268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9447670)
1. Attenuation and backscatter estimation using video signal analysis applied to B-mode images.
Knipp BS; Zagzebski JA; Wilson TA; Dong F; Madsen EL
Ultrason Imaging; 1997 Jul; 19(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 9447670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Attenuation estimations using envelope echo data: analysis and simulations.
Tu H; Zagzebski J; Chen Q
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 32(3):377-86. PubMed ID: 16530096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of ultrasound attenuation and backscatter estimates in layered tissue-mimicking phantoms among three clinical scanners.
Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Ghoshal G; Pawlicki AD; Madsen EL; Lavarello RJ; Oelze ML; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2012 Oct; 34(4):209-21. PubMed ID: 23160474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Instrument-independent acoustic backscatter coefficient imaging.
Boote EJ; Zagzebski JA; Madsen EL; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 1988 Apr; 10(2):121-38. PubMed ID: 3057712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simultaneous backscatter and attenuation estimation using a least squares method with constraints.
Nam K; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Dec; 37(12):2096-104. PubMed ID: 21963038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic changes of integrated backscatter, attenuation coefficient and bubble activities during high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment.
Zhang S; Wan M; Zhong H; Xu C; Liao Z; Liu H; Wang S
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1828-44. PubMed ID: 19716225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter coefficient estimates of rodent-tumor-mimicking structures: comparison of results among clinical scanners.
Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Pawlicki AD; Kumar V; Madsen EL; Ghoshal G; Lavarello RJ; Oelze ML; Bigelow TA; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2011 Oct; 33(4):233-50. PubMed ID: 22518954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Power Spectrum Consistency among Systems and Transducers.
Guerrero QW; Fan L; Brunke S; Milkowski A; Rosado-Mendez IM; Hall TJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 44(11):2358-2370. PubMed ID: 30093341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative assessment of in vivo breast masses using ultrasound attenuation and backscatter.
Nam K; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Apr; 35(2):146-61. PubMed ID: 23493613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the impact of backscatter intensity variations on ultrasound attenuation estimation.
Omari EA; Varghese T; Madsen EL; Frank G
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):082904. PubMed ID: 23927359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A method for estimating an overlying layer correction in quantitative ultrasound imaging.
Lu ZF; Zagzebski JA; Madsen EL; Dong F
Ultrason Imaging; 1995 Oct; 17(4):269-90. PubMed ID: 8677562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trade-offs in data acquisition and processing parameters for backscatter and scatterer size estimations.
Liu W; Zagzebski JA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010; 57(2):340-52. PubMed ID: 20178900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimation of ultrasound attenuation from broadband echo-signals using bandpass filtering.
Kim H; Zagzebski JA; Varghese T
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 May; 55(5):1153-9. PubMed ID: 18519224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-frequency ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter coefficients of in vivo normal human dermis and subcutaneous fat.
Raju BI; Srinivasan MA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 27(11):1543-56. PubMed ID: 11750754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cross-imaging system comparison of backscatter coefficient estimates from a tissue-mimicking material.
Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Kumar V; Madsen EL; Ghoshal G; Pawlicki AD; Oelze ML; Lavarello RJ; Bigelow TA; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1319-24. PubMed ID: 22978860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Statistical uncertainty in ultrasonic backscatter and attenuation coefficients determined with a reference phantom.
Yao LX; Zagzebski JA; Madsen EL
Ultrasound Med Biol; 1991; 17(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 2053215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative ultrasound imaging: in vivo results in normal liver.
Zagzebski JA; Lu ZF; Yao LX
Ultrason Imaging; 1993 Oct; 15(4):335-51. PubMed ID: 8171756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Theoretical and phantom based investigation of the impact of sound speed and backscatter variations on attenuation slope estimation.
Omari E; Lee H; Varghese T
Ultrasonics; 2011 Aug; 51(6):758-67. PubMed ID: 21477832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monitoring imaging of lesions induced by high intensity focused ultrasound based on differential ultrasonic attenuation and integrated backscatter estimation.
Zhong H; Wan MX; Jiang YF; Wang SP
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 33(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 17189050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Method for estimating total attenuation from a spatial map of attenuation slope for quantitative ultrasound imaging.
Pawlicki AD; O'Brien WD
Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Apr; 35(2):162-72. PubMed ID: 23493614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
