These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9446990)

  • 61. Tuned aperture computed tomography and detection of recurrent caries.
    Nair MK; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; May K
    Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 9438568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. TACT imaging of primary caries.
    Tyndall DA; Clifton TL; Webber RL; Ludlow JB; Horton RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):214-25. PubMed ID: 9269025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. In vitro evaluation of proximal carious lesions using digital radiographic systems.
    Vieira MS; Nogueira CP; Silva MA; Bauer JR; Maia Filho EM
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2015; 2015():631508. PubMed ID: 25695099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Effect of computer assistance on observer performance of approximal caries diagnosis using intraoral digital radiography.
    Araki K; Matsuda Y; Seki K; Okano T
    Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Jun; 14(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 19557443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Factors determining the diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
    Ohki M; Okano T; Nakamura T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 May; 23(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 7835507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. A comparison of a new dental X-ray film, Agfa Gevaert Dentus M4, with Kodak Ektaspeed and Ultraspeed dental X-ray films.
    Svenson B; Lindvall AM; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 8508944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. A comparison of Kodak Ultraspeed and Ektaspeed plus dental X-ray films for the detection of dental caries.
    Wong A; Monsour PA; Moule AJ; Basford KE
    Aust Dent J; 2002 Mar; 47(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 12035954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Utility and effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis of dental caries.
    Tracy KD; Dykstra BA; Gakenheimer DC; Scheetz JP; Lacina S; Scarfe WC; Farman AG
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(2):136-44. PubMed ID: 21903524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Assessment of a new processor containing a self-cleaning synthetic-web transport mechanism.
    Svenson B; Petersson A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 8508937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Discrimination between restorative dental materials by their radiopacity measured in film radiographs and digital images.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hørsted-Bindslev P
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1998 Jun; 16(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 9922755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Digital radiography: an overview.
    Parks ET; Williamson GF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2002 Nov; 3(4):23-39. PubMed ID: 12444400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Effect of exposure time on in vitro caries diagnosis using the Digora system.
    Huysmans MC; Hintze H; Wenzel A
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1997 Feb; 105(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 9085024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Correlation between diagnostic accuracy and perceptibility.
    Yoshiura K; Okamura K; Tokumori K; Nakayama E; Chikui T; Goto TK; Shimizu M; Kawazu T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Nov; 34(6):350-2. PubMed ID: 16227477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Comparison of microscopy and radiography as gold standards in radiographic caries diagnosis.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 10740474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Radiographic detection of approximal caries: a comparison between senior dental students and senior dental hygiene students.
    Wojtowicz PA; Brooks SL; Hasson H; Kerschbaum WE; Eklund SA
    J Dent Hyg; 2003; 77(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 15022524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. The efficiency of three different films and radiovisiography in detecting approximal carious lesions.
    Erten H; Akarslan ZZ; Topuz O
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Jan; 36(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 15709499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Visibility of artificial buccal recurrent caries under restorations using different radiographic techniques.
    Murat S; Kamburoğlu K; Isayev A; Kurşun S; Yüksel S
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 22917443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. In vivo study of approximal caries depth on storage phosphor plate images compared with dental x-ray film.
    Versteeg KH; Sanderink GC; Velders XL; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):210-3. PubMed ID: 9269024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The influence of radiographic exposure factors on the diagnosis of occlusal caries.
    Skodje F; Espelid I; Kvile K; Tveit AB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 9656870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Approximal caries diagnosis after data import from different digital radiography systems: interobserver agreement and comparison to histological hard-tissue sections.
    Schulte AG; Wittchen A; Stachniss V; Jacquet W; Bottenberg P
    Caries Res; 2008; 42(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 18063865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.