These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9455272)

  • 1. The application of a cellulose-based fibre dressing in surgical wounds.
    Foster L; Moore P
    J Wound Care; 1997 Nov; 6(10):469-73. PubMed ID: 9455272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modelling the cost implications of using carboxymethylcellulose dressing compared with gauze in the management of surgical wounds healing by secondary intention in the US and UK.
    Guest JF; Ruiz FJ
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 Feb; 21(2):281-90. PubMed ID: 15801999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost benefits of two dressings in the management of surgical wounds.
    Moore PJ; Foster L
    Br J Nurs; 2000 Sep 28-Oct 11; 9(17):1128-32. PubMed ID: 11868167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. OUTCOME OF FOAM VERSUS GAUZE DRESSINGS IN NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE TRAUMATIC WOUNDS WITH SOFT TISSUE LOSS AT KENYATTA NATIONAL HOSPITAL.
    Ondieki JG; Khainga SO; Owilla F; Nangole FW
    East Afr Med J; 2012 Jul; 89(7):230-40. PubMed ID: 26845802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical efficacy of biocellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose and normal saline dressing in epidermolysis bullosa.
    Dwiyana RF; Yogya Y; Gondokaryono SP; Diana IA; Suwarsa O; Ramali LM; Sutedja EK; Rahardja JI; Gunawan H
    J Wound Care; 2019 Oct; 28(Sup10):S4-S9. PubMed ID: 31600103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gauze packing of open surgical wounds: empirical or evidence-based practice?
    Dinah F; Adhikari A
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2006 Jan; 88(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 16460637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic review of dressings and topical agents for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention.
    Vermeulen H; Ubbink DT; Goossens A; de Vos R; Legemate DA
    Br J Surg; 2005 Jun; 92(6):665-72. PubMed ID: 15912490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An alternative dressing material for the split-thickness skin graft donor site: oxidized regenerated cellulose.
    Uysal AC; Alagoz MS; Orbay H; Sensoz O
    Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Jul; 57(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 16799310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of a gelling fibre dressing in complex surgical or chronic wounds: a case series.
    Ivins N; Braumann C; Kirchhoff JB; Waldemar U; Jones NJ
    J Wound Care; 2018 Jul; 27(7):444-454. PubMed ID: 30016138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of dressings in the management of surgical abdominal wounds.
    Cannavo M; Fairbrother G; Owen D; Ingle J; Lumley T
    J Wound Care; 1998 Feb; 7(2):57-62. PubMed ID: 9543974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An RCT to compare a bio-cellulose wound dressing with a non-adherent dressing in VLUs.
    Alvarez OM; Phillips TJ; Menzoian JO; Patel M; Andriessen A
    J Wound Care; 2012 Sep; 21(9):448-53. PubMed ID: 22990398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microbial cellulose dressing compared with silver sulphadiazine for the treatment of partial thickness burns: A prospective, randomised, clinical trial.
    Aboelnaga A; Elmasry M; Adly OA; Elbadawy MA; Abbas AH; Abdelrahman I; Salah O; Steinvall I
    Burns; 2018 Dec; 44(8):1982-1988. PubMed ID: 30005989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do patient and nurse outcome differences exist between 2 negative pressure wound therapy systems?
    Albert NM; Rock R; Sammon MA; Bena JF; Morrison SL; Whitman A; Kato I; Landis-Erdman JC
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2012; 39(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 22552107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of three primary non-adherent dressings applied to hand surgery wounds.
    Terrill PJ; Varughese G
    J Wound Care; 2000 Sep; 9(8):359-63. PubMed ID: 11933363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective comparison of a new, synthetic donor site dressing versus an impregnated gauze dressing.
    Hickerson WL; Kealey GP; Smith DJ; Thomson PD
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 1994; 15(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 7929519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of hydrofibre and alginate dressings on open acute surgical wounds.
    Foster L; Moore P; Clark S
    J Wound Care; 2000 Oct; 9(9):442-5. PubMed ID: 11933488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Timing of dressing removal in the healing of surgical wounds by primary intention: quantitative systematic review protocol.
    Berg A; Fleischer S; Kuss O; Unverzagt S; Langer G
    J Adv Nurs; 2012 Feb; 68(2):264-70. PubMed ID: 21834835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Negative pressure wound therapy for skin grafts and surgical wounds healing by primary intention.
    Webster J; Scuffham P; Stankiewicz M; Chaboyer WP
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; (10):CD009261. PubMed ID: 25287701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective cohort study on surgical wounds comparing a polyhexanide-containing biocellulose dressing with a dialkyl-carbamoyl-chloride-containing hydrophobic dressing.
    Nielsen AM; Andriessen A
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2012 Sep; 25(9):409-13. PubMed ID: 22914037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Split-thickness skin graft donor site management. A randomized prospective trial comparing a hydrophilic polyurethane absorbent foam dressing with a petrolatum gauze dressing.
    Weber RS; Hankins P; Limitone E; Callender D; Frankenthaler RM; Wolf P; Goepfert H
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1995 Oct; 121(10):1145-9. PubMed ID: 7546582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.