225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9455950)
1. Clinical utility of the 512-Hz Rinne tuning fork test.
Burkey JM; Lippy WH; Schuring AG; Rizer FM
Am J Otol; 1998 Jan; 19(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 9455950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A reevaluation of the 512-Hz Rinne tuning fork test as a patient selection criterion for laser stapedotomy.
Gordon MA; Silverstein H; Willcox TO; Rosenberg SI
Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):712-7. PubMed ID: 9831142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The validity of tuning fork tests in diagnosing hearing loss.
Miltenburg DM
J Otolaryngol; 1994 Aug; 23(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 7996624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rinne revisited: steel versus aluminum tuning forks.
MacKechnie CA; Greenberg JJ; Gerkin RC; McCall AA; Hirsch BE; Durrant JD; Raz Y
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Dec; 149(6):907-13. PubMed ID: 24085711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stapedectomy for far-advanced otosclerosis.
Shea PF; Ge X; Shea JJ
Am J Otol; 1999 Jul; 20(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 10431881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical accuracy of tuning fork tests.
Stankiewicz JA; Mowry HJ
Laryngoscope; 1979 Dec; 89(12):1956-63. PubMed ID: 513917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Physical diagnostic procedures: whispered speech and tuning fork test].
Grote JJ; de Laat JA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Aug; 142(32):1816-9. PubMed ID: 9856153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of the Weber and Rinne tuning fork tests in evaluation of children with otitis media with effusion.
Behn A; Westerberg BD; Zhang H; Riding KH; Ludemann JP; Kozak FK
J Otolaryngol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 17942032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Rinne tuning fork test.
Swan IR
Hosp Pract (Off Ed); 1989 Sep; 24(9A):99-102. PubMed ID: 2506208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The tuning fork--an essential instrument in otologic practice.
Doyle PJ; Anderson DW; Pijl S
J Otolaryngol; 1984 Apr; 13(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 6726852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Rinne test for conductive deafness. A critical reappraisal.
Chole RA; Cook GB
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1988 Apr; 114(4):399-403. PubMed ID: 3348896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Bing test in the detection of conductive hearing impairment.
Swan IR; Browning GG
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1989 Dec; 14(6):539-43. PubMed ID: 2692884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Tuning fork study in deafness. Thus function Rinne and Weber tests].
Ziemer C
MMW Fortschr Med; 2006 Apr; 148(15):18. PubMed ID: 16711196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The importance of tuning forks].
Reiss M; Reiss G
Praxis (Bern 1994); 2002 Jan; 91(1-2):17-9. PubMed ID: 11824141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of a smartphone-based Rinne test to detect an air-bone gap.
Hibscher D; Oron Y; Handzel O; Warshavsky A; Horowitz G; Ungar OJ
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Dec; 278(12):4767-4773. PubMed ID: 33454812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Tuning-fork tests--outdated?].
Reiss M
Fortschr Med; 1999 Apr; 117(12):18-20. PubMed ID: 10361362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of the Bing and Rinne tuning fork tests.
Wilson WR; Woods LA
Arch Otolaryngol; 1975 Feb; 101(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 1092293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgical findings and long-term hearing results in 3,050 stapedotomies for primary otosclerosis: a prospective study with the otology-neurotology database.
Vincent R; Sperling NM; Oates J; Jindal M
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Dec; 27(8 Suppl 2):S25-47. PubMed ID: 16985478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
