These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Compulsory Caesarean sections: an English perspective. Francis R J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1998; 14(2):365-89. PubMed ID: 9693485 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Enforced caesarean section: a US appeal. Brahams D Lancet; 1990 May; 335(8700):1270. PubMed ID: 1971334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Patients' rights vs court orders. Murphy EK AORN J; 1991 Mar; 53(3):794-5, 798-9. PubMed ID: 2031595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Mental incapacity and consent to treatment. Who gives the go-ahead? Allison G Health Serv J; 1997 May; 107(5554):suppl 11-2. PubMed ID: 10168214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The rights of pregnant patients: Carder case brings bold policy initiatives. Thornton TE; Paltrow L Healthspan; 1991 May; 8(5):10-6. PubMed ID: 10111987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient-choice vaginal delivery? Leeman LM; Plante LA Ann Fam Med; 2006; 4(3):265-8. PubMed ID: 16735530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The delivery dilemma: a question of competency. Cushing M Am J Nurs; 1993 Apr; 93(4):20-2. PubMed ID: 8480798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed consent to breech birth in New Zealand. Powell R; Walker S; Barrett A N Z Med J; 2015 Aug; 128(1418):85-92. PubMed ID: 26367363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]