169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9448754)
1. Imaging articular cartilage defects with 3D fat-suppressed echo planar imaging: comparison with conventional 3D fat-suppressed gradient echo sequence and correlation with histology.
Trattnig S; Huber M; Breitenseher MJ; Trnka HJ; Rand T; Kaider A; Helbich T; Imhof H; Resnick D
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 9448754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Imaging articular cartilage defects in the ankle joint with 3D fat-suppressed echo planar imaging: comparison with conventional 3D fat-suppressed gradient echo imaging.
Ba-Ssalamah A; Schibany N; Puig S; Herneth AM; Noebauer-Huhmann IM; Trattnig S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Aug; 16(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 12203770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fat-suppressed 3D-T1-weighted-echo planar imaging: comparison with fat-suppressed 3D-T1-weighted-gradient echo in imaging the cartilage of the knee.
Karantanas AH; Zibis AH; Kitsoulis P
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2002; 26(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 11918977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differentiation between grade 3 and grade 4 articular cartilage defects of the knee: fat-suppressed proton density-weighted versus fat-suppressed three-dimensional gradient-echo MRI.
Lee SY; Jee WH; Kim SK; Koh IJ; Kim JM
Acta Radiol; 2010 May; 51(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 20350249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy.
Disler DG; McCauley TR; Wirth CR; Fuchs MD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 7618561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: technique optimization and comparison with conventional MR imaging.
Disler DG; Peters TL; Muscoreil SJ; Ratner LM; Wagle WA; Cousins JP; Rifkin MD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):887-92. PubMed ID: 8092029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Magnetic resonance study of patellofemoral cartilage with a fat-suppressed T1-3D gradient-echo sequence: a comparison with other acquisition technics at medium field strength].
Cardone G; Minio Paluello GB; Lo Presti G; Gagliardo O; Gallucci M; Castrucci M
Radiol Med; 1997 Sep; 94(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 9446117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cartilage destruction in small joints by rheumatoid arthritis: assessment of fat-suppressed three-dimensional gradient-echo MR pulse sequences in vitro.
Uhl M; Allmann KH; Ihling C; Hauer MP; Conca W; Langer M
Skeletal Radiol; 1998 Dec; 27(12):677-82. PubMed ID: 9921929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. IDEAL 3D spoiled gradient echo of the articular cartilage of the knee on 3.0 T MRI: a comparison with conventional 3.0 T fast spin-echo T2 fat saturation image.
Han CH; Park HJ; Lee SY; Chung EC; Choi SH; Yun JS; Rho MH
Acta Radiol; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1479-86. PubMed ID: 25348476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Articular cartilage grading of the knee: diagnostic performance of fat-suppressed 3D volume isotropic turbo spin-echo acquisition (VISTA) compared with 3D T1 high-resolution isovolumetric examination (THRIVE).
Lee YH; Hahn S; Lim D; Suh JS
Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):190-196. PubMed ID: 27207633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fat-suppressed 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo imaging of the cartilage with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination.
Zheng ZZ; Shan H; Li X
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 May; 194(5):W414-9. PubMed ID: 20410387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bilaminar pattern of tibial condyle cartilage layer on the fat-suppressed 3D gradient echo images: artifact or structural and biochemical difference in composition of cartilage?
Trattnig S; Mlynárik V; Jung B; Bader T; Sulzbacher I; Herneth A; Gaisch R; Puig S
Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Feb; 19(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 11358656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility of an Inversion Recovery-Prepared Fat-Saturated Zero Echo Time Sequence for High Contrast Imaging of the Osteochondral Junction.
Jang H; Ma Y; Carl M; Lombardi AF; Chang EY; Du J
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():777080. PubMed ID: 35002964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Discrimination between fluid, synovium, and cartilage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: contrast enhanced Spin Echo versus non-contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed Gradient Echo MR imaging.
Rand T; Imhof H; Czerny C; Breitenseher M; Machold K; Turetschek K; Trattnig S
Clin Radiol; 1999 Feb; 54(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 10050739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients.
Bredella MA; Tirman PF; Peterfy CG; Zarlingo M; Feller JF; Bost FW; Belzer JP; Wischer TK; Genant HK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Apr; 172(4):1073-80. PubMed ID: 10587150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of PD BLADE with fat saturation (FS), PD FS and T2 3D DESS with water excitation (WE) in detecting articular knee cartilage defects.
Lavdas E; Topalzikis T; Mavroidis P; Kyriakis I; Roka V; Kostopoulos S; Glotsos D; Zilidis C; Stathakis S; Tsagkalis A; Papanikolaou N; Batsikas G; Arvanitis DL; Vassiou K
Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 31(8):1255-62. PubMed ID: 23876261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of 3D vs. 2D fast spin echo imaging for evaluation of articular cartilage in the knee on a 3T system scientific research.
Milewski MD; Smitaman E; Moukaddam H; Katz LD; Essig DA; Medvecky MJ; Haims AH
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1637-43. PubMed ID: 21683539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities.
Recht MP; Piraino DW; Paletta GA; Schils JP; Belhobek GH
Radiology; 1996 Jan; 198(1):209-12. PubMed ID: 8539380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy.
Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Hargreaves BA; Steines D; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Winalski CS; Lang P
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):857-64. PubMed ID: 15503323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MRI findings in injured articular cartilage of the knee correlated with surgical findings.
Li XM; Peng WJ; Wu H; Kacher D; Xia LM; Ai F; Li F; Xiong W
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Nov; 122(21):2624-30. PubMed ID: 19951582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
