These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9455629)

  • 21. Changes in hydration of the stratum corneum are the most suitable indicator to evaluate the irritation of surfactants on the skin.
    Fujimura T; Shimotoyodome Y; Nishijima T; Sugata K; Taguchi H; Moriwaki S
    Skin Res Technol; 2017 Feb; 23(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 27500370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Hand and forearm skin: comparison of their respective responsiveness to surfactants.
    Paye M; Cartiaux Y; Goffin V; Pierard GE
    Skin Res Technol; 2001 May; 7(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 11393208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Shielded corneosurfametry and corneoxenometry: novel bioassays for the assessment of skin barrier products.
    Goffin V; Piérard-Franchimont C; Piérard GE
    Dermatology; 1998; 196(4):434-7. PubMed ID: 9669124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Functional map and age-related differences in the human face: nonimmunologic contact urticaria induced by hexyl nicotinate.
    Marrakchi S; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Jul; 55(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 16842548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The use of a measure of acute irritation to predict the outcome of repeated usage of hand soap products.
    Williams C; Wilkinson M; McShane P; Pennington D; Fernandez C; Pierce S
    Br J Dermatol; 2011 Jun; 164(6):1311-5. PubMed ID: 21332456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Development of a standardized testing procedure for assessing the irritation potential of occupational skin cleansers.
    Elsner P; Seyfarth F; Antonov D; John SM; Diepgen T; Schliemann S
    Contact Dermatitis; 2014 Mar; 70(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 24588368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. On the course of the irritant reaction after irritation with sodium lauryl sulphate.
    Gloor M; Senger B; Langenauer M; Fluhr JW
    Skin Res Technol; 2004 Aug; 10(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 15225263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison between interactions of triglyceride oil and mineral oil with proteins and their ability to reduce cleanser surfactant-induced irritation.
    Mukherjee S; Yang L; Vincent C; Lei X; Ottaviani MF; Ananthapadmanabhan KP
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2015 Aug; 37(4):371-8. PubMed ID: 25656133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Human stratum corneum adsorption of nickel salts. Investigation of depth profiles by tape stripping in vivo.
    Hostýnek JJ; Dreher F; Nakada T; Schwindt D; Anigbogu A; Maibach HI
    Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 2001; (212):11-8. PubMed ID: 11802472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Human stratum corneum penetration by nickel. In vivo study of depth distribution after occlusive application of the metal as powder.
    Hostýnek JJ; Dreher F; Pelosi A; Anigbogu A; Maibach HI
    Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 2001; (212):5-10. PubMed ID: 11802474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Damage to the skin by repetitive washing.
    Grunewald AM; Gloor M; Gehring W; Kleesz P
    Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Apr; 32(4):225-32. PubMed ID: 7600778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microwave corneosurfametry and the short-duration dansyl chloride extraction test for rating concentrated irritant surfactants.
    Goffin V; Piérard GE
    Dermatology; 2001; 202(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 11244229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of various grit-containing cleansers on skin barrier function.
    Wigger-Alberti W; Fischer T; Greif C; Maddern P; Elsner P
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Sep; 41(3):136-40. PubMed ID: 10475511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of allergens and irritants on levels of natural moisturizing factor and corneocyte morphology.
    Koppes SA; Ljubojević Hadžavdić S; Jakasa I; Franceschi N; Riethmüller C; Jurakić Tončic R; Marinovic B; Raj N; Rawlings AV; Voegeli R; Lane ME; Haftek M; Frings-Dresen MH; Rustemeyer T; Kezic S
    Contact Dermatitis; 2017 May; 76(5):287-295. PubMed ID: 28295421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effects of prolonged use of surfactants on the skin of normal and photo-exposed hairless mice.
    Tavakkol A; Kligman LH; Morrison BM; Polefka TG
    Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Nov; 39(5):231-9. PubMed ID: 9840259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Interactions of C12 surfactants with the skin: studies on enzyme release and percutaneous absorption in vitro.
    Gibson WT; Teall MR
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1983 Oct; 21(5):581-6. PubMed ID: 6686185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of vehicles and sodium lauryl sulphate on xenobiotic permeability and stratum corneum partitioning in porcine skin.
    van der Merwe D; Riviere JE
    Toxicology; 2005 Jan; 206(3):325-35. PubMed ID: 15588923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The irritation potential and reservoir effect of mild soaps.
    Lodén M; Buraczewska I; Edlund F
    Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Aug; 49(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 14641357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cleansing, dehydrating, barrier-damaging and irritating hyperaemising effect of four detergent brands: comparative studies using standardised washing models.
    Gloor M; Wasik B; Gehring W; Grieshaber R; Kleesz P; Fluhr JW
    Skin Res Technol; 2004 Feb; 10(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 14731242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of washing on the thickness of the stratum corneum in normal and atopic individuals.
    White MI; Jenkinson DM; Lloyd DH
    Br J Dermatol; 1987 Apr; 116(4):525-30. PubMed ID: 3580287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.