BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9456242)

  • 1. The detection of changes in mammographic densities.
    Ursin G; Astrahan MA; Salane M; Parisky YR; Pearce JG; Daniels JR; Pike MC; Spicer DV
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1998 Jan; 7(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 9456242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reversal of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist induced reductions in mammographic densities on stopping treatment.
    Gram IT; Ursin G; Spicer DV; Pike MC
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2001 Nov; 10(11):1117-20. PubMed ID: 11700258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in mammographic densities induced by a hormonal contraceptive designed to reduce breast cancer risk.
    Spicer DV; Ursin G; Parisky YR; Pearce JG; Shoupe D; Pike A; Pike MC
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1994 Mar; 86(6):431-6. PubMed ID: 8120917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reduced mammographic density with use of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist-based chemoprevention regimen in BRCA1 carriers.
    Weitzel JN; Buys SS; Sherman WH; Daniels A; Ursin G; Daniels JR; MacDonald DJ; Blazer KR; Pike MC; Spicer DV
    Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Jan; 13(2 Pt 1):654-8. PubMed ID: 17255289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial (NCIC CTG MAP1) examining the effects of letrozole on mammographic breast density and other end organs in postmenopausal women.
    Cigler T; Tu D; Yaffe MJ; Findlay B; Verma S; Johnston D; Richardson H; Hu H; Qi S; Goss PE
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Apr; 120(2):427-35. PubMed ID: 19967558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sex steroids and breast cancer prevention.
    Spicer DV; Pike MC
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1994; (16):139-47. PubMed ID: 7999456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hormonal reduction of mammographic densities: potential effects on breast cancer risk and performance of diagnostic and screening mammography.
    Feig SA
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1994 Mar; 86(6):408-9. PubMed ID: 8120909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of mammographic density changes on plain film mammograms in postmenopausal women on hormone replacement therapy.
    Orguc S; Goktan C; Ovali GY; Karaer O; Oruc S
    Indian J Med Res; 2006 Nov; 124(5):545-52. PubMed ID: 17213523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Screening mammography: value in women 35-39 years old.
    Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Deutch BM; Thaler HT; Lippin BS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8517320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of hormone replacement therapy regimens on mammographic breast density: the role of progestins.
    Topal NB; Ayhan S; Topal U; Bilgin T
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2006 Jun; 32(3):305-8. PubMed ID: 16764621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study.
    Wolfe JN; Saftlas AF; Salane M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Jun; 148(6):1087-92. PubMed ID: 3495132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast tissue density quantification via digitized mammograms.
    Saha PK; Udupa JK; Conant EF; Chakraborty DP; Sullivan D
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Aug; 20(8):792-803. PubMed ID: 11513030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammographic appearance of cancer in the opposite breast: comparison with the first cancer.
    Roubidoux MA; Lai NE; Paramagul C; Joynt LK; Helvie MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jan; 166(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 8571898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tamoxifen and mammographic breast densities.
    Brisson J; Brisson B; Coté G; Maunsell E; Bérubé S; Robert J
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2000 Sep; 9(9):911-5. PubMed ID: 11008908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigation of lesions detected by mammography. The Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists.
    CMAJ; 1998 Feb; 158 Suppl 3():S9-14. PubMed ID: 9484273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of postmenopausal hormonal replacement therapy on mammographic density and parenchymal pattern.
    Laya MB; Gallagher JC; Schreiman JS; Larson EB; Watson P; Weinstein L
    Radiology; 1995 Aug; 196(2):433-7. PubMed ID: 7617857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pain and increased mammographic density in women receiving hormone replacement therapy: a prospective study.
    McNicholas MM; Heneghan JP; Milner MH; Tunney T; Hourihane JB; MacErlaine DP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Aug; 163(2):311-5. PubMed ID: 8037021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Less mammographic density after nasal versus oral administration of postmenopausal hormone therapy.
    van Dijck JA; Otten JD; Karssemeijer N; Kenemans P; Verbeek AL; van der Mooren MJ
    Climacteric; 2011 Dec; 14(6):683-8. PubMed ID: 21942620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
    May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Gothenburg breast screening trial: first results on mortality, incidence, and mode of detection for women ages 39-49 years at randomization.
    Bjurstam N; Björneld L; Duffy SW; Smith TC; Cahlin E; Eriksson O; Hafström LO; Lingaas H; Mattsson J; Persson S; Rudenstam CM; Säve-Söderbergh J
    Cancer; 1997 Dec; 80(11):2091-9. PubMed ID: 9392331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.