These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9455605)

  • 1. Interstimulus interval has no effect on a mid-latency scalp potential generated by innocuous-related activity in the primary somatosensory cortex.
    Dowman R
    Brain Topogr; 1997; 10(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 9455605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SEP topographies elicited by innocuous and noxious sural nerve stimulation. II. Effects of stimulus intensity on topographic pattern and amplitude.
    Dowman R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Jul; 92(4):303-15. PubMed ID: 7517852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of interstimulus interval on scalp topographies evoked by noxious sural nerve stimulation.
    Dowman R
    Psychophysiology; 1996 Jul; 33(4):398-408. PubMed ID: 8753940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Negative difference potential isolates scalp potentials generated by activity in supraspinal nociceptive pathways.
    Dowman R
    Psychophysiology; 1996 Sep; 33(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 8854747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Innocuous-related sural nerve-evoked and finger-evoked potentials generated in the primary somatosensory and supplementary motor cortices.
    Dowman R; Schell S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Dec; 110(12):2104-16. PubMed ID: 10616115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. SEP topographies elicited by innocuous and noxious sural nerve stimulation. I. Identification of stable periods and individual differences.
    Dowman R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Jul; 92(4):291-302. PubMed ID: 7517851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of a selective A beta afferent block on the pain-related SEP scalp topography.
    Dowman R; Bridgman PM
    Brain Topogr; 1995; 8(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 8829391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characteristics of the human contra- versus ipsilateral SII cortex.
    Wegner K; Forss N; Salenius S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 May; 111(5):894-900. PubMed ID: 10802461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Human intracranially-recorded cortical responses evoked by painful electrical stimulation of the sural nerve.
    Dowman R; Darcey T; Barkan H; Thadani V; Roberts D
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jan; 34(2):743-63. PubMed ID: 17097306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Topographic analysis of painful laser and sural nerve electrical evoked potentials.
    Dowman R
    Brain Topogr; 2004; 16(3):169-79. PubMed ID: 15162914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Different contribution of joint and cutaneous inputs to early scalp somatosensory evoked potentials.
    Restuccia D; Valeriani M; Barba C; Le Pera D; Tonali P; Mauguière F
    Muscle Nerve; 1999 Jul; 22(7):910-9. PubMed ID: 10398210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SEP topographies elicited by innocuous and noxious sural nerve stimulation. III. Dipole source localization analysis.
    Dowman R; Darcey TM
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Sep; 92(5):373-91. PubMed ID: 7523081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Potentials evoked in human and monkey cerebral cortex by stimulation of the median nerve. A review of scalp and intracranial recordings.
    Allison T; McCarthy G; Wood CC; Jones SJ
    Brain; 1991 Dec; 114 ( Pt 6)():2465-503. PubMed ID: 1782527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differential recording of upper and lower cervical N13 responses and their contribution to scalp recorded responses in median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials.
    Fujimoto H; Kaneko K; Taguchi T; Ofuji A; Yonemura H; Kawai S
    J Neurol Sci; 2001 Jun; 187(1-2):17-26. PubMed ID: 11440740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relationship between human long-latency somatosensory evoked potentials recorded from the cortical surface and from the scalp.
    Allison T; McCarthy G; Wood CC
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992; 84(4):301-14. PubMed ID: 1377999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New concept for the recovery function of short-latency somatosensory evoked cortical potentials following median nerve stimulation.
    Hoshiyama M; Kakigi R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Apr; 113(4):535-41. PubMed ID: 11955998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Central somatosensory conduction in man: neural generators and interpeak latencies of the far-field components recorded from neck and right or left scalp and earlobes.
    Desmedt JE; Cheron G
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Dec; 50(5-6):382-403. PubMed ID: 6160982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recovery functions of common peroneal, posterior tibial and sural nerve somatosensory evoked potentials.
    Saito T; Yamada T; Hasegawa A; Matsue Y; Emori T; Onishi H; Fuchigami T
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992 Oct; 85(5):337-44. PubMed ID: 1385094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The pain-evoked P2 is not a P3a event-related potential.
    Dowman R
    Brain Topogr; 2004; 17(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 15669751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dipolar sources of the early scalp somatosensory evoked potentials to upper limb stimulation. Effect of increasing stimulus rates.
    Valeriani M; Restuccia D; Di Lazzaro V; Le Pera D; Barba C; Tonali P; Mauguiere F
    Exp Brain Res; 1998 Jun; 120(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 9628417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.