These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9452810)

  • 41. [Femoral revision using cemented stem and compacted bone graft: femoral migration analysis].
    Marmorat JL; Leymarie JB; Piriou P; Norton M; Judet T
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2006 Apr; 92(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 16800068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision arthroplasty of the hip. A nine to fifteen-year follow-up.
    Blackley HR; Davis AM; Hutchison CR; Gross AE
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Mar; 83(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 11263637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Femoral loosening of total hip prosthesis caused by pseudarthrosis resulting from trochanterotomy].
    Langlais F; Benkalfate T; Thomazeau H; Abboud A; Lancien G; Chauvel JJ
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1995; 81(2):95-105. PubMed ID: 7569195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Acetabular revision with impacted irradiated frozen allografts].
    Wang Q; Zhang XL; Jiang Y; Chen YS; Shen H; Shao JJ
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Jul; 48(14):1045-9. PubMed ID: 21055105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Bousquet's device in the treatment of recurrent dislocation of a total hip prosthesis. Apropos of 13 cases].
    Leclercq S; el Blidi S; Aubriot JH
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1995; 81(5):389-94. PubMed ID: 8560007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The Exeter Universal stem: a minimum ten-year review from an independent centre.
    Hook S; Moulder E; Yates PJ; Burston BJ; Whitley E; Bannister GC
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Dec; 88(12):1584-90. PubMed ID: 17159168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Morselized homologous grafts in revision arthroplasty of the acetabulum.
    Herzog R; Morscher E
    Chir Organi Mov; 1994; 79(4):371-8. PubMed ID: 7614878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Bone defects as complication following total hip endoprosthesis implant].
    Täger G; Täger KH
    Orthopade; 1994 Nov; 23(6):421-9. PubMed ID: 7831056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [An original procedure for cement diaphyseal extraction. The segmental cement extraction system or SEG-CES].
    Cordonnier D; Desrousseaux JF; Polveche G; Rattier B; d'Almeida M; Vinchon B
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1996; 82(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 8761103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Revision arthroplasty of the hip joint with autologous and homologous cancellous bone].
    Morscher E; Dick W; Seelig W
    Orthopade; 1989 Sep; 18(5):428-37. PubMed ID: 2812775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Long-term review of homogeneous and consecutive series of 100 "Charnley"-type total hip prostheses].
    Gardes P; Favard L; Gardes JC
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1996; 82(4):306-12. PubMed ID: 8952910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Revision of total hip arthroplasty using the R.M. isoelastic prosthesis.
    Matricali GA; Thibaut H; Hendrickx M; Thibaut R
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1993; 59 Suppl 1():374-6. PubMed ID: 8116434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device with bone allograft: minimum 4.5-year follow-up results and mechanical analysis.
    Akiyama H; Yamamoto K; Tsukanaka M; Kawanabe K; Otsuka H; So K; Goto K; Nakamura T
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Sep; 93(9):1194-200. PubMed ID: 21911530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis diseases. A two- to six-year follow-up study.
    Cracchiolo A; Severt R; Moreland J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Apr; (277):166-74. PubMed ID: 1555338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Femoral reconstruction with impacted macroporous calcium phosphate ceramic in revision hip arthroplasty].
    Nich C; Bizot P; Nizard R; Sedel L
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2006 Jun; 92(4):343-50. PubMed ID: 16948461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Cemented revision of failed total hip arthroplasty. Survivorship analysis.
    Iorio R; Eftekhar NS; Kobayashi S; Grelsamer RP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Jul; (316):121-30. PubMed ID: 7634695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The use of a cementless femoral component for the management of bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty.
    Michelinakis E; Papapolychronlou T; Vafiadis J
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 1996; 55(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 8771351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The extent of the bone defect affects the outcome of femoral reconstruction in revision surgery with impacted bone grafting: a five- to 17-year follow-up study.
    Garcia-Cimbrelo E; Garcia-Rey E; Cruz-Pardos A
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Nov; 93(11):1457-64. PubMed ID: 22058294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Femoral windows in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Klein AH; Rubash HE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Jun; (291):164-70. PubMed ID: 8504595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Bulk structural autogenous grafts and allografts for reconstruction of the acetabulum in total hip arthroplasty. Sixteen-year-average follow-up.
    Shinar AA; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Feb; 79(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 9052535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 69.