118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9446505)
1. The focus is now on standards and privacy in electronic patient records.
Levy DA
Ann Intern Med; 1997 Mar; 126(6):I64. PubMed ID: 9446505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Standards for confidentiality, privacy, access, and data security.
Hanken MA
Top Health Inf Manage; 1996 May; 16(4):44-8. PubMed ID: 10157660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dialogue. Privacy protection: paper or computer records? Confidentiality of healthcare records.
Barrows RC; Clayton PD
Behav Healthc Tomorrow; 1996 Feb; 5(1):38, 41, 43-4. PubMed ID: 10158447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Privacy and security for electronic health records.
Sharpe VA
Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(6):49. PubMed ID: 16396204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. How safe are computerized patient records?
Kibbe D; Bard MR
Fam Pract Manag; 1997 May; 4(5):34-6, 41-4, 46 passim. PubMed ID: 10184800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Bound or gagged? Privacy, confidentiality and CPR.
La Puma J
Manag Care; 1996 Sep; 5(9):53-4. PubMed ID: 10162182
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Dialogue: will the increased integration of information systems necessitate lowering standards for patient confidentiality and data privacy? Provider recommendations for safeguarding patient confidentiality.
Webman D
Behav Healthc Tomorrow; 1994; 3(1):32, 37-8. PubMed ID: 10142495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of HIPAA electronic transmissions and health information privacy standards.
Michael P; Pritchett E
J Am Diet Assoc; 2001 May; 101(5):524-8. PubMed ID: 11398779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Health insurance reform: modifications to electronic data transaction standards and code sets. Final rule.
Office of the Secretary, HHS
Fed Regist; 2003 Feb; 68(34):8381-99. PubMed ID: 12596713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Downloading data puts patient privacy at risk.
Brooks S
Contemp Longterm Care; 1996 Jun; 19(6):34. PubMed ID: 10158212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical privacy. New technologies pose a threat.
Roberts SS
Diabetes Forecast; 2002 Dec; 55(12):57-9. PubMed ID: 14870705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Standards for privacy of individually identifiable health information. Final rule.
Office for Civil Rights, HHS
Fed Regist; 2002 Aug; 67(157):53181-273. PubMed ID: 12180470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Information technologies need to protect patient confidentiality.
Pendrak RF; Ericson RP
Healthc Financ Manage; 1998 Oct; 52(10):66-8. PubMed ID: 10187618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. AAMT (American Association for Medical Transcription) speaks out on confidentiality, privacy, and patient care documentation.
J Am Assoc Med Transcr; 1995; 14(4):42, 44-7. PubMed ID: 10143813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preserving the privacy of computerized patient records.
Miller DW
Healthc Inform; 1993 Oct; 10(10):72-4. PubMed ID: 10129483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Privacy protections afforded by computer-based patient record systems.
Amatayakul M
Top Health Inf Manage; 1996 May; 16(4):22-7. PubMed ID: 10157658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient privacy and health information confidentiality.
Sutton JH
Bull Am Coll Surg; 2001 Jul; 86(7):8-12, 51. PubMed ID: 17385260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. AMA, TMA analyzing new privacy rules for medical records.
Williams B
Tenn Med; 2001 Mar; 94(3):80-2. PubMed ID: 11242751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. How secure is the Internet for healthcare applications?
Campbell LA
Radiol Manage; 1996; 18(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 10154332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical records. Enhancing privacy, preserving the common good.
Etzioni A
Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(2):14-23. PubMed ID: 10321335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
