These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9450707)
1. Biological warfare and the 'Hiroshima' issue of JAMA. Sapir M JAMA; 1998 Jan; 279(4):274-5. PubMed ID: 9450707 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Biological warfare and the 'Hiroshima' issue of JAMA. Du Val MK JAMA; 1998 Jan; 279(4):274; author reply 275. PubMed ID: 9450706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic experiment by military approved. Cohn V; Hilts PJ Washington Post; 1984 Feb; ():A1, A7. PubMed ID: 11646347 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. FDA seeks public comment on informed consent rules in combat situations. Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(5):43. PubMed ID: 11645003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A military exception to "informed consent": Doe v. Sullivan. Moran PJ St Johns Law Rev; 1993; 66(3):847-63. PubMed ID: 11652729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Nerve gas to the northwest and beyond. Rodgers WH Environ Lett; 1971; 1(2):111-40. PubMed ID: 5140225 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Military medical research: 1. Are there ethical exceptions? Levine C IRB; 1989; 11(4):5-7. PubMed ID: 11650244 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Defense Threat Reduction Agency: a note on the United States' approach to the threat of chemical and biological warfare. Linkie M J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2000; 16(2):531-63. PubMed ID: 10970184 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Justiciability--waiving for the flag: should informed consent rules apply in the context of military emergencies? Seftel SB George Washington Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 60(5):1387-435. PubMed ID: 16086522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Biological and chemical warfare. Secret weapons tests' details revealed. Enserink M Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5593):513-4. PubMed ID: 12386307 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Congressmen say military should have the right to informed consent. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2005 Mar; 20(3):9. PubMed ID: 15856567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Gas and germ warfare renounced but lingers on. Nature; 1970 Nov; 228(5273):707-8. PubMed ID: 5472959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Unlicensed vaccines and bioweapon defense in World War II. Furmanski M JAMA; 1999 Sep; 282(9):822. PubMed ID: 10478686 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The microbiologist and biological defense research. Ethics, politics, and international security. Introduction. Zilinskas RA; Wilson T Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1992 Dec; 666():xi-xvii. PubMed ID: 1297270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. U.S. bio-defenses faulted by GAO. Marshall E Science; 1991 Feb; 251(4993):514. PubMed ID: 1990425 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Walking a thin line: distinguishing between research and medical practice during Operation Desert Storm. Schuchardt EJ Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1993 Nov; (177):9-47. PubMed ID: 10130675 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Japanese germ-war atrocities: a half-century of stonewalling the world. Blumenthal R; Miller J N Y Times Web; 1999 Mar; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11648104 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Military personnel may have been human subjects without their informed consent. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2003 Aug; 18(8):9. PubMed ID: 15119340 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Walking a thin line: distinguishing between research and medical practice during Operation Desert Storm. Schuchardt EJ Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1992; 26(1):77-115. PubMed ID: 11651647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]