These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9445855)

  • 61. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. [Effect of stimulus rise time and high-pass masking on early auditory evoked potentials].
    Bunke D; von Specht H; Mühler R; Pethe J; Kevanishvili Z
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Apr; 77(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9592750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Middle Ear Transducer: Long Term Stability of the Latest Generation T2.
    Prenzler NK; Kludt E; Giere T; Salcher R; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():4346325. PubMed ID: 30723738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. [Measurement of electrical evoked middle latency response in cochlear implantation operation].
    Wang B; Cao KL; Wang Y; Lu Y
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 47(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 22805019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant.
    Fraysse B; Macías AR; Sterkers O; Burdo S; Ramsden R; Deguine O; Klenzner T; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Von Wallenberg E; James C
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 16868510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Interaural stimulation timing in single sided deaf cochlear implant users.
    Zirn S; Arndt S; Aschendorff A; Wesarg T
    Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():148-56. PubMed ID: 26302945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. I. Intensity dependence of firing rate and response latency.
    Raggio MW; Schreiner CE
    J Neurophysiol; 1994 Nov; 72(5):2334-59. PubMed ID: 7884463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Assessment of a direct acoustic cochlear stimulator.
    Chatzimichalis M; Sim JH; Huber AM
    Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(5):299-308. PubMed ID: 22739432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Measurement method for the assessment of transmission properties of implantable hearing aids.
    Winter M; Weber BP; Lenarz T
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2002; 47 Suppl 1 Pt 2():726-7. PubMed ID: 12465286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Morphological correlates of hearing loss after cochlear implantation and electro-acoustic stimulation in a hearing-impaired Guinea pig model.
    Reiss LA; Stark G; Nguyen-Huynh AT; Spear KA; Zhang H; Tanaka C; Li H
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():163-74. PubMed ID: 26087114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. A comparative study on speech in noise understanding with a direct acoustic cochlear implant in subjects with severe to profound mixed hearing loss.
    Lenarz T; Verhaert N; Desloovere C; Desmet J; D'hondt C; González JC; Kludt E; Macías AR; Skarżyński H; Van de Heyning P; Vyncke C; Wasowski A
    Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(3):164-74. PubMed ID: 24556905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Research on Auditory Long Latency Response in Normal Hearing Subjects.
    Liu H; Zheng J; Yang XP; Zhu GY
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 32(3):176-179. PubMed ID: 29171734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Are auditory steady-state responses a good tool prior to pediatric cochlear implantation?
    Beck RM; Grasel SS; Ramos HF; Almeida ER; Tsuji RK; Bento RF; Brito Rd
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Aug; 79(8):1257-62. PubMed ID: 26092547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Effects of High Sound Exposure During Air-Conducted Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing in Children and Young Adults.
    Rodriguez AI; Thomas MLA; Fitzpatrick D; Janky KL
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):269-277. PubMed ID: 29466264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Examination of a mechanical amplifier in the incudostapedial joint gap: FEM simulation and physical model.
    Koch M; Eßinger TM; Bornitz M; Zahnert T
    Sensors (Basel); 2014 Aug; 14(8):14356-74. PubMed ID: 25106020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Vibro-EAS: a proposal for electroacoustic stimulation.
    Schraven SP; Mlynski R; Dalhoff E; Wildenstein D; Alkonyi B; Gummer AW; Hagen R
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 25275865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. [A micromanipulator for intraoperative vibratory hearing assessment with an implantable hearing aid transducer].
    Lehner R; Maassen MM; Leysieffer H; Zenner HP
    HNO; 1998 May; 46(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 9647922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Fully implantable hearing aids in patients with congenital auricular atresia.
    Siegert R; Mattheis S; Kasic J
    Laryngoscope; 2007 Feb; 117(2):336-40. PubMed ID: 17277630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. [An experimental study of middle ear implantable hearing device].
    Ni D; Song M; Liang X
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1995 Jun; 75(6):360-2, 384. PubMed ID: 7553150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
    Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.