These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9445977)

  • 1. [Assessing the stability of parameters of equipment for dental radiography].
    Chikirdin EG; Zakharova VI
    Med Tekh; 1997; (5):3-4. PubMed ID: 9445977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Classification and standards criteria for film holders in retro-alveolar radiography].
    Deverin JM
    Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1986; 15(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 3460149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Film factors relevant to color reproduction requirements for use in the dental office.
    Goldenberg AS
    Compendium; 1993 Nov; 14(11):1428, 1430, 1432 passim. PubMed ID: 8620379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maintenance of automatic dental film processors.
    Thunthy KH
    LDA J; 1996; 55(4):12-3. PubMed ID: 9569822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A clinical evaluation of KODAK EKTASPEED dental X-ray film.
    Reynolds RL
    J Okla Dent Assoc; 1982; 73(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 6957555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Clinical value of a new x-ray film for ambulatory dental practice].
    De Michelis B; Borgogna E; Guazzotti L
    Minerva Stomatol; 1982; 31(6):787-91. PubMed ID: 6962343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitometric evaluation of a new E-speed dental radiographic film.
    Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 8593905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Usefulness of a new industrial radiographic paper in dental radiography in place of radiographic film].
    Bernhardt H; Maus G; Schienbein H
    Quintessenz; 1982 Dec; 33(12):2439-44. PubMed ID: 6963449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A survey of all dental x-ray machines in British Columbia using TLD chips 1981-83.
    Morley DR; Greene MW; McConchie JM; Gray AS
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1985 Sep; 51(9):683-7. PubMed ID: 3902173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Automatic development, a guarantee of reliable quality?].
    Jung J; Dabitz S; Hanke R; König J
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1987 Jan; 42(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 3471455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Dental X-ray equipment and new advances in film production].
    Bornvall O; Eckerdal O; Tammisalo EH
    Tandlakartidningen; 1982 Nov; 74(21):1193-5, 1197, 1199. PubMed ID: 6963017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Practical hints to quality dental radiography.
    Winstanley TD
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1994 Sep; 49(9):464-8. PubMed ID: 9508981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of radiographic film barrier envelopes.
    Hubar JS; Oeschger MP; Reiter LT
    Gen Dent; 1994; 42(5):406-8. PubMed ID: 7489870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Certified radiation safety officers program. The Nassau County experience, 1990-1992.
    Goren AD; Sciubba JJ; Moskowitz GW; Lorio PM; Heller MB
    N Y State Dent J; 1993 Nov; 59(9):63-5. PubMed ID: 8247460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictable intra-oral radiographs.
    Whaites EJ; Kidd EA; Dawson E
    Dent Update; 1995; 22(6):230-6. PubMed ID: 8948168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Development of the automatic dental X-ray film processor].
    Bai J; Chen H
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 1999 Jul; 23(4):214-6. PubMed ID: 12583065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraoral x-ray film holders and infection control in U.S. dental schools.
    Jones GA
    J Dent Educ; 1985 Sep; 49(9):656-7. PubMed ID: 3861672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the quality of radiographic processing in general dental practice.
    Thornley PH; Stewardson DA; Rout PG; Burke FJ
    Br Dent J; 2006 May; 200(9):515-9; discussion 503. PubMed ID: 16703095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Reproducibility in bite-wing radiographs. A comparison of Eggen-Bite and Kwik-Bite].
    Møystad A; Larheim TA
    Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid; 1987 Feb; 97(2):41-4. PubMed ID: 3473432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dot on dental duplicating film not reliable to determine left or right.
    Askins H
    J Dent Pract Adm; 1987; 4(4):175-6. PubMed ID: 3483878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.