52 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9445984)
1. [Use of a program package for comparison of radiographic images of tissues during treatment].
Stavitskiĭ RV; Rozhkova NI; Doshanskiĭ VIu; Seriakov VN; Bondar' AN; Lebedenko IM; Burdina II
Med Tekh; 1997; (5):9-11. PubMed ID: 9445984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast image analysis for risk assessment, detection, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer.
Giger ML; Karssemeijer N; Schnabel JA
Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2013; 15():327-57. PubMed ID: 23683087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computers aid diagnosis of breast abnormalities.
Giger ML; Vyborny CJ
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1993 Jun; 15(6):98-102, 113. PubMed ID: 10148792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved determination of breast cancer size in mammography.
Sphiris N; Panayiotakis G; Proimos B; Likaki H; Tzoracoleftherakis E
Technol Health Care; 1996 Aug; 4(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 8885094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer vision and artificial intelligence in mammography.
Vyborny CJ; Giger ML
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):699-708. PubMed ID: 8109525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [A study of image processing condition of mammography using FCR (Fuji Computed Radiography)].
Nakata M
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Apr; 49(4):454-67. PubMed ID: 2798048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-aided methods help cancer diagnoses.
Giger ML; Wolverton DE
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1996 Nov; Suppl Digital X():D17-20. PubMed ID: 10181866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. New, accurate 3-D imaging may prevent breast biopsies.
Telemed Virtual Real; 1998 Mar; 3(3):25-6. PubMed ID: 10183403
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Fractal analysis of a breast carcinoma--presentation of a modern morphometric method].
Sedivy R; Windischberger C
Wien Med Wochenschr; 1998; 148(14):335-7. PubMed ID: 9816645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Morphometry by analysis of microcalcifications and histopathological diagnosis: a new approach to the diagnosis of impalpable lesions of the breast detected by mammography].
Charpin C; Garcia S
Bull Acad Natl Med; 1995 Oct; 179(7):1517-31; discussion 1532-7. PubMed ID: 8556425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a novel method of noise reduction using computer-simulated mammograms.
Tischenko O; Hoeschen C; Dance DR; Hunt RA; Maidment AD; Bakic PR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):81-4. PubMed ID: 15933085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Follow-up of surgical biopsies in microcalcifications of the breast. Comparative analysis of patients submitted to mammography and digitalization of mammographic images].
Rulli A; Cirocchi R; Vento AR; Naninato P; Zanetti A; Carli L
Minerva Chir; 1997; 52(7-8):933-6. PubMed ID: 9411295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The value of mammography in 1203 breast cancers (author's transl)].
Guzzon A; Viganotti G; Bergonzi S; Coopmans de Yoldi G; Nessi R
Radiol Med; 1981 Jun; 67(6):447-51. PubMed ID: 7268104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can computers help radiologists read mammograms?
Vyborny CJ
Radiology; 1994 May; 191(2):315-7. PubMed ID: 8153298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical diagnosis from digital displays: results and conclusions from the St Mary's evaluation project.
Dawood RM; Craig JO; Todd-Pokrapek A; Porter AW; Highman JH; Cunningham DA; Stevens JM; al-Kutoubi A; Crofton ME
Br J Radiol; 1994 Jan; 67(793):1-10. PubMed ID: 8298861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Computer-assisted diagnosis in mammography: the R2 ImageChecker System in detection of spiculated lesions].
Funovics M; Schamp S; Lackner B; Wunderbaldinger P; Lechner G; Wolf G
Wien Med Wochenschr; 1998; 148(14):321-4. PubMed ID: 9816642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions.
Kegelmeyer WP; Pruneda JM; Bourland PD; Hillis A; Riggs MW; Nipper ML
Radiology; 1994 May; 191(2):331-7. PubMed ID: 8153302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting.
Uematsu T; Kasami M
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 18568553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Results of mammography. A study from private practice].
Strasser E
Wien Med Wochenschr; 1971 Apr; 121(15):324-5. PubMed ID: 5555163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimisation of X-ray examinations in Lithuania: start of implementation in mammography.
Adliene D; Adlys G; Cerapaite R; Jonaitiene E; Cibulskaite I
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):399-402. PubMed ID: 15933145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
