These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9452685)

  • 1. Biodynamics of attachments used in overdentures: experimental analysis with photoelasticity.
    Labaig C; Marco R; Fons A; Selva EJ
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Mar; 28(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 9452685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of magnetic attachment with stress breaker on lateral stress to abutment tooth under overdenture.
    Gonda T; Ikebe K; Ono T; Nokubi T
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Oct; 31(10):1001-6. PubMed ID: 15387841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical rationale for a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: an in vitro study.
    Maeda Y; Horisaka M; Yagi K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18081872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Surface stress analysis of distal extension removable partial denture retained with two types of semi-precision attachments].
    Wang Y; Mi N; Qing F; Liu F; Chen J
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 19(5):283-6. PubMed ID: 12539480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Photoelastic study of the support structures of distal-extension removable partial dentures.
    Costa MM; da Silva MA; Oliveira SA; Gomes VL; Carvalho PM; Lucas BL
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):589-95. PubMed ID: 19531158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
    Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Photoelastic analysis of stress patterns on teeth and bone with attachment retainers for removable partial dentures.
    Kratochvil FJ; Thompson WD; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Jul; 46(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 7024514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Photoelastic analysis of the effect of palatal support on various implant-supported overdenture designs.
    Ochiai KT; Williams BH; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 15153848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A 10-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining mandibular overdentures: peri-implant outcome.
    Naert I; Alsaadi G; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 15508985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: initial retention values.
    Michelinakis G; Barclay CW; Smith PW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 17323731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a self-adjusting magnetic attachment for implant overdentures.
    Maeda Y; Yang TC; Kinoshita Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 21519571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mandibular overdentures stabilized by Astra Tech implants with either ball attachments or magnets: 5-year results.
    Davis DM; Packer ME
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(3):222-9. PubMed ID: 10635189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Photoelastic stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures.
    Kenney R; Richards MW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Nov; 80(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 9813806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of load distribution for implant overdenture attachments.
    Porter JA; Petropoulos VC; Brunski JB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):651-62. PubMed ID: 12381065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
    Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selection of retainers in lower overlay denture-in relation to the abutment tooth mobility--(a laboratory study).
    Igarashi Y
    Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1975 Sep; 22(3):207-20. PubMed ID: 776431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of attachment type on the mobility of implant-stabilized overdentures--an in vitro study.
    Setz JM; Wright PS; Ferman AM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(6):494-9. PubMed ID: 11203675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.