These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9455750)

  • 1. Effects of polarity on defibrillation thresholds using a biphasic waveform in a hot can electrode system.
    Yamanouchi Y; Mowrey KA; Nadzam GR; Hills DG; Kroll MW; Brewer JE; Donohoo AM; Wilkoff BL; Tchou PJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Dec; 20(12 Pt 1):2911-6. PubMed ID: 9455750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of electrode polarity on internal defibrillation with monophasic and biphasic waveforms using an endocardial lead system.
    Huang J; KenKnight BH; Walcott GP; Walker RG; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Feb; 8(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 9048247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrode polarity is an important determinant of defibrillation efficacy using a nonthoracotomy system.
    Thakur RK; Souza JJ; Chapman PD; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 May; 17(5 Pt 1):919-23. PubMed ID: 8022704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of polarity for monophasic and biphasic shocks on defibrillation efficacy with an endocardial system.
    Usui M; Walcott GP; Strickberger SA; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Jan; 19(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 8848379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimized pulse durations minimize the effect of polarity reversal on defibrillation efficacy with biphasic shocks.
    Schauerte P; Schöndube FA; Grossmann M; Messmer BJ; Hanrath P; Stellbrink C
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 May; 22(5):790-7. PubMed ID: 10353140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of rapid biphasic shock subpulse switching on ventricular defibrillation thresholds.
    Dosdall DJ; Rothe DE; Brandon TA; Sweeney JD
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Jul; 15(7):802-8. PubMed ID: 15250866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ventricular defibrillation with triphasic waveforms.
    Huang J; KenKnight BH; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 2000 Mar; 101(11):1324-8. PubMed ID: 10725294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of respiration phase on ventricular defibrillation threshold in a hot can electrode system.
    Yamanouchi Y; Mowrey KA; Kroll MW; Brewer JE; Donohoo AM; Niebauer MJ; Wilkoff BL; Tchou PJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jun; 21(6):1216-24. PubMed ID: 9633063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved efficacy of anodal biphasic defibrillation shocks following a failed defibrillation attempt.
    Roberts PR; Allen S; Smith DC; Urban JF; Euler DE; Kallok MJ; Morgan JM
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Dec; 22(12):1753-9. PubMed ID: 10642128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of epicardial patches on defibrillation threshold with nonthoracotomy lead configurations.
    Fotuhi PC; Ideker RE; Idriss SF; Callihan RL; Walker RG; Alt EU
    Circulation; 1995 Nov; 92(10):3082-8. PubMed ID: 7586279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct comparison of monophasic, biphasic and sequential pulse defibrillation over a single current pathway.
    Thakur R; Souza JJ; Chapman PD; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN
    Can J Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 12(4):407-11. PubMed ID: 8608460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of transvenous electrode polarity and waveform duration on the relationship between defibrillation threshold and upper limit of vulnerability.
    Huang J; KenKnight BH; Walcott GP; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1997 Aug; 96(4):1351-9. PubMed ID: 9286969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective randomized comparison of 50%/50% versus 65%/65% tilt biphasic waveform on defibrillation in humans.
    Sweeney MO; Natale A; Volosin KJ; Swerdlow CD; Baker JH; Degroot P
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Jan; 24(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 11227971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A direct comparison of epicardial and nonthoracotomy defibrillation using monophasic and biphasic shocks.
    Thakur RK; Souza JJ; Troup PJ; Chapman PD; Wetherbee JN
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jan; 18(1 Pt 1):70-4. PubMed ID: 7700834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of ventricular fibrillation duration and site of initiation on the defibrillation threshold during early ventricular fibrillation.
    Strobel JS; Kenknight BH; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1998 Aug; 32(2):521-7. PubMed ID: 9708486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in sheep.
    Cooper RA; Alferness CA; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1993 May; 87(5):1673-86. PubMed ID: 8491023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of first-phase polarity of biphasic shocks on defibrillation threshold with a single transvenous lead system.
    Strickberger SA; Man KC; Daoud E; Neary MP; Horwood LE; Niebauer M; Hummel JD; Morady F
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1995 Jun; 25(7):1605-8. PubMed ID: 7759712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does electrode polarity alter the energy requirements for transthoracic biphasic waveform defibrillation? Experimental studies.
    Karlsson G; Zhang Y; Davies LR; Coddington W; Kerber RE
    Resuscitation; 2001 Oct; 51(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 11719177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using dual, triple, and quadruple electrode systems.
    Munsif AN; Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Matthew P; Giorgberidze I; Kaushik RR; Mehra R
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Jun; 79(12):1632-9. PubMed ID: 9202354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Defibrillation with a minimally invasive direct cardiac massage device.
    Walcott GP; Booker RG; Ideker RE
    Resuscitation; 2002 Dec; 55(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 12458067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.