160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9451517)
1. Induction of labor with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone.
Ozgür K; Kizilates A; Uner M; Erman O; Trak B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1997; 261(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 9451517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial.
Chaudhuri S; Mitra SN; Banerjee PK; Biswas PK; Bhattacharyya S
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1564-71. PubMed ID: 21676083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of two different doses of misoprostol suppositories with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Khoury AN; Zhou QP; Gorenberg DM; Nies BM; Manley GE; Mecklenburg FE
J Matern Fetal Med; 2001 Jun; 10(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 11444788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intravaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone as cervical ripening and labor-inducing agents.
Fletcher H; Mitchell S; Frederick J; Simeon D; Brown D
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 83(2):244-7. PubMed ID: 8290188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
Nunes F; Rodrigues R; Meirinho M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 181(3):626-9. PubMed ID: 10486474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical ripening: a randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and an intracervical balloon catheter combined with intravaginal dinoprostone.
Perry KG; Larmon JE; May WL; Robinette LG; Martin RW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 178(6):1333-40. PubMed ID: 9662319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Rahall A; Jones MM; Goodwin TM; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1811-6. PubMed ID: 7778637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel (Prepidil gel): randomized comparison.
Chuck FJ; Huffaker BJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Oct; 173(4):1137-42. PubMed ID: 7485307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oral and vaginal misoprostol compared with dinoprostone for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial.
le Roux PA; Olarogun JO; Penny J; Anthony J
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 11814497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Neiger R; Greaves PC
Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Oral misoprostol and intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized comparison.
O'Flaherty L
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2001; 46(3):203-4. PubMed ID: 11480753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for ripening of unfavorable cervix and labor induction.
Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Pokpirom J
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1997 Aug; 23(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9311179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Chang CH; Chang FM
J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy and safety of intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liu A; Lv J; Hu Y; Lang J; Ma L; Chen W
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Apr; 40(4):897-906. PubMed ID: 24698022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intracervical misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 for labor induction.
Chang YK; Chen WH; Yu MH; Liu HS
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Jan; 80(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 12527456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of efficacy and safety of sublingual misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening in prelabour rupture of membranes after 34 weeks of gestation.
Jha N; Sagili H; Jayalakshmi D; Lakshminarayanan S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jan; 291(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 25055933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oral misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for active management of premature rupture of membranes at term.
Nagpal MB; Raghunandan C; Saili A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 106(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 19375704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Misoprostol vaginal insert (Mysodelle) versus Dinoprostone intravaginal gel (Prostin) for induction of labour.
Sharp A; Faluyi D; Alfirevic Z
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():41-44. PubMed ID: 31226576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Misoprostol is more efficacious for labor induction than prostaglandin E2, but is it associated with more risk?
Kolderup L; McLean L; Grullon K; Safford K; Kilpatrick SJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jun; 180(6 Pt 1):1543-50. PubMed ID: 10368502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oral misoprostol and intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized comparison.
Bartha JL; Comino-Delgado R; Garcia-Benasach F; Martinez-Del-Fresno P; Moreno-Corral LJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Sep; 96(3):465-9. PubMed ID: 10960643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
