These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9450311)

  • 1. Preliminary study of relations between physical characteristics and psychological impressions of natural voices.
    Hieda I; Kuchinomachi Y
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Dec; 85(3 Pt 2):1483-91. PubMed ID: 9450311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of perceptual training based upon synthesized voice signals.
    Martin DP; Wolfe VI
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Dec; 83(3 Pt 2):1291-8. PubMed ID: 9017742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Processing female and male voices: a word spotting experiment.
    Pépiot E
    Percept Mot Skills; 2013 Dec; 117(3):903-12. PubMed ID: 24665806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of femininity and averageness of voice pitch in aesthetic judgments of women's voices.
    Feinberg DR; DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Perrett DI
    Perception; 2008; 37(4):615-23. PubMed ID: 18546667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Synthetic and natural speech preferences of male and female listeners in four age groups.
    Mirenda P; Eicher D; Beukelman DR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Mar; 32(1):175-83. PubMed ID: 2523007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Low Vocal Pitch Preference Drives First Impressions Irrespective of Context in Male Voices but Not in Female Voices.
    Tsantani MS; Belin P; Paterson HM; McAleer P
    Perception; 2016 Aug; 45(8):946-963. PubMed ID: 27081101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of analogy instruction for pitch variation on perceptual ratings of other speech parameters.
    Tse AC; Wong AW; Ma EP; Whitehill TL; Masters RS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Jun; 56(3):906-12. PubMed ID: 23811473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Voice perceptions and quality of life of transgender people.
    Hancock AB; Krissinger J; Owen K
    J Voice; 2011 Sep; 25(5):553-8. PubMed ID: 21051199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Verification of impression of voice in relation to occupational categories.
    Yamada N; Hakoda Y; Yuda E; Kusuhara A
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Jun; 86(3 Pt 2):1249-63. PubMed ID: 10932591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A large-scale comparison of two voice synthesis techniques on intelligibility, naturalness, preferences, and attitudes toward voices banked by individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
    Hyppa-Martin J; Lilley J; Chen M; Friese J; Schmidt C; Bunnell HT
    Augment Altern Commun; 2024 Mar; 40(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 37791834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gender categorization in cochlear implant users.
    Massida Z; Marx M; Belin P; James C; Fraysse B; Barone P; Deguine O
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1389-401. PubMed ID: 24023381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sex-related differences in vocal responses to pitch feedback perturbations during sustained vocalization.
    Chen Z; Liu P; Jones JA; Huang D; Liu H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):EL355-60. PubMed ID: 21218857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Voice banking to support individuals who use speech-generating devices: development and evaluation of Singaporean-accented English synthetic voices and a Singapore Colloquial English recording inventory.
    Chen M; Hyppa-Martin J; Bunnell HT; Lilley J; Foo C; Tan HW; Lim WS
    Augment Altern Commun; 2023 Dec; 39(4):208-218. PubMed ID: 36971387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preferences for very low and very high voice pitch in humans.
    Re DE; O'Connor JJ; Bennett PJ; Feinberg DR
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e32719. PubMed ID: 22403701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Voice gender perception by cochlear implantees.
    Kovacić D; Balaban E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Aug; 126(2):762-75. PubMed ID: 19640042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Noise and tremor in the perception of vocal aging in males.
    Harnsberger JD; Brown WS; Shrivastav R; Rothman H
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):523-30. PubMed ID: 19815378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. DECtalk and VeriVox: intelligibility, likeability, and rate preference differences for four listener groups.
    Von Berg S; Panorska A; Uken D; Qeadan F
    Augment Altern Commun; 2009 Mar; 25(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 19280420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Male and female voices activate distinct regions in the male brain.
    Sokhi DS; Hunter MD; Wilkinson ID; Woodruff PW
    Neuroimage; 2005 Sep; 27(3):572-8. PubMed ID: 15978839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Voice similarity in identical twins.
    Van Gysel WD; Vercammen J; Debruyne F
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 2001; 55(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 11256192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.