284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9453087)
1. Optimisation of the prescription for trans-tibial (TT) amputees.
Cortés A; Viosca E; Hoyos JV; Prat J; Sánchez-Lacuesta J
Prosthet Orthot Int; 1997 Dec; 21(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 9453087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanics of ramp descent in unilateral trans-tibial amputees: Comparison of a microprocessor controlled foot with conventional ankle-foot mechanisms.
Struchkov V; Buckley JG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Feb; 32():164-70. PubMed ID: 26689894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A methodology for studying the effects of various types of prosthetic feet on the biomechanics of trans-femoral amputee gait.
van der Linden ML; Solomonidis SE; Spence WD; Li N; Paul JP
J Biomech; 1999 Sep; 32(9):877-89. PubMed ID: 10460124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of prosthetic ankle stiffness on ankle and knee kinematics, prosthetic limb loading, and net metabolic cost of trans-tibial amputee gait.
Major MJ; Twiste M; Kenney LP; Howard D
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Jan; 29(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 24238976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Joint moment and muscle power output characteristics of below knee amputees during running: the influence of energy storing prosthetic feet.
Czerniecki JM; Gitter A; Munro C
J Biomech; 1991; 24(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 2026634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of transfemoral amputees using a passive microprocessor-controlled knee versus an active powered microprocessor-controlled knee for level walking.
Creylman V; Knippels I; Janssen P; Biesbrouck E; Lechler K; Peeraer L
Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Dec; 15(Suppl 3):142. PubMed ID: 28105945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of two prosthetic feet on the multi-joint and multi-plane kinetic gait compensations in individuals with a unilateral trans-tibial amputation.
Underwood HA; Tokuno CD; Eng JJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Jul; 19(6):609-16. PubMed ID: 15234485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical efficiency during gait of adults with transtibial amputation: a pilot study comparing the SACH, Seattle, and Golden-Ankle prosthetic feet.
Prince F; Winter DA; Sjonnensen G; Powell C; Wheeldon RK
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Jun; 35(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 9651889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A 3D mathematical model to predict spinal joint and hip joint force for trans-tibial amputees with different SACH foot pylon adjustments.
Yu CH; Hung YC; Lin YH; Chen GX; Wei SH; Huang CH; Chen CS
Gait Posture; 2014 Sep; 40(4):545-8. PubMed ID: 25042463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benefits of an increased prosthetic ankle range of motion for individuals with a trans-tibial amputation walking with a new prosthetic foot.
Heitzmann DWW; Salami F; De Asha AR; Block J; Putz C; Wolf SI; Alimusaj M
Gait Posture; 2018 Jul; 64():174-180. PubMed ID: 29913354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lower limb amputee gait characteristics on a specifically designed test ramp: Preliminary results of a biomechanical comparison of two prosthetic foot concepts.
Schmalz T; Altenburg B; Ernst M; Bellmann M; Rosenbaum D
Gait Posture; 2019 Feb; 68():161-167. PubMed ID: 30497035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variability of kinetic variables during gait in unilateral transtibial amputees.
Svoboda Z; Janura M; Cabell L; Elfmark M
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2012 Jun; 36(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 22440580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of gait training and prosthetic foot category on external work symmetry during unilateral transtibial amputee gait.
Agrawal V; Gailey R; O'Toole C; Gaunaurd I; Finnieston A
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2013 Oct; 37(5):396-403. PubMed ID: 23364890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of prosthetic foot design on sound limb loading in adults with unilateral below-knee amputations.
Powers CM; Torburn L; Perry J; Ayyappa E
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1994 Jul; 75(7):825-9. PubMed ID: 8024435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic alignment using external socket reaction moments in trans-tibial amputees.
Jonkergouw N; Prins MR; van der Wurff P; Gijsbers J; Houdijk H; Buis AWP
Gait Posture; 2019 Feb; 68():122-129. PubMed ID: 30472524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Walking speed related joint kinetic alterations in trans-tibial amputees: impact of hydraulic 'ankle' damping.
De Asha AR; Munjal R; Kulkarni J; Buckley JG
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2013 Oct; 10():107. PubMed ID: 24134803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-distance walking effects on trans-tibial amputees compensatory gait patterns and implications on prosthetic designs and training.
Yeung LF; Leung AK; Zhang M; Lee WC
Gait Posture; 2012 Feb; 35(2):328-33. PubMed ID: 22055554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the International Committee of the Red Cross foot with the solid ankle cushion heel foot during gait: a randomized double-blind study.
Turcot K; Sagawa Y; Lacraz A; Lenoir J; Assal M; Armand S
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 94(8):1490-7. PubMed ID: 23578592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gait analysis and energy consumption of below-knee amputees wearing three different prosthetic feet.
Huang GF; Chou YL; Su FC
Gait Posture; 2000 Oct; 12(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 10998614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prosthetic weight acceptance mechanics in transtibial amputees wearing the Single Axis, Seattle Lite, and Flex Foot.
Perry J; Boyd LA; Rao SS; Mulroy SJ
IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng; 1997 Dec; 5(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 9422453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
