These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9444598)
1. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the effects of an air-abrasive system on dental implants: a comparative in vitro study between machined and plasma-sprayed titanium surfaces. Chairay JP; Boulekbache H; Jean A; Soyer A; Bouchard P J Periodontol; 1997 Dec; 68(12):1215-22. PubMed ID: 9444598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of an air-powder abrasive system on plasma-sprayed titanium implant surfaces: an in vitro evaluation. Parham PL; Cobb CM; French AA; Love JW; Drisko CL; Killoy WJ J Oral Implantol; 1989; 15(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 2640245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SEM evaluation of the in-vitro effects of an air-abrasive system on various implant surfaces. Barnes CM; Fleming LS; Mueninghoff LA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(4):463-9. PubMed ID: 1820316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contaminated implant surfaces: an in vitro comparison of implant surface coating and treatment modalities for decontamination. Dennison DK; Huerzeler MB; Quinones C; Caffesse RG J Periodontol; 1994 Oct; 65(10):942-8. PubMed ID: 7823276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro studies on the effect of cleaning methods on different implant surfaces. Augthun M; Tinschert J; Huber A J Periodontol; 1998 Aug; 69(8):857-64. PubMed ID: 9736367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microvascular changes after placement of titanium implants: scanning electron microscopy observations of machined and titanium plasma-sprayed implants in dogs. Matsuo M; Nakamura T; Kishi Y; Takahashi K J Periodontol; 1999 Nov; 70(11):1330-8. PubMed ID: 10588496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets. Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Histomorphometric analysis of the bone-implant contact obtained with 4 different implant surface treatments placed side by side in the dog mandible. Novaes AB; Souza SL; de Oliveira PT; Souza AM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 12074453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Histologic comparison of a thermal dual-etched implant surface to machined, TPS, and HA surfaces: bone contact in vivo in rabbits. London RM; Roberts FA; Baker DA; Rohrer MD; O'Neal RB Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 12074452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterization of five different implant surfaces and their effect on osseointegration: a study in dogs. Coelho PG; Bonfante EA; Pessoa RS; Marin C; Granato R; Giro G; Witek L; Suzuki M J Periodontol; 2011 May; 82(5):742-50. PubMed ID: 21054223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias. Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants. Orsini G; Assenza B; Scarano A; Piattelli M; Piattelli A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 11151575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bacterial adhesion on smooth and rough titanium surfaces after treatment with different instruments. Duarte PM; Reis AF; de Freitas PM; Ota-Tsuzuki C J Periodontol; 2009 Nov; 80(11):1824-32. PubMed ID: 19905952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic evaluation of interfacial bone healing around 3 different dental implants before and after radiation therapy. Weinlaender M; Beumer J; Kenney EB; Lekovic V; Holmes R; Moy PK; Plenk H Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):212-24. PubMed ID: 16634491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Titanium deposition after peri-implant care with the carbon dioxide laser. Deppe H; Greim H; Brill T; Wagenpfeil S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):707-14. PubMed ID: 12381072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone response to modified titanium surface implants in nonhuman primates (Papio ursinus) and humans: histological evaluation. Mangano C; Perrotti V; Iezzi G; Scarano A; Mangano F; Piattelli A J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 18390239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of bioactive titanium implants following sodium removal treatment. Fawzy AS; Amer MA Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 18585776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]