These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9446990)

  • 41. Performance of a new F-speed film for caries detection.
    Ludlow JB; Abreu M; Mol A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Mar; 30(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 11313732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. In vitro carious lesion detection on D-, E-, and F-speed radiographic films.
    Schulze RK; Nackat D; D'hoedt B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Apr; 97(4):529-34. PubMed ID: 15088040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparative diagnostic performance of TACT slices and its multiple source images: an in vitro study.
    Abreu M; Yi-Ching L; Abreu AL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 15314000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effect of different background lighting conditions on diagnostic performance of digital and film images.
    Cederberg RA; Frederiksen NL; Benson BW; Shulman JD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Sep; 27(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 9879219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparison of sensitometric and diagnostic performance of two films.
    White SC; Yoon DC
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2000 Jun; 21(6):530-2, 534, 536 passim. PubMed ID: 11199671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Interaction between noise and file compression and its effect on the recognition of caries in digital imaging.
    Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10654032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. RVG-S, VIXA, and Ektaspeed film in detection of proximal enamel defects under orthodontic bands.
    Reichl P; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 8678348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Tuned-aperture computed tomography for detection of occlusal caries.
    Shi XQ; Han P; Welander U; Angmar-Månsson B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 11175273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparing the accuracy of Dutch dentists and dental students in the radiographic diagnosis of dentinal caries.
    Mileman PA; van den Hout WB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 11803382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries.
    Anbiaee N; Mohassel AR; Imanimoghaddam M; Moazzami SM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec; 11(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 21203734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Observer differentiation of mechanical defects versus natural dental caries cavitations on monitor-displayed images with imaging plate readout.
    Kang BC; Goldsmith LJ; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Nov; 86(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 9830655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Standards for intraoral radiographic imaging.
    Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):257-9. PubMed ID: 10980558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Detection of proximal caries in conventional and digital radiographs: an in vitro study.
    Rockenbach MI; Veeck EB; da Costa NP
    Stomatologija; 2008; 10(4):115-20. PubMed ID: 19223710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Performance of digital radiography with enhancement filters for the diagnosis of proximal caries.
    Belém MD; Ambrosano GM; Tabchoury CP; Ferreira-Santos RI; Haiter-Neto F
    Braz Oral Res; 2013; 27(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 23739784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The influence of image quality on radiographic diagnosis of approximal caries.
    Svenson B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1991; 74():1-62. PubMed ID: 2035145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Influence of education level and experience on detection of approximal caries in digital dental radiographs. An in vitro study.
    Hellén-Halme K; Petersson GH
    Swed Dent J; 2010; 34(2):63-9. PubMed ID: 20701214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Detection of artificial occlusal caries in a phosphor imaging plate system with two types of LCD monitors versus three different films.
    Ilgüy M; Dinçer S; Ilgüy D; Bayirli G
    J Digit Imaging; 2009 Jun; 22(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 18949518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of noise on the compressibility and diagnostic accuracy for caries detection of digital bitewing radiographs.
    Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC; Geraets WG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 10202472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The efficacy of caries detection using three intraoral films under different processing conditions.
    Ludlow JB; Platin E; Delano EO; Clifton L
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 128(10):1401-8. PubMed ID: 9332141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Diagnostic accuracy of proximal caries by digital radiographs: an in vivo and in vitro comparative study.
    Li G; Qu XM; Chen Y; Zhang J; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Mar; 109(3):463-7. PubMed ID: 20097105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.