670 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9448779)
21. A phantom study of the accuracy of CT, MR and PET image registrations with a block matching-based algorithm.
Isambert A; Bonniaud G; Lavielle F; Malandain G; Lefkopoulos D
Cancer Radiother; 2008 Dec; 12(8):800-8. PubMed ID: 18571453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Acceptance test of a commercially available software for automatic image registration of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 99mTc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile (MIBI) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) brain images.
Loi G; Dominietto M; Manfredda I; Mones E; Carriero A; Inglese E; Krengli M; Brambilla M
J Digit Imaging; 2008 Sep; 21(3):329-37. PubMed ID: 17549564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of MRI and cannabinoid type 1 receptor PET templates constructed using DARTEL for spatial normalization of rat brains.
Kronfeld A; Buchholz HG; Maus S; Reuss S; Müller-Forell W; Lutz B; Schreckenberger M; Miederer I
Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):6875-84. PubMed ID: 26632044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy of deformable image registration on magnetic resonance images in digital and physical phantoms.
Ger RB; Yang J; Ding Y; Jacobsen MC; Fuller CD; Howell RM; Li H; Jason Stafford R; Zhou S; Court LE
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5153-5161. PubMed ID: 28622410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. PET-MR image fusion in soft tissue sarcoma: accuracy, reliability and practicality of interactive point-based and automated mutual information techniques.
Somer EJ; Marsden PK; Benatar NA; Goodey J; O'Doherty MJ; Smith MA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Jan; 30(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 12483410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Image registration accuracy of GammaPlan: a phantom study.
Watanabe Y; Han E
J Neurosurg; 2008 Dec; 109 Suppl():21-4. PubMed ID: 19123884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Mean regional cerebral blood flow images of normal subjects using technetium-99m-HMPAO by automated image registration.
Imran MB; Kawashima R; Sato K; Kinomura S; Ito H; Koyama M; Goto R; Ono S; Yoshioka S; Fukuda H
J Nucl Med; 1998 Jan; 39(1):203-7. PubMed ID: 9443762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Fast nonsupervised 3D registration of PET and MR images of the brain.
Mangin JF; Frouin V; Bloch I; Bendriem B; Lopez-Krahe J
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 1994 Sep; 14(5):749-62. PubMed ID: 8063871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Fast and robust registration of PET and MR images of human brain.
Cízek J; Herholz K; Vollmar S; Schrader R; Klein J; Heiss WD
Neuroimage; 2004 May; 22(1):434-42. PubMed ID: 15110036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Model-independent, multimodality deformable image registration by local matching of anatomical features and minimization of elastic energy.
Söhn M; Birkner M; Chi Y; Wang J; Di Y; Berger B; Alber M
Med Phys; 2008 Mar; 35(3):866-78. PubMed ID: 18404923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quantitative comparison of algorithms for inter-subject registration of 3D volumetric brain MRI scans.
Ardekani BA; Guckemus S; Bachman A; Hoptman MJ; Wojtaszek M; Nierenberg J
J Neurosci Methods; 2005 Mar; 142(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 15652618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Integrated PET/MR imaging: automatic attenuation correction of flexible RF coils.
Kartmann R; Paulus DH; Braun H; Aklan B; Ziegler S; Navalpakkam BK; Lentschig M; Quick HH
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):082301. PubMed ID: 23927344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Matching PET and CT scans of the head and neck area: development of method and validation.
Klabbers BM; de Munck JC; Slotman BJ; Langendijk HA; de Bree R; Hoekstra OS; Boellaard R; Lammertsma AA
Med Phys; 2002 Oct; 29(10):2230-8. PubMed ID: 12408296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Validation of an MRI/PET landmark registration method using 3D simulated PET images and point simulations.
Neelin P; Crossman J; Hawkes DJ; Ma Y; Evans AC
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1993; 17(4-5):351-6. PubMed ID: 8306309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of anatomy based reconstruction for partial volume correction in brain FDG-PET.
Baete K; Nuyts J; Van Laere K; Van Paesschen W; Ceyssens S; De Ceuninck L; Gheysens O; Kelles A; Van den Eynden J; Suetens P; Dupont P
Neuroimage; 2004 Sep; 23(1):305-17. PubMed ID: 15325378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quantitative and clinical analysis of SPECT image registration for epilepsy studies.
Brinkmann BH; O'Brien TJ; Aharon S; O'Connor MK; Mullan BP; Hanson DP; Robb RA
J Nucl Med; 1999 Jul; 40(7):1098-105. PubMed ID: 10405126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Construction and evaluation of multitracer small-animal PET probabilistic atlases for voxel-based functional mapping of the rat brain.
Casteels C; Vermaelen P; Nuyts J; Van Der Linden A; Baekelandt V; Mortelmans L; Bormans G; Van Laere K
J Nucl Med; 2006 Nov; 47(11):1858-66. PubMed ID: 17079820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Registration of functional and anatomical MRI: accuracy assessment and application in navigated neurosurgery.
Rohlfing T; West JB; Beier J; Liebig T; Taschner CA; Thomale UW
Comput Aided Surg; 2000; 5(6):414-25. PubMed ID: 11295854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Four-dimensional image registration for image-guided radiotherapy.
Schreibmann E; Thorndyke B; Li T; Wang J; Xing L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jun; 71(2):578-86. PubMed ID: 18374499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The need for application-based adaptation of deformable image registration.
Kirby N; Chuang C; Ueda U; Pouliot J
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011702. PubMed ID: 23298072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]