110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9445150)
1. Neural network analysis of breast cancer from MRI findings.
Abdolmaleki P; Buadu LD; Murayama S; Murakami J; Hashiguchi N; Yabuuchi H; Masuda K
Radiat Med; 1997; 15(5):283-93. PubMed ID: 9445150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differentiation of common large sellar-suprasellar masses effect of artificial neural network on radiologists' diagnosis performance.
Kitajima M; Hirai T; Katsuragawa S; Okuda T; Fukuoka H; Sasao A; Akter M; Awai K; Nakayama Y; Ikeda R; Yamashita Y; Yano S; Kuratsu J; Doi K
Acad Radiol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):313-20. PubMed ID: 19201360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Malignant-lesion segmentation using 4D co-occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data.
Woods BJ; Clymer BD; Kurc T; Heverhagen JT; Stevens R; Orsdemir A; Bulan O; Knopp MV
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):495-501. PubMed ID: 17279534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advanced integrated technique in breast cancer thermography.
Ng EY; Kee EC
J Med Eng Technol; 2008; 32(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 17852648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neural network approach to the segmentation and classification of dynamic magnetic resonance images of the breast: comparison with empiric and quantitative kinetic parameters.
Szabó BK; Aspelin P; Wiberg MK
Acad Radiol; 2004 Dec; 11(12):1344-54. PubMed ID: 15596372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast MRI lesion classification: improved performance of human readers with a backpropagation neural network computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system.
Meinel LA; Stolpen AH; Berbaum KS; Fajardo LL; Reinhardt JM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jan; 25(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 17154399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Artificial Neural Networks for differential diagnosis of breast lesions in MR-Mammography: a systematic approach addressing the influence of network architecture on diagnostic performance using a large clinical database.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Dietzel A; Zoubi R; Gröschel T; Burmeister HP; Bogdan M; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1508-13. PubMed ID: 21459533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of artificial neural networks for the prediction of lymph node metastases to the ipsilateral axilla - initial experience in 194 patients using magnetic resonance mammography.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Dietzel A; Vag T; Gröschel T; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Acta Radiol; 2010 Oct; 51(8):851-8. PubMed ID: 20707666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features.
Goto M; Ito H; Akazawa K; Kubota T; Kizu O; Yamada K; Nishimura T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jan; 25(1):104-12. PubMed ID: 17152054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Observer study of a prototype clinical decision support system for breast cancer diagnosis using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Boroczky L; Simpson M; Abe H; Drysdale J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Feb; 200(2):277-83. PubMed ID: 23345346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A test of performance of breast MRI interpretation in a multicentre screening study.
Warren R; Hayes C; Pointon L; Hoff R; Gilbert FJ; Padhani AR; Rubin C; Kaplan G; Raza K; Wilkinson L; Hall-Craggs M; Kessar P; Rankin S; Dixon AK; Walsh J; Turnbull L; Britton P; Sinnatamby R; Easton D; Thompson D; Lakhani SR; Leach MO;
Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Sep; 24(7):917-29. PubMed ID: 16916709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of missing data in evaluating artificial neural networks trained on complete data.
Markey MK; Tourassi GD; Margolis M; DeLong DM
Comput Biol Med; 2006 May; 36(5):516-25. PubMed ID: 15893745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast cancer: prediction with artificial neural network based on BI-RADS standardized lexicon.
Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Lo JY; Williford ME; Floyd CE
Radiology; 1995 Sep; 196(3):817-22. PubMed ID: 7644649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multimodality computerized diagnosis of breast lesions using mammography and sonography.
Drukker K; Horsch K; Giger ML
Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):970-9. PubMed ID: 16087091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Discrimination of MR images of breast masses with fractal-interpolation function models.
Penn AI; Bolinger L; Schnall MD; Loew MH
Acad Radiol; 1999 Mar; 6(3):156-63. PubMed ID: 10898034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trained artificial neural network for glaucoma diagnosis using visual field data: a comparison with conventional algorithms.
Bizios D; Heijl A; Bengtsson B
J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 17224745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computerized detection of breast cancer with artificial intelligence and thermograms.
Ng EY; Fok SC; Peh YC; Ng FC; Sim LS
J Med Eng Technol; 2002; 26(4):152-7. PubMed ID: 12396330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An adaptive tissue characterization network for model-free visualization of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance image data.
Twellmann T; Lichte O; Nattkemper TW
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Oct; 24(10):1256-66. PubMed ID: 16229413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Artificial neural network: improving the quality of breast biopsy recommendations.
Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Lo JY; Floyd CE
Radiology; 1996 Jan; 198(1):131-5. PubMed ID: 8539365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
