These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9444808)
21. The response of the dominant firm to competition: the Ocean State case. Goldberg LG; Greenberg W Health Care Manage Rev; 1995; 20(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 7744607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Wis. insurer suing physicians in reversal of typical roles. Burda D Mod Healthc; 1994 Mar; 24(13):33. PubMed ID: 10132355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. States may become battleground in push for collective bargaining. Carroll J Manag Care; 2002 Jun; 11(6):10-2. PubMed ID: 12098869 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Physician negotiations with managed care plans: a primer of antitrust pitfalls. Ronai SE; Hudner HK Conn Med; 1992 Oct; 56(10):571-6. PubMed ID: 1458883 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. In nearly complete legal 180, federal appeals court spares rural Wisc. IDS. Steele CJ Healthc Syst Strategy Rep; 1995 Sep; 12(20):8-10. PubMed ID: 10184451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Antitrust exemption: are health providers crying wolf? Barnett AA J Am Health Policy; 1993; 3(3):38-41. PubMed ID: 10125734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Antitrust in the early 1990's: challenges to new competitive strategies. Sherbrooke AP Ann Health Law; 1992; 1():79-92. PubMed ID: 10141603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Avoid the antitrust trap: providers must study the law before they partner. Litwak P Behav Healthc Tomorrow; 1999 Aug; 8(4):19-23. PubMed ID: 10557691 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Networks can avoid antitrust scrutiny. Waxman JM Provider; 1997 Feb; 23(2):42-5. PubMed ID: 10167120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Court overturns jury's verdict on Blue Cross antitrust violation claim. Kazon PM Bus Health; 1988 Nov; 6(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 10290529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Ball Memorial Hospital: Section 2 Sherman Act analysis in the alternative health care delivery market. Kirsch T Am J Law Med; 1988; 14(2-3):249-79. PubMed ID: 3072878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Antitrust verdict in Marshfield Clinic case still ominous. Lutes ME; Vanderbilt TB Physician Exec; 1995 May; 21(5):25-6. PubMed ID: 10184494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Don't fence us in. The Marshfield Clinic ruling may be bad news for integrated delivery. Barnett AA Hosp Health Netw; 1995 May; 69(9):36-8, 40. PubMed ID: 7728163 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. New sheriff in town. Health insurers take antitrust enforcement matters into own hands with litany of lawsuits. Taylor M Mod Healthc; 2001 Dec; 31(49):26-8. PubMed ID: 11765364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Court decisions give Blues plans one win, one loss in separate antitrust cases. Halper HR; Kazon PM Bus Health; 1987 Mar; 4(5):51-2. PubMed ID: 10280673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Antitrust law applicable to managed care contracting. Weber RD Mich Med; 1995 Apr; 94(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 7791633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. DSSNY, managed care and antitrust laws. A marriage of necessity. Plunkett LR N Y State Dent J; 1996 May; 62(5):8-11. PubMed ID: 8692465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Antitrust, health care quality, and the courts. Hammer PJ; Sage WM Columbia Law Rev; 2002 Apr; 102(3):545-649. PubMed ID: 11985363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Provider boycotts--a review of the Merck-Medco decision. Merck-Medco Managed Care L.L.C. v. Rite Aid Corporation. Becker S Health Care Law Mon; 2000 May; ():10-8. PubMed ID: 14743588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]