253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9448765)
21. Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer.
Meyenberger C; Huch Böni RA; Bertschinger P; Zala GF; Klotz HP; Krestin GP
Endoscopy; 1995 Sep; 27(7):469-79. PubMed ID: 8565885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma by magnetic resonance imaging with a pelvic phased-array coil.
Hadfield MB; Nicholson AA; MacDonald AW; Farouk R; Lee PW; Duthie GS; Monson JR
Br J Surg; 1997 Apr; 84(4):529-31. PubMed ID: 9112909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Preoperative 3T MR imaging of rectal cancer: local staging accuracy using a two-dimensional and three-dimensional T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence.
Fütterer JJ; Yakar D; Strijk SP; Barentsz JO
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 18164156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. USPIO-enhanced MRI for preoperative staging of gynecological pelvic tumors: preliminary results.
Keller TM; Michel SC; Fröhlich J; Fink D; Caduff R; Marincek B; Kubik-Huch RA
Eur Radiol; 2004 Jun; 14(6):937-44. PubMed ID: 14991323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Endorectal ultrasonography versus phased-array magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
Halefoglu AM; Yildirim S; Avlanmis O; Sakiz D; Baykan A
World J Gastroenterol; 2008 Jun; 14(22):3504-10. PubMed ID: 18567078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [MRI of prostate cancer using three different coil systems: image quality, tumor detection, and staging].
Beyersdorff D; Darsow U; Stephan C; Schnorr D; Loening S; Taupitz M
Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 12811693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Fast dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of cervical carcinoma.
Van Vierzen PB; Massuger LF; Ruys SH; Barentsz JO
Clin Radiol; 1998 Mar; 53(3):183-92. PubMed ID: 9528868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Parametrial invasion in cervical carcinoma: evaluation of detection at MR imaging with fat suppression.
Scheidler J; Heuck AF; Steinborn M; Kimmig R; Reiser MF
Radiology; 1998 Jan; 206(1):125-9. PubMed ID: 9423661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Local staging of rectal cancer using combined pelvic phased-array and endorectal coil MRI.
Tatli S; Mortele KJ; Breen EL; Bleday R; Silverman SG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Apr; 23(4):534-40. PubMed ID: 16523466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The usefulness of MRI and PET imaging for the detection of parametrial involvement and lymph node metastasis in patients with cervical cancer.
Park W; Park YJ; Huh SJ; Kim BG; Bae DS; Lee J; Kim BH; Choi JY; Ahn YC; Lim DH
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2005 May; 35(5):260-4. PubMed ID: 15886267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prediction of nodal involvement in primary rectal carcinoma without invasion to pelvic structures: accuracy of preoperative CT, MR, and DWIBS assessments relative to histopathologic findings.
Zhou J; Zhan S; Zhu Q; Gong H; Wang Y; Fan D; Gong Z; Huang Y
PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e92779. PubMed ID: 24695111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison between endorectal coil and pelvic phased-array coil magnetic resonance imaging in patients with anorectal tumor.
Matsuoka H; Nakamura A; Masaki T; Sugiyama M; Takahara T; Hachiya J; Atomi Y
Am J Surg; 2003 Apr; 185(4):328-32. PubMed ID: 12657384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison between 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and multi-detector row computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer.
Kim CK; Kim SH; Choi D; Kim MJ; Chun HK; Lee SJ; Lee JM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(6):853-9. PubMed ID: 18043346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Pelvic adenopathy in prostatic and urinary bladder carcinoma: MR imaging with a three-dimensional TI-weighted magnetization-prepared-rapid gradient-echo sequence.
Jager GJ; Barentsz JO; Oosterhof GO; Witjes JA; Ruijs SJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Dec; 167(6):1503-7. PubMed ID: 8956585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Does quantification of USPIO uptake-related signal loss allow differentiation of benign and malignant normal-sized pelvic lymph nodes?
Froehlich JM; Triantafyllou M; Fleischmann A; Vermathen P; Thalmann GN; Thoeny HC
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2012; 7(3):346-55. PubMed ID: 22539405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Noninvasive nodal staging in patients with breast cancer using gadofosveset-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study.
Schipper RJ; Smidt ML; van Roozendaal LM; Castro CJ; de Vries B; Heuts EM; Keymeulen KB; Wildberger JE; Lobbes MB; Beets-Tan RG
Invest Radiol; 2013 Mar; 48(3):134-9. PubMed ID: 23262788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Carcinoma of the uterine cervix. High-resolution turbo spin-echo MR imaging with contrast-enhanced dynamic scanning and T2-weighting.
Abe Y; Yamashita Y; Namimoto T; Takahashi M; Katabuchi H; Tanaka N; Okamura H
Acta Radiol; 1998 May; 39(3):322-6. PubMed ID: 9571952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma.
Yang WT; Lam WW; Yu MY; Cheung TH; Metreweli C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Sep; 175(3):759-66. PubMed ID: 10954463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dynamic MRI of bladder cancer: evaluation of staging accuracy.
Tekes A; Kamel I; Imam K; Szarf G; Schoenberg M; Nasir K; Thompson R; Bluemke D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jan; 184(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 15615961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. MRI of prostate cancer at 1.5 and 3.0 T: comparison of image quality in tumor detection and staging.
Beyersdorff D; Taymoorian K; Knösel T; Schnorr D; Felix R; Hamm B; Bruhn H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Nov; 185(5):1214-20. PubMed ID: 16247137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
