These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9444141)

  • 1. Needle phobia risks foetus.
    Langslow A
    Aust Nurs J; 1997 Dec-1998 Jan; 5(6):34-5. PubMed ID: 9444141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. But she's not an "inanimate container...".
    Mishkin B
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1988; 18(3):40-2. PubMed ID: 3397279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fetal versus maternal rights: who is the patient?
    Goldman EB
    Mich Hosp; 1983 Apr; 19(4):23-5. PubMed ID: 10259175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Legal dimensions of maternal-fetal conflict.
    Nelson LJ
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Dec; 35(4):738-48. PubMed ID: 1451357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maternal versus fetal rights--a clinical dilemma.
    Shriner TL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Apr; 53(4):518-9. PubMed ID: 440658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Court-ordered cesarean sections receive judicial defeat.
    Curran WJ
    N Engl J Med; 1990 Aug; 323(7):489-92. PubMed ID: 2082954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Compulsory Caesarean sections: an English perspective.
    Francis R
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1998; 14(2):365-89. PubMed ID: 9693485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enforced caesarean section: a US appeal.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1990 May; 335(8700):1270. PubMed ID: 1971334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patients' rights vs court orders.
    Murphy EK
    AORN J; 1991 Mar; 53(3):794-5, 798-9. PubMed ID: 2031595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mental incapacity and consent to treatment. Who gives the go-ahead?
    Allison G
    Health Serv J; 1997 May; 107(5554):suppl 11-2. PubMed ID: 10168214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The rights of pregnant patients: Carder case brings bold policy initiatives.
    Thornton TE; Paltrow L
    Healthspan; 1991 May; 8(5):10-6. PubMed ID: 10111987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient-choice vaginal delivery?
    Leeman LM; Plante LA
    Ann Fam Med; 2006; 4(3):265-8. PubMed ID: 16735530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The delivery dilemma: a question of competency.
    Cushing M
    Am J Nurs; 1993 Apr; 93(4):20-2. PubMed ID: 8480798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Informed consent to breech birth in New Zealand.
    Powell R; Walker S; Barrett A
    N Z Med J; 2015 Aug; 128(1418):85-92. PubMed ID: 26367363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maternal-fetal conflict: positions and principles.
    Mahowald MB
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Dec; 35(4):729-37. PubMed ID: 1451356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Appeal court rules against compulsory caesarean sections.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 1997 Apr; 314(7086):993. PubMed ID: 9112838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Term breech presentation: an indication for cesarean section].
    Lotgering FK; Senden IP; Steegers EA; Wijman MJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Oct; 145(43):2101-2; author reply 2103-4. PubMed ID: 11715600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Legal aspects of consent 11: compulsory Caesarean sections.
    Dimond B
    Br J Nurs; 2001 Aug 9-Sep 12; 10(15):1002-4. PubMed ID: 11923735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risks of consent.
    Whomes S
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(4):40. PubMed ID: 2211087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Term breech presentation: an indication for cesarean section].
    Roumen FJ; Nijhuis JG
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Aug; 145(32):1533-6. PubMed ID: 11525084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.