156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9446121)
1. [The correct mammographic exam: the usefulness of additional views].
Cilotti A; Bagnolesi P; Moretti M; Marini C; Marinari A; Cambi L; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 1997 Sep; 94(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 9446121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The predictive value of needle localization mammographically assisted biopsy of the breast.
Senofsky GM; Davies RJ; Olson L; Skully P; Olshen R
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1990 Nov; 171(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 2237718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammographic and histologic correlations of microcalcifications.
de Paredes ES; Abbitt PL; Tabbarah S; Bickers MA; Smith DC
Radiographics; 1990 Jul; 10(4):577-89. PubMed ID: 2377764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. US of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications.
Moon WK; Im JG; Koh YH; Noh DY; Park IA
Radiology; 2000 Dec; 217(3):849-54. PubMed ID: 11110953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Nonpalpable lesions of the breast. Diagnostic potentials of the stereotaxic-guided radiogram].
Giuseppetti GM; Baldassarre S; Lucarelli F
Radiol Med; 1995 Dec; 90(6):714-8. PubMed ID: 8685454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Further experience with microfocal spot magnification mammography in the assessment of clustered breast microcalcifications.
Sickles EA
Radiology; 1980 Oct; 137(1 Pt 1):9-14. PubMed ID: 7422866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Detection of microcalcifications in breast specimens by 4-fold DIMA direct magnification radiography compared to 1.5-fold conventional magnification radiography].
Grunert JH; Borchert B; Farber A; Gmelin E
Rofo; 1999 Oct; 171(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 10598166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Atypical hyperplasia of the breast: mammographic appearance and histologic correlation.
Helvie MA; Hessler C; Frank TS; Ikeda DM
Radiology; 1991 Jun; 179(3):759-64. PubMed ID: 2027988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Computer-aided segmentation, form analysis and classification of 2975 breast microcalcifications using 7-fold microfocus magnification mammography].
Grunert JH; Khalifa R; Gmelin E
Rofo; 2004 Dec; 176(12):1759-65. PubMed ID: 15573286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Management of microcalcifications that develop at the lumpectomy site after breast-conserving therapy.
Vora SA; Wazer DE; Homer MJ
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):667-71. PubMed ID: 9169686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Abnormalities of the breast caused by biopsy: spectrum of mammographic findings.
Stigers KB; King JG; Davey DD; Stelling CB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Feb; 156(2):287-91. PubMed ID: 1898800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Additional images and subsequent palpation--indispensable conditions for efficient diagnosis using mammography].
Hüppe JR
Z Lymphol; 1986 Dec; 10(2):63-76. PubMed ID: 3825243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [99mTc-MIBI characterization of breast microcalcifications. Correlations with scintigraphic and histopathologic findings].
Vanoli C; Antronaco R; Giovanella L; Ceriani L; Sessa F; Fugazzola C
Radiol Med; 1999; 98(1-2):19-25. PubMed ID: 10566292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radial scar with microcalcifications: radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Orel SG; Evers K; Yeh IT; Troupin RH
Radiology; 1992 May; 183(2):479-82. PubMed ID: 1561353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of spot compression-magnification and tangential views in mammographic evaluation of palpable breast masses.
Faulk RM; Sickles EA
Radiology; 1992 Oct; 185(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 1523339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Papillary lesions of the breast: diagnostic imaging and contribution of percutaneous needle biopsy with 14G needle].
Bazzocchi M; Berra I; Francescutti GE; Del Frate C; Zuiani C; Puglisi F; Di Loreto C
Radiol Med; 2001 Jun; 101(6):424-31. PubMed ID: 11479438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The significance of mammographic calcifications in early breast cancer detection.
Rosselli Del Turco M; Ciatto S; Bravetti P; Pacini P
Radiol Med; 1986; 72(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 3008222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective comparison of stereotaxic fine-needle aspiration versus stereotaxic core needle biopsy for the diagnosis of mammographic abnormalities.
Symmans WF; Weg N; Gross J; Cangiarella JF; Tata M; Mazzo JA; Waisman J
Cancer; 1999 Mar; 85(5):1119-32. PubMed ID: 10091797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Percutaneous large-core biopsy of papillary breast lesions.
Liberman L; Bracero N; Vuolo MA; Dershaw DD; Morris EA; Abramson AF; Rosen PP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Feb; 172(2):331-7. PubMed ID: 9930777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Local tumor recurrence following breast-conservation therapy: correlation of histopathologic findings with detection method and mammographic findings.
Giess CS; Keating DM; Osborne MP; Rosenblatt R
Radiology; 1999 Sep; 212(3):829-35. PubMed ID: 10478253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
