These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9446988)
1. Comparative performance of digital and conventional images for detecting proximal surface caries. White SC; Yoon DC Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jan; 26(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 9446988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition. Uprichard KK; Potter BJ; Russell CM; Schafer TE; Adair S; Weller RN Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10730280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative study of high-resolution cone beam computed tomography and charge-coupled device sensors for detecting caries. Young SM; Lee JT; Hodges RJ; Chang TL; Elashoff DA; White SC Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Oct; 38(7):445-51. PubMed ID: 19767514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital camera resolution and proximal caries detection. Prapayasatok S; Janhom A; Verochana K; Pramojanee S Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 16798921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiographic detection of approximal caries: a comparison of dental films and digital imaging systems. Syriopoulos K; Sanderink GC; Velders XL; van der Stelt PF Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):312-8. PubMed ID: 10980568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of a film-based and a direct digital dental radiographic system using a proximal caries model. Price C; Ergül N Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jan; 26(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 9446990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure. Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of cavitated or non-cavitated approximal enamel caries lesions using CMOS and CCD digital X-ray sensors and conventional D and F-speed films at different exposure conditions. Bottenberg P; Jacquet W; Stachniss V; Wellnitz J; Schulte AG Am J Dent; 2011 Apr; 24(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 21698985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of proximal caries in conventional and digital radiographs: an in vitro study. Rockenbach MI; Veeck EB; da Costa NP Stomatologija; 2008; 10(4):115-20. PubMed ID: 19223710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries. Anbiaee N; Mohassel AR; Imanimoghaddam M; Moazzami SM J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec; 11(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 21203734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Proximal caries detection: Sirona Sidexis versus Kodak Ektaspeed Plus. Khan EA; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Caplan D Gen Dent; 2005; 53(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 15779222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An in-vitro evaluation of Kodak Insight and Ektaspeed Plus film with a CMOS detector for natural proximal caries: ROC analysis. Nair MK; Nair UP Caries Res; 2001; 35(5):354-9. PubMed ID: 11641571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vivo study of approximal caries depth on storage phosphor plate images compared with dental x-ray film. Versteeg KH; Sanderink GC; Velders XL; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):210-3. PubMed ID: 9269024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of spatial resolution and bit depth on detection of small caries lesions with digital receptors. Wenzel A; Haiter-Neto F; Gotfredsen E Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Mar; 103(3):418-22. PubMed ID: 17321456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic accuracy of intraoral film and direct digital images for detection of simulated recurrent decay. Nair MK; Ludlow JB; May KN; Nair UP; Johnson MP; Close JM Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 11357563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic performance of the visual caries classification system ICDAS II versus radiography and micro-computed tomography for proximal caries detection: an in vitro study. Mitropoulos P; Rahiotis C; Stamatakis H; Kakaboura A J Dent; 2010 Nov; 38(11):859-67. PubMed ID: 20654681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT). Abreu Júnior M; Tyndall DA; Platin E; Ludlow JB; Phillips C Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 10740469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of restorative material and location on the detection of simulated recurrent caries. A comparison of dental film, direct digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography. Nair MK; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; May K; Ye F Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 9656871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro comparison of conventional film and direct digital imaging in the detection of approximal caries. Castro VM; Katz JO; Hardman PK; Glaros AG; Spencer P Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Mar; 36(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 17463097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film and the Siemens Sidexis digital imaging system for caries detection using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Platin E; Nair M Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Jan; 85(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 9474625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]