396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9446990)
1. A comparison of a film-based and a direct digital dental radiographic system using a proximal caries model.
Price C; Ergül N
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jan; 26(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 9446990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition.
Uprichard KK; Potter BJ; Russell CM; Schafer TE; Adair S; Weller RN
Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10730280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
Abreu Júnior M; Tyndall DA; Platin E; Ludlow JB; Phillips C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 10740469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film.
Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An in-vitro evaluation of Kodak Insight and Ektaspeed Plus film with a CMOS detector for natural proximal caries: ROC analysis.
Nair MK; Nair UP
Caries Res; 2001; 35(5):354-9. PubMed ID: 11641571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of the automatic exposure compensation on the proximal caries diagnosis.
Yoshiura K; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Goto TK; Chikui T; Kawazu T; Okamura K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 15897283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Proximal caries detection: Sirona Sidexis versus Kodak Ektaspeed Plus.
Khan EA; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Caplan D
Gen Dent; 2005; 53(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 15779222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of RVGui sensor and Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film for proximal caries detection.
Abreu M; Mol A; Ludlow JB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):381-5. PubMed ID: 11250640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro comparison of conventional film and direct digital imaging in the detection of approximal caries.
Castro VM; Katz JO; Hardman PK; Glaros AG; Spencer P
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Mar; 36(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 17463097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems.
Hintze H; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11803388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative performance of digital and conventional images for detecting proximal surface caries.
White SC; Yoon DC
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jan; 26(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 9446988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection.
Alkurt MT; Peker I; Bala O; Altunkaynak B
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film and the Siemens Sidexis digital imaging system for caries detection using receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Platin E; Nair M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Jan; 85(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 9474625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital camera resolution and proximal caries detection.
Prapayasatok S; Janhom A; Verochana K; Pramojanee S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 16798921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of restorative material and location on the detection of simulated recurrent caries. A comparison of dental film, direct digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography.
Nair MK; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; May K; Ye F
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 9656871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of extraoral tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT) for proximal caries detection.
Harase Y; Araki K; Okano T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):791-6. PubMed ID: 16731402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiographic detection of approximal caries: a comparison of dental films and digital imaging systems.
Syriopoulos K; Sanderink GC; Velders XL; van der Stelt PF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):312-8. PubMed ID: 10980568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiographic detection of cavitation in approximal surfaces of primary teeth using a digital storage phosphor system and conventional film, and the relationship between cavitation and radiographic lesion depth: an in vitro study.
Nielsen LL; Hoernoe M; Wenzel A
Int J Paediatr Dent; 1996 Sep; 6(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 9115972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative study of different radiographic methods for detecting occlusal caries lesions.
Tarım Ertas E; Küçükyılmaz E; Ertaş H; Savaş S; Yırcalı Atıcı M
Caries Res; 2014; 48(6):566-74. PubMed ID: 25073755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
