170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9446522)
1. [A foldable cardboard box for drying and storage of by cotton swab collected biological samples].
Hochmeister M; Rudin O; Meier R; Peccioli M; Borer U; Eisenberg A; Nagy R; Dirnhofer R
Arch Kriminol; 1997; 200(3-4):113-20. PubMed ID: 9446522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Double swab technique for collecting touched evidence.
Pang BC; Cheung BK
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2007 Jul; 9(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 17320457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Advantage of ForensiX Swabs in Retrieving and Preserving Biological Fluids.
Mawlood SK; Alrowaithi M; Watson N
J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):686-9. PubMed ID: 25684353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dry cotton or flocked respiratory swabs as a simple collection technique for the molecular detection of respiratory viruses using real-time NASBA.
Moore C; Corden S; Sinha J; Jones R
J Virol Methods; 2008 Nov; 153(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 18761378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Touch DNA collection - Performance of four different swabs.
Comte J; Baechler S; Gervaix J; Lock E; Milon MP; Delémont O; Castella V
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102113. PubMed ID: 31525724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of methods to improve the extraction and recovery of DNA from cotton swabs for forensic analysis.
Adamowicz MS; Stasulli DM; Sobestanovich EM; Bille TW
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e116351. PubMed ID: 25549111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of DNA typing success in compromised blood and touch samples based on sampling swab composition.
Smith C; Cox JO; Rhodes C; Lewis C; Koroma M; Hudson BC; Dawson Cruz T; Seashols-Williams SJ
J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1427-1434. PubMed ID: 33624316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Collection of forensic evidence from pediatric victims of sexual assault.
Girardet R; Bolton K; Lahoti S; Mowbray H; Giardino A; Isaac R; Arnold W; Mead B; Paes N
Pediatrics; 2011 Aug; 128(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 21788219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Buccal DNA collection: comparison of buccal swabs with FTA cards.
Milne E; van Bockxmeer FM; Robertson L; Brisbane JM; Ashton LJ; Scott RJ; Armstrong BK
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Apr; 15(4):816-9. PubMed ID: 16614129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel approach to obtaining reliable PCR results from luminol treated bloodstains.
Della Manna A; Montpetit S
J Forensic Sci; 2000 Jul; 45(4):886-90. PubMed ID: 10914590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of DNA evidence recovered from epithelial cells in penile swabs.
Drobnic K
Croat Med J; 2003 Jun; 44(3):350-4. PubMed ID: 12808732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing a novel room temperature DNA storage medium for forensic biological samples.
Lee SB; Clabaugh KC; Silva B; Odigie KO; Coble MD; Loreille O; Scheible M; Fourney RM; Stevens J; Carmody GR; Parsons TJ; Pozder A; Eisenberg AJ; Budowle B; Ahmad T; Miller RW; Crouse CA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jan; 6(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 21324769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of swabs without transport media for the Gen-Probe Group A Strep Direct Test.
Bourbeau PP; Heiter BJ
J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Jul; 42(7):3207-11. PubMed ID: 15243083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of toluidine blue and destaining reagents used in sexual assault examinations on the ability to obtain DNA profiles from postcoital vaginal swabs.
Hochmeister MN; Whelan M; Borer UV; Gehrig C; Binda S; Berzlanovich A; Rauch E; Dirnhofer R
J Forensic Sci; 1997 Mar; 42(2):316-9. PubMed ID: 9068192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nondestructive Biological Evidence Collection with Alternative Swabs and Adhesive Lifters.
Plaza DT; Mealy JL; Lane JN; Parsons MN; Bathrick AS; Slack DP
J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):485-488. PubMed ID: 27404622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of STR profiles from firearms and fired cartridge cases.
Horsman-Hall KM; Orihuela Y; Karczynski SL; Davis AL; Ban JD; Greenspoon SA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 19647709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Collaborative swab performance comparison and the impact of sampling solution volumes on DNA recovery.
Seiberle I; Währer J; Kron S; Flury K; Girardin M; Schocker A; Schulz I
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102716. PubMed ID: 35512614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Buccal swabs and treated cards: methodological considerations for molecular epidemiologic studies examining pediatric populations.
Beckett SM; Laughton SJ; Pozza LD; McCowage GB; Marshall G; Cohn RJ; Milne E; Ashton LJ
Am J Epidemiol; 2008 May; 167(10):1260-7. PubMed ID: 18326872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visualising latent DNA on swabs.
Kanokwongnuwut P; Kirkbride P; Linacre A
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():115-123. PubMed ID: 30195152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Swabs as DNA collection devices for sampling different biological materials from different substrates.
Verdon TJ; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(4):1080-9. PubMed ID: 24502761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
