These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9450311)

  • 21. Perceptions of human attractiveness comprising face and voice cues.
    Wells T; Baguley T; Sergeant M; Dunn A
    Arch Sex Behav; 2013 Jul; 42(5):805-11. PubMed ID: 23358855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Gender-specific sensitivity to low frequencies in male speech.
    Hunter MD; Phang SY; Lee KH; Woodruff PW
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Mar; 375(3):148-50. PubMed ID: 15694249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Discrimination functions: can they be used to classify singing voices?
    Erickson ML; Perry S; Handel S
    J Voice; 2001 Dec; 15(4):492-502. PubMed ID: 11792025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sex matters: Neural correlates of voice gender perception.
    Junger J; Pauly K; Bröhr S; Birkholz P; Neuschaefer-Rube C; Kohler C; Schneider F; Derntl B; Habel U
    Neuroimage; 2013 Oct; 79():275-87. PubMed ID: 23660030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The use of male or female voices in warnings systems: a question of acoustics.
    Edworthy J; Hellier E; Rivers J
    Noise Health; 2003; 6(21):39-50. PubMed ID: 14965452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Training listeners to report the acoustic correlate of formant-frequency scaling using synthetic voices.
    Barreda S; Nearey TM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):1065-77. PubMed ID: 23363122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The emotional quality of speech in voice services.
    Maffiolo V; Chateau N
    Ergonomics; 2003 Oct 20-Nov 15; 46(13-14):1375-85. PubMed ID: 14612326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cepstral analysis of sexually appealing voice.
    Balasubramanium RK; Bhat JS; Srivastava M; Eldose A
    J Voice; 2012 Jul; 26(4):412-5. PubMed ID: 21724369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reliability in perceptual analysis of voice quality.
    Bele IV
    J Voice; 2005 Dec; 19(4):555-73. PubMed ID: 16301102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Perceptions of Competence, Strength, and Age Influence Voters to Select Leaders with Lower-Pitched Voices.
    Klofstad CA; Anderson RC; Nowicki S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133779. PubMed ID: 26252894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: effects of voice characteristics and number of talkers.
    Brungart DS; Chang PS; Simpson BD; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4006-22. PubMed ID: 19507982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. What makes a good voice for radio: perceptions of radio employers and educators.
    Warhurst S; McCabe P; Madill C
    J Voice; 2013 Mar; 27(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 23159029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Selection of a voice for a speech signal for personalized warnings: the effect of speaker's gender and voice pitch.
    Machado S; Duarte E; Teles J; Reis L; Rebelo F
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():3592-8. PubMed ID: 22317268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Some perceptual dimensions and acoustical correlates of pathologic voices.
    Takahashi H; Koike Y
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1976; 338():1-24. PubMed ID: 1067735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Voice recognition: effects of orienting task, and a test of blind versus sighted listeners.
    Winograd E; Kerr NH; Spence MJ
    Am J Psychol; 1984; 97(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 6721008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Gender and chronic tinnitus: differences in tinnitus-related distress depend on age and duration of tinnitus.
    Seydel C; Haupt H; Olze H; Szczepek AJ; Mazurek B
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):661-72. PubMed ID: 23439056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Can listeners hear who is singing? What is the pitch bandwidth of singer discrimination in untrained listeners?
    Erickson ML
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 21889302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Speech technology and cinema: can they learn from each other?
    Pauletto S
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2013 Oct; 38(3):143-50. PubMed ID: 23870066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Human Takes It All: Humanlike Synthesized Voices Are Perceived as Less Eerie and More Likable. Evidence From a Subjective Ratings Study.
    Kühne K; Fischer MH; Zhou Y
    Front Neurorobot; 2020; 14():593732. PubMed ID: 33390923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Nonlinear dynamical analysis of laryngeal, esophageal, and tracheoesophageal speech of Cantonese.
    Yan N; Ng ML; Wang D; Zhang L; Chan V; Ho RS
    J Voice; 2013 Jan; 27(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 23044459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.