
    McAnally KI; Brown M; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1997 Apr; 106(1-2):137-45. PubMed ID: 9112113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulation of residual hearing in the cat by pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea.
    McAnally KI; Clark GM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Jul; 114(4):366-72. PubMed ID: 7976307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Suppression of the acoustically evoked auditory-nerve response by electrical stimulation in the cochlea of the guinea pig.
    Stronks HC; Versnel H; Prijs VF; Klis SF
    Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):64-74. PubMed ID: 19840841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cochlear Implant Stimulation of a Hearing Ear Generates Separate Electrophonic and Electroneural Responses.
    Sato M; Baumhoff P; Kral A
    J Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 36(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 26740649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) of the cochlear nerve in response to pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea in the rat: effects of stimulation at high rates.
    Haenggeli A; Zhang JS; Vischer MW; Pelizzone M; Rouiller EM
    Audiology; 1998; 37(6):353-71. PubMed ID: 9888192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.
    Saoji AA; Koka K; Litvak LM; Finley CC
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
    Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status.
    Shepherd RK; Javel E
    Hear Res; 1997 Jun; 108(1-2):112-44. PubMed ID: 9213127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hair cell mediated responses of the auditory nerve to sinusoidal electrical stimulation of the cochlea in the cat.
    McAnally KI; Clark GM; Syka J
    Hear Res; 1993 May; 67(1-2):55-68. PubMed ID: 8340278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of electrical stimulation on the acoustically evoked auditory-nerve response in guinea pigs with a high-frequency hearing loss.
    Stronks HC; Versnel H; Prijs VF; Grolman W; Klis SF
    Hear Res; 2011 Feb; 272(1-2):95-107. PubMed ID: 21044671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fos-like immunoreactivity in the auditory brainstem evoked by bipolar intracochlear electrical stimulation: effects of current level and pulse duration.
    Saito H; Miller JM; Pfingst BE; Altschuler RA
    Neuroscience; 1999; 91(1):139-61. PubMed ID: 10336066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Effect of stimulus waveshape on single fibre response properties.
    Shepherd RK; Javel E
    Hear Res; 1999 Apr; 130(1-2):171-88. PubMed ID: 10320107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation using non charge balanced stimuli.
    Shepherd RK; Matsushima J; Millard RE; Clark GM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1991; 111(5):848-60. PubMed ID: 1759570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A physiological investigation of chronic electrical stimulation with scala tympani electrodes in kittens].
    Ni D
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 1992 Dec; 14(6):402-7. PubMed ID: 1303812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates. II. Comparison of fixed amplitude with amplitude modulated stimuli.
    Tykocinski M; Shepherd RK; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1997 Oct; 112(1-2):147-57. PubMed ID: 9367237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in cats. Physiological and histopathological results.
    Shepherd RK; Clark GM; Black RC
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1983; 399():19-31. PubMed ID: 6316712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Platinum dissolution and tissue response following long-term electrical stimulation at high charge densities.
    Shepherd RK; Carter PM; Dalrymple AN; Enke YL; Wise AK; Nguyen T; Firth J; Thompson A; Fallon JB
    J Neural Eng; 2021 Mar; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 33578409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory response to intracochlear electric stimuli following furosemide treatment.
    Hu N; Abbas PJ; Miller CA; Robinson BK; Nourski KV; Jeng FC; Abkes BA; Nichols JM
    Hear Res; 2003 Nov; 185(1-2):77-89. PubMed ID: 14599695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.