396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9446990)
21. Observer differentiation of proximal enamel mechanical defects versus natural proximal dental caries with computed dental radiography.
Kang BC; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Oct; 82(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 8899789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of direct digital and conventional imaging with Ekta Speed Plus and INSIGHT films for the detection of approximal caries.
de Araujo EA; Castilho JC; Medici Filho E; de Moraes ME
Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 16296430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In vitro comparison of Kodak Ultra-speed, Ektaspeed, and Ektaspeed Plus, and Agfa M2 Comfort dental x-ray films for the detection of caries.
Hintze H; Christoffersen L; Wenzel A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Feb; 81(2):240-4. PubMed ID: 8665322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Diagnostic accuracy of intraoral film and direct digital images for detection of simulated recurrent decay.
Nair MK; Ludlow JB; May KN; Nair UP; Johnson MP; Close JM
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 11357563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessing the accuracy of caries diagnosis via radiograph. Film versus print.
Otis LL; Sherman RG
J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Mar; 136(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 15819345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Film tomography compared with film and digital bitewing radiography for proximal caries detection.
Peker I; Toraman Alkurt M; Altunkaynak B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):495-9. PubMed ID: 18033947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Influence of displayed image size on radiographic detection of approximal caries.
Haak R; Wicht MJ; Nowak G; Hellmich M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 13679355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Extraoral radiographic imaging of primary caries.
Clifton TL; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jul; 27(4):193-8. PubMed ID: 9780894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Extraoral imaging for proximal caries detection: Bitewings vs scanogram.
Khan EA; Tyndall DA; Caplan D
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Dec; 98(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 15583548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of tube potential and image receptor on the detection of natural proximal caries in primary teeth.
Sogur E; Baksı BG; Orhan K; Paksoy SC; Dogan S; Erdal YS; Mert A
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Dec; 15(6):901-7. PubMed ID: 20838834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Optical densities of dental resin composites: a comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film.
Farman TT; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
Gen Dent; 1996; 44(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 9515395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A sensitometric comparison of four dental X-ray films and their diagnostic accuracy.
Svenson B; Welander U; Shi XQ; Stamatakis H; Tronje G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jul; 26(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 9442614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of caries diagnosis in digital images from charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems: an in vitro study.
Wenzel A; Borg E; Hintze H; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):250-4. PubMed ID: 9161170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Performance of film, desktop monitor and laptop displays in caries detection.
Ludlow JB; Abreu M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 10202475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Radiovisiographic diagnosis of dental caries: initial comparison of basic mode videoprints with bitewing radiography.
Russell M; Pitts NB
Caries Res; 1993; 27(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 8448777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Receiver operating characteristics of RadioVisioGraphy.
Dagenais ME; Clark BG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Feb; 79(2):238-45. PubMed ID: 7614189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mechanical defects in dental enamel vs. natural dental caries: observer differentiation using Ektaspeed Plus film.
Kang B-C ; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
Caries Res; 1996; 30(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 8833141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of digital systems and conventional dental film for the detection of approximal enamel caries.
Pontual AA; de Melo DP; de Almeida SM; Bóscolo FN; Haiter Neto F
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Oct; 39(7):431-6. PubMed ID: 20841461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Detection of proximal caries in vitro using standard and task-specific enhanced images from a storage phosphor plate system.
Li G; Sanderink GC; Berkhout WE; Syriopoulos K; van der Stelt PF
Caries Res; 2007; 41(3):231-4. PubMed ID: 17426405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparing the accuracy of panoramic and intraoral radiography in the diagnosis of proximal caries.
Akkaya N; Kansu O; Kansu H; Cagirankaya LB; Arslan U
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 May; 35(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 16618850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
