These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Compliance to clinical guidelines for early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer in relation to patient outcome. Sijmons EA; van Lankveld MA; Witteveen PO; Peeters PH; Koot VC; van Leeuwen JS Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Apr; 131(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 16707204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A new prognostic model for FIGO stage 1 epithelial ovarian cancer. Obermair A; Fuller A; Lopez-Varela E; van Gorp T; Vergote I; Eaton L; Fowler J; Quinn M; Hammond I; Marsden D; Proietto A; Carter J; Davy M; Tripcony L; Abu-Rustum N Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Mar; 104(3):607-11. PubMed ID: 17092548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Toward the development of a universal grading system for ovarian epithelial carcinoma. I. Prognostic significance of histopathologic features--problems involved in the architectural grading system. Shimizu Y; Kamoi S; Amada S; Hasumi K; Akiyama F; Silverberg SG Gynecol Oncol; 1998 Jul; 70(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 9698465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Analysis of risk factors for epithelial ovarian cancer recurrence]. Liu S; Liu JH; Huang H; Peng XP; Wang YM Ai Zheng; 2003 Nov; 22(11):1197-200. PubMed ID: 14613652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prognostic significance of CA 125 and TPS levels after 3 chemotherapy courses in ovarian cancer patients. van Dalen A; Favier J; Burges A; Hasholzner U; de Bruijn HW; Dobler-Girdziunaite D; Dombi VH; Fink D; Giai M; McGing P; Harlozinska A; Kainz C; Markowska J; Molina R; Sturgeon C; Bowman A; Einarsson R Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Dec; 79(3):444-50. PubMed ID: 11104617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prognostic criteria in patients with prostate cancer: Gleason score versus volume-weighted mean nuclear volume. Fujikawa K; Sasaki M; Arai Y; Yamabe H; Ogawa O; Yoshida O Clin Cancer Res; 1997 Apr; 3(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 9815728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Clinical significance of stereological estimation of mean nuclear volume in human bladder carcinoma--further analysis of nuclear morphometric variables]. Fukuzawa S; Hashimura T; Horii Y; Yoshida O; Sasaki M Hinyokika Kiyo; 1992 Dec; 38(12):1361-8. PubMed ID: 1288224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Prognostic factors in epithelial neoplasm of the ovary. A multivariate analysis]. Nazzal O; Suárez E; Olfos P; Campodónico I Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1993; 58(4):281-91; discussion 291-2. PubMed ID: 7991845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of the gynecologic oncologist on the survival of ovarian cancer patients. Chan JK; Kapp DS; Shin JY; Husain A; Teng NN; Berek JS; Osann K; Leiserowitz GS; Cress RD; O'Malley C Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 109(6):1342-50. PubMed ID: 17540806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prognostic value of nuclear area index in patients with bladder cancer. Yusup A; Kanamaru H; Aoki Y; Saikawa S; Moriyama N; Oyama N; Akino H; Okada K; Yokoyama O Int J Urol; 2004 Jun; 11(6):374-8. PubMed ID: 15157205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Correlation of nuclear morphometry of breast cancer in histological sections with clinicopathological features and prognosis. Abdalla F; Boder J; Markus R; Hashmi H; Buhmeida A; Collan Y Anticancer Res; 2009 May; 29(5):1771-6. PubMed ID: 19443402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prognostic value of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor tumor expression in Danish ovarian cancer patients: from the 'MALOVA' ovarian cancer study. Høgdall EV; Christensen L; Høgdall CK; Blaakaer J; Gayther S; Jacobs IJ; Christensen IJ; Kjaer SK Oncol Rep; 2007 Nov; 18(5):1051-9. PubMed ID: 17914554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. p53 and bcl-2 in epithelial ovarian carcinoma: their value as prognostic indicators at a median follow-up of 60 months. Geisler JP; Geisler HE; Miller GA; Wiemann MC; Zhou Z; Crabtree W Gynecol Oncol; 2000 May; 77(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 10785478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. In lymph node-negative invasive breast carcinomas, specific chromosomal aberrations are strongly associated with high mitotic activity and predict outcome more accurately than grade, tumour diameter, and oestrogen receptor. Janssen EA; Baak JP; Guervós MA; van Diest PJ; Jiwa M; Hermsen MA J Pathol; 2003 Dec; 201(4):555-61. PubMed ID: 14648658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of classic and quantitative prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. Ropponen K; Eskelinen M; Kosma VM; Lipponen P; Paakkinen P; Alhava E Anticancer Res; 1996; 16(6B):3875-82. PubMed ID: 9042274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The outcome of stage I-II clinically and surgically staged papillary serous and clear cell endometrial cancers when compared with endometrioid carcinoma. Cirisano FD; Robboy SJ; Dodge RK; Bentley RC; Krigman HR; Synan IS; Soper JT; Clarke-Pearson DL Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Apr; 77(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 10739691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Assessment of different histoprognosis grading systems for primary ovarian cancer: 100 patients given the same treatment for primary ovarian adenocarcinoma]. Penault-Llorca F; Levrel O; Clémenson A; Kwiatkowski F; Pomel C; Fouilhoux G; De Latour M; Curé H; Déchelotte P; Fonck Y; Dauplat J J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2000 Oct; 29(6):548-54. PubMed ID: 11084461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prognostic impact of morphometric nuclear grade of endometrial carcinoma. Salvesen HB; Iversen OE; Akslen LA Cancer; 1998 Sep; 83(5):956-64. PubMed ID: 9731900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prognostic value of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status in young Chinese ovarian carcinoma patients. Yang XY; Xi MR; Yang KX; Yu H Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 19178934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]