412 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9448780)
1. Automated image registration: II. Intersubject validation of linear and nonlinear models.
Woods RP; Grafton ST; Watson JD; Sicotte NL; Mazziotta JC
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(1):153-65. PubMed ID: 9448780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A method for assessing the accuracy of intersubject registration of the human brain using anatomic landmarks.
Grachev ID; Berdichevsky D; Rauch SL; Heckers S; Kennedy DN; Caviness VS; Alpert NM
Neuroimage; 1999 Feb; 9(2):250-68. PubMed ID: 9927554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation.
Woods RP; Grafton ST; Holmes CJ; Cherry SR; Mazziotta JC
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(1):139-52. PubMed ID: 9448779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of MRI and cannabinoid type 1 receptor PET templates constructed using DARTEL for spatial normalization of rat brains.
Kronfeld A; Buchholz HG; Maus S; Reuss S; Müller-Forell W; Lutz B; Schreckenberger M; Miederer I
Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):6875-84. PubMed ID: 26632044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Creation and use of a Talairach-compatible atlas for accurate, automated, nonlinear intersubject registration, and analysis of functional imaging data.
Woods RP; Dapretto M; Sicotte NL; Toga AW; Mazziotta JC
Hum Brain Mapp; 1999; 8(2-3):73-9. PubMed ID: 10524595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Construction and evaluation of multitracer small-animal PET probabilistic atlases for voxel-based functional mapping of the rat brain.
Casteels C; Vermaelen P; Nuyts J; Van Der Linden A; Baekelandt V; Mortelmans L; Bormans G; Van Laere K
J Nucl Med; 2006 Nov; 47(11):1858-66. PubMed ID: 17079820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anatomic validation of spatial normalization methods for PET.
Sugiura M; Kawashima R; Sadato N; Senda M; Kanno I; Oda K; Sato K; Yonekura Y; Fukuda H
J Nucl Med; 1999 Feb; 40(2):317-22. PubMed ID: 10025841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated 3-dimensional registration of stand-alone (18)F-FDG whole-body PET with CT.
Slomka PJ; Dey D; Przetak C; Aladl UE; Baum RP
J Nucl Med; 2003 Jul; 44(7):1156-67. PubMed ID: 12843232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space.
Collins DL; Neelin P; Peters TM; Evans AC
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1994; 18(2):192-205. PubMed ID: 8126267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of piece-wise linear, linear, and nonlinear atlas-to-patient warping techniques: analysis of the labeling of subcortical nuclei for functional neurosurgical applications.
Chakravarty MM; Sadikot AF; Germann J; Hellier P; Bertrand G; Collins DL
Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Nov; 30(11):3574-95. PubMed ID: 19387981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative comparisons of image registration techniques based on high-resolution MRI of the brain.
Strother SC; Anderson JR; Xu XL; Liow JS; Bonar DC; Rottenberg DA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1994; 18(6):954-62. PubMed ID: 7962808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retrospective registration of PET and MR brain images: an algorithm and its stereotactic validation.
Ge Y; Fitzpatrick JM; Votaw JR; Gadamsetty S; Maciunas RJ; Kessler RM; Margolin RA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1994; 18(5):800-10. PubMed ID: 8089332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhancing the multivariate signal of [15O] water PET studies with a new nonlinear neuroanatomical registration algorithm.
Kjems U; Strother SC; Anderson J; Law I; Hansen LK
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Apr; 18(4):306-19. PubMed ID: 10385288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. PET-MR image fusion in soft tissue sarcoma: accuracy, reliability and practicality of interactive point-based and automated mutual information techniques.
Somer EJ; Marsden PK; Benatar NA; Goodey J; O'Doherty MJ; Smith MA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Jan; 30(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 12483410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of two nonlinear registration techniques to investigate brain atrophy patterns in normal aging.
Pu F; Xu L; Li D; Fan Y; Niu H; Li S
J Neuroradiol; 2013 Dec; 40(5):326-34. PubMed ID: 23602532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mean regional cerebral blood flow images of normal subjects using technetium-99m-HMPAO by automated image registration.
Imran MB; Kawashima R; Sato K; Kinomura S; Ito H; Koyama M; Goto R; Ono S; Yoshioka S; Fukuda H
J Nucl Med; 1998 Jan; 39(1):203-7. PubMed ID: 9443762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of manual vs. automated multimodality (CT-MRI) image registration for brain tumors.
Sarkar A; Santiago RJ; Smith R; Kassaee A
Med Dosim; 2005; 30(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 15749007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved methods for image registration.
Alpert NM; Berdichevsky D; Levin Z; Morris ED; Fischman AJ
Neuroimage; 1996 Feb; 3(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 9345471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Subcortical, cerebellar, and magnetic resonance based consistent brain image registration.
Magnotta VA; Bockholt HJ; Johnson HJ; Christensen GE; Andreasen NC
Neuroimage; 2003 Jun; 19(2 Pt 1):233-45. PubMed ID: 12814574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Iterative Principal Axes Registration method for analysis of MR-PET brain images.
Dhawan AP; Arata LK; Levy AV; Mantil J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Nov; 42(11):1079-87. PubMed ID: 7498911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
