190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9446988)
1. Comparative performance of digital and conventional images for detecting proximal surface caries.
White SC; Yoon DC
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jan; 26(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 9446988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition.
Uprichard KK; Potter BJ; Russell CM; Schafer TE; Adair S; Weller RN
Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10730280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative study of high-resolution cone beam computed tomography and charge-coupled device sensors for detecting caries.
Young SM; Lee JT; Hodges RJ; Chang TL; Elashoff DA; White SC
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Oct; 38(7):445-51. PubMed ID: 19767514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital camera resolution and proximal caries detection.
Prapayasatok S; Janhom A; Verochana K; Pramojanee S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 16798921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiographic detection of approximal caries: a comparison of dental films and digital imaging systems.
Syriopoulos K; Sanderink GC; Velders XL; van der Stelt PF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):312-8. PubMed ID: 10980568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of a film-based and a direct digital dental radiographic system using a proximal caries model.
Price C; Ergül N
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jan; 26(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 9446990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of cavitated or non-cavitated approximal enamel caries lesions using CMOS and CCD digital X-ray sensors and conventional D and F-speed films at different exposure conditions.
Bottenberg P; Jacquet W; Stachniss V; Wellnitz J; Schulte AG
Am J Dent; 2011 Apr; 24(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 21698985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of proximal caries in conventional and digital radiographs: an in vitro study.
Rockenbach MI; Veeck EB; da Costa NP
Stomatologija; 2008; 10(4):115-20. PubMed ID: 19223710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries.
Anbiaee N; Mohassel AR; Imanimoghaddam M; Moazzami SM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec; 11(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 21203734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Proximal caries detection: Sirona Sidexis versus Kodak Ektaspeed Plus.
Khan EA; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Caplan D
Gen Dent; 2005; 53(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 15779222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An in-vitro evaluation of Kodak Insight and Ektaspeed Plus film with a CMOS detector for natural proximal caries: ROC analysis.
Nair MK; Nair UP
Caries Res; 2001; 35(5):354-9. PubMed ID: 11641571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vivo study of approximal caries depth on storage phosphor plate images compared with dental x-ray film.
Versteeg KH; Sanderink GC; Velders XL; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):210-3. PubMed ID: 9269024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of spatial resolution and bit depth on detection of small caries lesions with digital receptors.
Wenzel A; Haiter-Neto F; Gotfredsen E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Mar; 103(3):418-22. PubMed ID: 17321456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic accuracy of intraoral film and direct digital images for detection of simulated recurrent decay.
Nair MK; Ludlow JB; May KN; Nair UP; Johnson MP; Close JM
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 11357563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic performance of the visual caries classification system ICDAS II versus radiography and micro-computed tomography for proximal caries detection: an in vitro study.
Mitropoulos P; Rahiotis C; Stamatakis H; Kakaboura A
J Dent; 2010 Nov; 38(11):859-67. PubMed ID: 20654681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
Abreu Júnior M; Tyndall DA; Platin E; Ludlow JB; Phillips C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 10740469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of restorative material and location on the detection of simulated recurrent caries. A comparison of dental film, direct digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography.
Nair MK; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; May K; Ye F
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 9656871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro comparison of conventional film and direct digital imaging in the detection of approximal caries.
Castro VM; Katz JO; Hardman PK; Glaros AG; Spencer P
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Mar; 36(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 17463097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film and the Siemens Sidexis digital imaging system for caries detection using receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Platin E; Nair M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Jan; 85(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 9474625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
