393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9450826)
1. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions hearing screening in high-risk newborns.
Salata JA; Jacobson JT; Strasnick B
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1998 Jan; 118(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 9450826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance.
Norton SJ; Gorga MP; Widen JE; Folsom RC; Sininger Y; Cone-Wesson B; Vohr BR; Mascher K; Fletcher K
Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):508-28. PubMed ID: 11059707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening of high-risk infants using distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
Bowes M; Smith C; Tan AK; Varette-Cerre P
J Otolaryngol; 1999 Aug; 28(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 10461253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Newborn hearing screening by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: analysis of response as a function of risk factors.
De Capua B; De Felice C; Costantini D; Bagnoli F; Passali D
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2003 Feb; 23(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 12812130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of two hearing screening protocols in NICU in Shanghai.
Xu ZM; Cheng WX; Yang XL
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Oct; 75(10):1225-9. PubMed ID: 21802153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic validity of dichotic multiple frequencies auditory steady-state responses versus distortion product otoacoustic emissions in hearing screening of high risk neonates.
Mahmoudian S; Farhadi M; Kadivar M; Ghalehbaghi B; Rahimi F; Hemami MR; Kamrava SK; Asghari A; Amintehran E; Mohagheghi P
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Sep; 75(9):1109-16. PubMed ID: 21719120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The performance of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem response in the same ear of the babies in neonatal unit.
Abdul Wahid SN; Md Daud MK; Sidek D; Abd Rahman N; Mansor S; Zakaria MN
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 76(9):1366-9. PubMed ID: 22770594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Audiology characteristics in newborns and infants who failed in the hearing screening by transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions: 89 cases study].
Huang LH; Deng XQ; Yang YL; Wang SJ; Tang XQ; Guo LS; Han DM
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Mar; 46(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 21575409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Otoacoustic emissions for newborn hearing screening].
Liao H; Wu Z; Zhou T
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Feb; 34(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 12764789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Sensitivity of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory brain-stem response in neonatal hearing screening, a comparative study].
Xu ZM; Li J; Hu TZ; Sun JH; Shen XM
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Feb; 83(4):278-80. PubMed ID: 12812641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of currently available devices designed for newborn hearing screening using automated auditory brainstem and/or otoacoustic emission measurements.
Meier S; Narabayashi O; Probst R; Schmuziger N
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Jul; 68(7):927-34. PubMed ID: 15183584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of automated auditory brainstem responses and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions for universal newborn hearing screening.
Korres SG; Balatsouras DG; Lyra C; Kandiloros D; Ferekidis E
Med Sci Monit; 2006 Jun; 12(6):CR260-3. PubMed ID: 16733484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensitivity of the Automated Auditory Brainstem Response in Neonatal Hearing Screening.
Levit Y; Himmelfarb M; Dollberg S
Pediatrics; 2015 Sep; 136(3):e641-7. PubMed ID: 26324873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for neonatal hearing screening in a hospital with high delivery rate.
Ngui LX; Tang IP; Prepageran N; Lai ZW
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 May; 120():184-188. PubMed ID: 30844634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A multicenter evaluation of how many infants with permanent hearing loss pass a two-stage otoacoustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol.
Johnson JL; White KR; Widen JE; Gravel JS; James M; Kennalley T; Maxon AB; Spivak L; Sullivan-Mahoney M; Vohr BR; Weirather Y; Holstrum J
Pediatrics; 2005 Sep; 116(3):663-72. PubMed ID: 16140706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A preliminary study of a hearing screening model for newborn].
Liu Z; Bu X; Xing G; Lu L
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Aug; 36(4):292-4. PubMed ID: 12762000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Otoacoustic emissions and auditory assessment in infants at risk for early brain damage.
Vatovec J; Velickovic Perat M; Smid L; Gros A
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2001 Apr; 58(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 11278022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Values for clinical use.
Bonfils P; Avan P
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1992 Oct; 118(10):1069-76. PubMed ID: 1389058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening strategies for neonatal hearing loss: which test is best?
Dort JC; Tobolski C; Brown D
J Otolaryngol; 2000 Aug; 29(4):206-10. PubMed ID: 11003070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and cochlear microphonics: relationships in patients with and without endolymphatic hydrops.
Fetterman BL
Laryngoscope; 2001 Jun; 111(6):946-54. PubMed ID: 11404602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
