These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9448754)

  • 1. Imaging articular cartilage defects with 3D fat-suppressed echo planar imaging: comparison with conventional 3D fat-suppressed gradient echo sequence and correlation with histology.
    Trattnig S; Huber M; Breitenseher MJ; Trnka HJ; Rand T; Kaider A; Helbich T; Imhof H; Resnick D
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 9448754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Imaging articular cartilage defects in the ankle joint with 3D fat-suppressed echo planar imaging: comparison with conventional 3D fat-suppressed gradient echo imaging.
    Ba-Ssalamah A; Schibany N; Puig S; Herneth AM; Noebauer-Huhmann IM; Trattnig S
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Aug; 16(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 12203770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fat-suppressed 3D-T1-weighted-echo planar imaging: comparison with fat-suppressed 3D-T1-weighted-gradient echo in imaging the cartilage of the knee.
    Karantanas AH; Zibis AH; Kitsoulis P
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2002; 26(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 11918977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differentiation between grade 3 and grade 4 articular cartilage defects of the knee: fat-suppressed proton density-weighted versus fat-suppressed three-dimensional gradient-echo MRI.
    Lee SY; Jee WH; Kim SK; Koh IJ; Kim JM
    Acta Radiol; 2010 May; 51(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 20350249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy.
    Disler DG; McCauley TR; Wirth CR; Fuchs MD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 7618561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: technique optimization and comparison with conventional MR imaging.
    Disler DG; Peters TL; Muscoreil SJ; Ratner LM; Wagle WA; Cousins JP; Rifkin MD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):887-92. PubMed ID: 8092029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Magnetic resonance study of patellofemoral cartilage with a fat-suppressed T1-3D gradient-echo sequence: a comparison with other acquisition technics at medium field strength].
    Cardone G; Minio Paluello GB; Lo Presti G; Gagliardo O; Gallucci M; Castrucci M
    Radiol Med; 1997 Sep; 94(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 9446117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cartilage destruction in small joints by rheumatoid arthritis: assessment of fat-suppressed three-dimensional gradient-echo MR pulse sequences in vitro.
    Uhl M; Allmann KH; Ihling C; Hauer MP; Conca W; Langer M
    Skeletal Radiol; 1998 Dec; 27(12):677-82. PubMed ID: 9921929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. IDEAL 3D spoiled gradient echo of the articular cartilage of the knee on 3.0 T MRI: a comparison with conventional 3.0 T fast spin-echo T2 fat saturation image.
    Han CH; Park HJ; Lee SY; Chung EC; Choi SH; Yun JS; Rho MH
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1479-86. PubMed ID: 25348476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Articular cartilage grading of the knee: diagnostic performance of fat-suppressed 3D volume isotropic turbo spin-echo acquisition (VISTA) compared with 3D T1 high-resolution isovolumetric examination (THRIVE).
    Lee YH; Hahn S; Lim D; Suh JS
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):190-196. PubMed ID: 27207633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fat-suppressed 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo imaging of the cartilage with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination.
    Zheng ZZ; Shan H; Li X
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 May; 194(5):W414-9. PubMed ID: 20410387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bilaminar pattern of tibial condyle cartilage layer on the fat-suppressed 3D gradient echo images: artifact or structural and biochemical difference in composition of cartilage?
    Trattnig S; Mlynárik V; Jung B; Bader T; Sulzbacher I; Herneth A; Gaisch R; Puig S
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Feb; 19(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 11358656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feasibility of an Inversion Recovery-Prepared Fat-Saturated Zero Echo Time Sequence for High Contrast Imaging of the Osteochondral Junction.
    Jang H; Ma Y; Carl M; Lombardi AF; Chang EY; Du J
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():777080. PubMed ID: 35002964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrimination between fluid, synovium, and cartilage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: contrast enhanced Spin Echo versus non-contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed Gradient Echo MR imaging.
    Rand T; Imhof H; Czerny C; Breitenseher M; Machold K; Turetschek K; Trattnig S
    Clin Radiol; 1999 Feb; 54(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 10050739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients.
    Bredella MA; Tirman PF; Peterfy CG; Zarlingo M; Feller JF; Bost FW; Belzer JP; Wischer TK; Genant HK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Apr; 172(4):1073-80. PubMed ID: 10587150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of PD BLADE with fat saturation (FS), PD FS and T2 3D DESS with water excitation (WE) in detecting articular knee cartilage defects.
    Lavdas E; Topalzikis T; Mavroidis P; Kyriakis I; Roka V; Kostopoulos S; Glotsos D; Zilidis C; Stathakis S; Tsagkalis A; Papanikolaou N; Batsikas G; Arvanitis DL; Vassiou K
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 31(8):1255-62. PubMed ID: 23876261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of 3D vs. 2D fast spin echo imaging for evaluation of articular cartilage in the knee on a 3T system scientific research.
    Milewski MD; Smitaman E; Moukaddam H; Katz LD; Essig DA; Medvecky MJ; Haims AH
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1637-43. PubMed ID: 21683539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities.
    Recht MP; Piraino DW; Paletta GA; Schils JP; Belhobek GH
    Radiology; 1996 Jan; 198(1):209-12. PubMed ID: 8539380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy.
    Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Hargreaves BA; Steines D; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Winalski CS; Lang P
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):857-64. PubMed ID: 15503323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MRI findings in injured articular cartilage of the knee correlated with surgical findings.
    Li XM; Peng WJ; Wu H; Kacher D; Xia LM; Ai F; Li F; Xiong W
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Nov; 122(21):2624-30. PubMed ID: 19951582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.